Advertisement

Not Everyone Gets a Seat at the Table!: Responding to the Language Games of Diversity

  • Jonathan T. Torres
  • Nicole C. FerryEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Education, Equity, Economy book series (EEEC, volume 7)

Abstract

Teaching issues of diversity, privilege, equity, and equality occupies a precarious but indispensable position given the increasing tensions between so-called “liberal” institutions of education and conservative politics. Over the past decade, as social justice movements have gained momentum, we have simultaneously witnessed the language of equality and inclusion become co-opted for the purposes of ensuring white-supremacist, patriarchal, and capitalist dominance. With this reformulation of progressive rhetoric to serve racist, xenophobic, and sexist ends, how do we as educators communicate to students the importance of diversity and equality while simultaneously critiquing the language games played by those who use progressive narratives as a Trojan horse of social justice? This chapter was generated from the experiences of two teacher educators, who are also scholars in the field of critical discourse analysis. They propose subverting rhetoric launched against social justice efforts—repackaging the Trojan horse and sending it back—in order to reconfigure language of inclusion/exclusion, equality/equity, and free/hate speech. The purpose of preparing future teachers for the growing complexity of interdiscursive language games is to empower them to navigate educational settings that are becoming simultaneously more diverse and yet more restricted in terms of the conversations that can take place.

Keywords

Diversity Equality Critical discourse analysis Teacher education Poststructuralism Language 

References

  1. Anderson, N. Å. (2003). Discursive analytical strategies: Understanding Foucault, Koselleck, Laclau, Luhmann. Bristol: The Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bauman, Z. (2007). Liquid times: Living in an age of uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  3. Besley, T., & Peters, M. (2007). Subjectivity & truth: Foucault, education, and the culture of self. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  4. Blacker, D. (2013). The falling rate of learning and the neoliberal endgame. Washington, DC: Zero Books.Google Scholar
  5. Bousquet, M. (2008). How the university works: Higher education and the low-wage nation. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, W. (2015, April 2). Booked #3: What exactly is neoliberalism?. Dissent Retrieved from https://www.dissentmagazine.org/
  7. Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Carroll, H. (2001). Affirmative reaction: New formations of white masculinity. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Chung, A. (2018). Divided supreme court may allow Ohio voter purge policy. Reuters. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/
  10. Coates, T. (2014, June). The case for reparations. The Atlantic. Retrieved from http://www.theatlantic.com
  11. Darder, A. (2012). Neoliberalism in the academic borderlands: An on-going struggle for equality and human rights. Educational Studies, 48(5), 412–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. de Beauvoir, S. (1953). The second sex (H. M. Parshly, Trans.). New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  13. Derrida, J. (1983). Dissemination (B. Johnson, Trans.). Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Duggan, L. (2003). The twilight of equality? Neoliberalism, cultural politics, and the attack on democracy. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  15. Duggan, L. (2014, November 23). On trauma and trigger warnings, in three parts. Bully Bloggers. Retrieved from https://bullybloggers.wordpress.com/
  16. Fairclough, N. (2000). Language and neo-liberalism. Discourse and Society, 11(2), 147–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fairclough, N. (2001). Language and power (2nd ed.). Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  18. Ferguson, R. A. (2012). The reorder of things: The university and its pedagogies of minority difference. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fine, M. (1994). Working the hyphens. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 70–82). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  20. Fish, S. (2004). Intellectual diversity: The Trojan horse of a dark design. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 50(23), B13–B14.Google Scholar
  21. Freire, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the oppressed (M. B. Ramos, Trans.). New York: Herder.Google Scholar
  22. Gee, J. P. (2011). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Gentilviso, C. (2014, July 18). Todd akin on abortion: ‘Legitimate rape’ victims have ‘ways to try to shut that whole thing down.’ Huffington Post. Retrieved from https://www.huffingtonpost.com/
  24. Gesiotto, M. (2017, March 2). Facts, not feelings: Snowflakes, safe spaces and trigger warnings. The Washington Times. Retrieved from https://www.washingtontimes.com/
  25. Giroux, H. (2011). Zombie politics and culture in the age of casino capitalism. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Greene, P. (2017, July 24). What do we do with the flat Earthers? Huffington Post. Retrieved from https://www.huffingtonpost.com/
  27. Halberstam, J. (2014, July 5). You are triggering me! The neo-liberal rhetoric of harm, danger and trauma. Bully Bloggers. Retrieved from https://bullybloggers.wordpress.com/
  28. Hall, S. (2001). Foucault: Power, knowledge and discourse. In M. Wethrell, S. Taylor, & S. J. Yates (Eds.), Discourse theory and practice: A reader (pp. 72–81). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  29. Harding, S. (1987). Feminism and methodology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Hare, J. (2017, April 18). Holocaust deniers leave leaflets target students at two universities. The Australian. Retrieved from http://www.theaustralian.com.au/
  31. Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Heidegger, M. (1977). The question concerning technology, and other essays. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  33. Hooks, B. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Hunt, E. (2017, January 22). Trump’s inauguration crowd: Sean Spicer’s claims versus the evidence. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/
  35. Illich, I. (1973). Deschooling society. Harmondsworth, Penguin.Google Scholar
  36. Kopplin, Z. (2015, April 21). Dismissing Darwin. Slate. Retrieved from http://www.slate.com/
  37. Kozol, J. (2012). Savage inequalities: Children in America’s schools. New York: Broadway Books.Google Scholar
  38. Lather, P. (1993). Fertile obsession: Validity after poststructuralism. The Sociological Quarterly, 34(4), 673–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lather, P. (2001). Issues of validity in openly ideological research: Between a rock and a soft place. In C. F. Conrad, J. G. Haworth, & L. R. Lattuca (Eds.), Qualitative research in higher education: Expanding perspectives (pp. 348–365). Boston: Peason Custom Publishing.Google Scholar
  40. Liptak, A. (2017). Supreme court allows trump travel ban to take effect. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/
  41. Mayfield, M. (2017, August 24). Steve Bannon, Ann Coulter, Milo Yiannopoulos invited to Berkeley’s ‘free speech week’. The Washington Examiner. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/
  42. McRobbie, A. (2009). The aftermath of feminism. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  43. Melamed, J. (2011). Represent and destroy: Rationalizing violence in the new racial capitalism (difference incorporated). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ortega y Gasset, J. (1964). The revolt of the masses. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  45. Oxford English Dictionary. (2016). Word of the year 2016: Post-truth. Retrieved from https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/
  46. Pellegrini, A. (2014, November 27). Classrooms and their dissed contents. Bully Bloggers. Retrieved from https://bullybloggers.wordpress.com/
  47. Peters, M. A. (2001). Poststructuralism, marxism, and neoliberalism: Between theory and politics. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  48. Powers, K. (2015, May 11). How liberals ruined college. The Daily Beast. Retrieved from http://www.thedailybeast.com/
  49. Prichep, D. (2013, December 29). A campus more colorful than reality: Beware that college brochure. NRP, Weekend Edition Sunday. Retrieved from http://www.npr.org/
  50. Richardson, L., & St. Pierre, E. A. (2005). Writing: A method of inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 959–978). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  51. Sarup, M. (1993). Post-structuralism and postmodernism (2nd ed.). London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  52. Savage, C. (2017). Justice Department. to take on affirmative action in college admissions. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/
  53. Signman, B. (2017, June 20). College students testify: Free speech under assault on campuses. Fox News Politics. Retrieved from http://www.foxnews.com/
  54. Southern Poverty Law Center. (n.d.) Alt-right. SPLC: Southern Poverty Law Center. Retrieved from https://www.splcenter.org/.
  55. Spivak, G. C. (2003). Can the subaltern speak? Die Philosophin, 14(27), 42–58.Google Scholar
  56. Strauss, V. (2017, August 23). Arizona’s ban on Mexican American studies was racist, U.S. court rules. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/
  57. Suspitsyna, T. (2010). Purposes of higher education and visions of the nation in the writings of the Department of Education. In E. J. Allan, S. Iverson, & R. Ropers-Huilman (Eds.), Reconstructing policy in higher education: Feminist poststructural perspectives (pp. 63–79). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  58. Sweeney, C. (2016, December 20). How liberal professors are ruining college. Boston Magazine. Retrieved from www.bostonmagazine.com/
  59. Wahba, P. (2015, March 16). Starbucks to encourage baristas to discuss race relations with customers. Fortune, Retrieved from http://fortune.com/
  60. Wise, T. (2010). Colorblind: The rise of post-racial politics and the retreat from racial equity. San Francisco: City Lights Books.Google Scholar
  61. Wodak, R. (2001). What CDA is about – A summary of its history, important concepts and its development. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 1–13). Thousand Oaks: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Teacher Education ProgramColorado Mountain CollegeGlenwood SpringsUSA
  2. 2.School of Applied LeadershipCity University of SeattleSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations