Evaluation of Sustainability in the Development of Food Packaging

  • V. L. SuárezEmail author
  • G. Barrera
  • R. M. Naveiro
Part of the Advanced Structured Materials book series (STRUCTMAT, volume 98)


In recent years, sustainable development has frequently appeared in technical and non-technical publications, particularly in regards to the pressing issues of high level of consumption and constant increase of waste in production processes. This has brought serious consequences in the environmental degradation, mainly due to the faster discarding of products, especially packaging. The process of packaging development must comply with the requirements of environmental preservation. This paper aims at evaluates packaging sustainability, company packages, two of them fulfilling for environmental requirements development by the National Institute of Technology (INT) in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, and other two are not considered environmental constraints in the design. The evaluation was developed using a checklist approach, a qualitative evaluation instrument that defines the level of attendance of sustainability requirements. Some of the criteria used were: sustainable materials, reuse, reuse during harvest, post-harvest, transportation, exhibition and placement at the point of sale and reduce costs for the producer and the final vendor. Finally, the checklist approach served to define: what is the best package of sustainable behavior? and can be used in other similar studies.


Food packaging Sustainability Sustainable packaging 



The authors are thankful for the support provided by CNPq, CAPES, Metropolitan Institute of Technology—ITM and Mr. Luiz Carlos do Carmo Motta of the Institute National of Technology for their support.


  1. 1.
    ABRE—Brazilian Packaging Association. Market Data—2013. (2016). Accessed 10 Sept 2016
  2. 2.
    Pereira, P., da Silva, R.P.P.: Identificação e Sistematização de Diretrizes para o Design de Embalagens Sustentáveis. Design & Tecnologia Review, 5th edn. (2013)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sachs, I.: Desenvolvimento: Includente, sustentável, sustentado. Garamond, Rio de Janeiro (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    NAFCAM. National Council for Advanced Manufacturing. (2017). Accessed 13 July 2017
  5. 5.
    Almeida, F.: Os desafios da Sustentabilidade: una ruptura urgente. Elsevier, Rio de Janeiro (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bhamra, T., Lofthouse, V.: Design for sustainability. A Practical Approach, pp. 28–29, 1st edn. Gower, England (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Grazziotin., L., Vieira, G.: Organização de referências na concepção de embalagens sustentáveis de produtos hortifrutícolas. In: 9th Brazilian Congress on Research and Development in design. 13 to 16 Oct 2010 at the University Anhembi Morumbi (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Moura, R., Banzato. J. M.: Embalagem, utilização e conteinerização. IMAM, São Paulo (1997)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Boylston, S.: Design Sustainable Packaging, 1st edn. Laurance King, London (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Oliveira, D., Aquino. A.M.: Guia para Comprovação da Segurança de Alimentos e Ingredientes, Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária – ANVISA (2013)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    YIN, R.K.: Estudo de caso - Planejamento e métodos, 4th edn, 248 pp. Bookman (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Arts and Humanities Faculty, Design DepartmentMetropolitan Technological Institute, ITMMedellínColombia
  2. 2.Arts and Humanities Faculty, Design DepartmentTechnology Center, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, UFRJRio de JaneiroBrazil

Personalised recommendations