Advertisement

Teaching Creativity in the Context of a Business School

  • Andrew JacksonEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 532)

Abstract

This paper discusses the teaching of creative skills to students who are primarily based within the discipline of business and management. The paper first reviews the way that students have been conventionally taught in the “art school” system in the UK, expanding on the theoretical frameworks that underpin this approach. This is then contrasted with the conventional academic approach found in Business Schools. Finally, an account is given of how a module influenced by the art school atelier system has been developed that bridges this gap, explaining how the module is taught in a business school context, and reflecting on the experiences of the staff and students who take part in the module.

Keywords

Creativity Teaching and learning Atelier 

References

  1. 1.
    N. Anderson, K. Potočnik, J. Zhou, Innovation and creativity in organizations. J. Manag. 40(5), 1297–1333 (2014)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    G. McCracken, Chief Culture Officer: How to Create a Living Breathing Corporation (Basic Books, New York, 2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    C. Bilton, Management and Creativity (Blackwell, Malden, 2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    N. Perlroth, Solving problems for real world, using design. New York Times (2013), https://search.proquest.com/docview/1471319854
  5. 5.
    M.S. Knowles, The Modern Practice of Adult Education (Association Press, Chicago, 1980)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. Biggs, What the student does: Teaching for enhanced learning. High. Educ. Res. Dev. 18(1), 57–75 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    K. Badenhausen, Apple heads the world’s most valuable brands of 2017 at $170 billion. Forbes.com (2017), https://www.forbes.com/sites/kurtbadenhausen/2017/05/23/apple-heads-the-worlds-most-valuable-brands-of-2017-at-170-billion
  8. 8.
    J.A. Schmiechen, Reconsidering the factory, art-labor, and the schools of design in nineteenth-century Britain. Des. Issues 6(4), 58–69 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    D. Haste, The Art Schools of Kent (Werter Press, London, 2013)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    E.F. Barkley, Student Engagement Techniques (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, 2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    N. Weaver, The Atelier Principle in Teaching. Symposium on New Directions of Architectural Education - The Necessity of a Cultural Paradigm Responsive to the Majority (Delhi, India, 1999)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    D.Z. Belluigi, Constructions of roles in studio teaching and learning. Int. J. Art Design Edu. 35(1), 21–35 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    L.N. Green, E. Bonollo, Studio-based teaching: History and advantages in the teaching of design. World Trans. Eng. Technol. Edu. 2(2), 269–272 (2003)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    M. Dahlén, S. Rosengren, F. Törn, Advertising creativity matters. J. Advert. Res. 48(3), 392–403 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    A.F. Osborn, Applied Imagination, 3rd rev. edn. (Scribner, New York, 1963)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    E. De Bono, Lateral Thinking (Harper Perennial, New York, 1990)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    E. De Bono, Serious Creativity (Schäffer-Poeschel, Stuttgart, 1996)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    T. Buzan, B. Buzan, The Mind Map Book (BBC, London, 2001)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    B. Eno, P. Schmidt, Oblique Strategies (Self-published, 2001)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    IDEO, IDEO Method Cards (IDEO, London, 2003)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    ZKK for Channel 4 (Producer), S. Foster (Director), (2009), Advertising uncut programme 2: Where do ideas come from? [Video/DVD]Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    G. Nyilasy, L.N. Reid, The academician–practitioner gap in advertising. Int. J. Advert. 26(4), 425–445 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    A. Tibbs, Advertising: Its Business, Culture and Careers (Routledge, London, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    J. Adams, Conceptual Block Busting (Perseus Books, Massachusetts, 1986)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    R.M. Ryan, E.L. Deci, Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am. Psychol. 55(1), 68–78 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    T. Marchese, The New Conversations About Learning, ed. by B. Cambridge. Assessing Impact: Evidence and Action (American Association for Higher Education, Washington, DC, 1997) pp. 79–95Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Canterbury Christ Church UniversityCanterburyUK

Personalised recommendations