Advertisement

Language-Content Integration Across School Subjects: Approaches to Teaching English Language Learners

  • Luciana C. de OliveiraEmail author
  • Kathryn M. Obenchain
  • Rachael H. Kenney
  • Alandeom W. Oliveira
Chapter
Part of the English Language Education book series (ELED, volume 17)

Abstract

This chapter provides an introduction to the present book. In an effort to provide practitioners with guidance on such pedagogical endeavor, this collection examines how the educators of varied academic disciplines (English language arts, mathematics, science, and social studies) approach the creation and implementation of curriculum spaces at the intersection of language and content. Our vision for this book was one of theory-based practice wherein descriptions of pedagogical approaches were accompanied by explicit accounts of the authors’ theoretical underpinnings and epistemic/linguistic stance.

References

  1. Applebee, A. N., & Langer, J. A. (2011a). The national study of writing instruction: Methods and procedures. Albany, NY: Center on English Learning & Achievement, University at Albany.Google Scholar
  2. Applebee, A. N., & Langer, J. A. (2011b). A snapshot of writing instruction in middle and high school. English Journal, 100(6), 14–27.Google Scholar
  3. Aubusson, P. J., & Fogwill, S. (2006). Role play as analogical modeling in science. In P. J. Aubusson, A. G. Harrison, & S. M. Ritchie (Eds.), Metaphor and analogy in science education (pp. 93–104). Dordrecht: The Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bailey, S., & Watson, R. (1998). Establishing basic ecological understanding in younger pupils: A pilot evaluation of a strategy based on drama/role play. International Journal of Science Education, 20, 139–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  6. Cross, R. (2016). Language and content ‘integration’: The affordances of additional languages as a tool within a single curriculum space. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 48(3), 388–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dorion, K. R. (2009). Science through drama: A multiple case exploration of the characteristics of drama activities used in secondary science lessons. International Journal of Science Education, 31, 2247–2270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2008). Word wise and content rich: Five essential steps to teaching academic vocabulary. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  9. Gilbert, S. W., & Ireton, S. W. (2003). Understanding models in earth and space science. Arlington, VA: NSTA press.Google Scholar
  10. Graves, M. F., August, D., & Mancilla-Martinez, J. (2013). Teaching vocabulary to English language learners. New York, NY: Teachers College Press, Center for Applied Linguistics, International Reading Association, & TESOL International Association.Google Scholar
  11. Höffler, T. N., & Leutner, D. (2007). Instructional animation versus static pictures: A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 17, 722–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Honigsfeld, A., & Dove, M. G. (2010). Collaboration and co-teaching: Strategies for English learners. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.Google Scholar
  13. Langer, J. A. (2011). Envisioning knowledge: Building literacy in the academic disciplines. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  14. Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
  15. Lowe, R. K., & Schnotz, W. (2008). Learning with animation: Research and design implications. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Reichen, B., Oliveira, A. W., Oliver, G., & Florencio-Wain, A. (2016). Promoting English language acquisition in secondary mathematics through dialogic integration of instructional technology. In M. Urban & D. Falvo (Eds.), Improving K-12 STEM education outcomes through technological integration (pp. 68–85). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Scheffler, I. (1991). Basic mathematical skills). In I. Scheffler (Ed.), In Praise of the cognitive emotions and other essays in the philosophy of education. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Shanahan, T., & Shanahan, C. (2008). Teaching disciplinary literacy to adolescents: Rethinking content-area literacy. Harvard Education Review, 78(1), 40–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Varelas, M., Pappas, C. C., Tucker-Raymond, E., Kane, J., Hankes, J., Ortiz, I., … Keblawe-Shamah, N. ( 2010). Drama activities as ideational resources for primary-grade children in urban science classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 302–325.Google Scholar
  21. Voloshinov, V. N. (1995). Marxism and the philosophy of language, Bakhtinian thought: An introductory reader. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luciana C. de Oliveira
    • 1
    Email author
  • Kathryn M. Obenchain
    • 2
  • Rachael H. Kenney
    • 3
  • Alandeom W. Oliveira
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Teaching and Learning, School of Education and Human DevelopmentUniversity of MiamiCoral GablesUSA
  2. 2.Department of Curriculum and Instruction; Learning, Engagement, and Global Initiatives, College of EducationPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA
  3. 3.Department of Mathematics and Department of Curriculum & InstructionPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA
  4. 4.Educational Theory and Practice DepartmentState University of New York at AlbanyAlbanyUSA

Personalised recommendations