Advertisement

A Study of Digital Science Fiction Prototyping in an Elementary School Setting

  • Carrie Lane
  • Juliette Solis
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 532)

Abstract

This paper will focus on a new approach to teaching that integrates digital literacy and science fiction into elementary school settings. The approach combines elements of constructivist teaching methods, Science Fiction Prototyping (SFP), the exquisite corpse model and social media to engage young learners. This paper includes background information gathered from previous literature on the effects of constructivist approaches and new technological advances within classroom environments and then analyzes the effects of a new platform called MySciFiStory.com that hopes to combine these approaches to benefit elementary students and educators.

Keywords

Science fiction prototyping Exquisite corpse model Social media Collaborative learning 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The researchers of this paper would like to thank Victor Callaghan for his guidance and support throughout the creation of MySciFiStory.com and this paper and CSF for their innovative and creative approaches to teaching content. They would also like to thank Dr. Minjuan Wang for her support and guidance throughout this research project and the original concept development process. Many thanks are given to Peter von dem Hagen for his help developing the initial MySciFiStory.com concept, design document and prototype and to Angeles Gomez for her help creating the initial MySciFiStory.com documents. Lastly, the researchers would like to thank all the students, teachers, and administrators who participated in the testing of the prototype of MySciFiStory.com.

References

  1. 1.
    A.P. McGlynn, Strategies: Motivating the disengaged student; part one: Challenging passivity and resistance to learning. Hispanic Outlook High. Educ. 24(9) (1999)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    C. Lane, J. Solis, P. Von Dem Hagen, A. Gomez, MySciFiStory.com internal design document (2017)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    International Association for Development of the Information Society, Proceedings of the International Association for Development of the Information Society (IADIS) International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age (CELDA) (IADIS, Madrid, 2012), p. 308Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    K. Crotty, Educational theory constructivism (2012)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    S.P. Power, Constructivism defined and implications for the classroom, Master’s thesis, Memorial University of Newfoundland, 1997Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    M.M. Chang, Role of explanations and student-centered interaction in science learning: An applied constructivist approach to instructional design, Doctoral dissertation, Syracuse University, 1993Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. Pedersen, D. Williams, A comparison of assessment practices and their effects on learning and motivation in a student-centered learning environment. J. Educ. Multimed. Hypermed. 3(13), 283–306 (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    C. Confer, Student participation in a process of teacher change: Toward student-centered teaching and learning, Doctoral dissertation, State University of New York at Albany, 2000Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    M.A. Abdelaziz, A.E. Riad, M.B. Senousy, Challenges and issues in building virtual reality-based e-learning system. Int. J. E-Educ. E-Bus. E-Manag. E-Learn. 4(4), 320–329 (2014)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    D. Siegle, Using QR codes to differentiate learning for gifted and talented students. Gift. Child Today 38(1), 63–66 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. Qayyum Ch, T. Hussain, Z. Mahmood, M.S. Rasool, et al., Bull. Educ. Res. 2(38), 203–209 (2016)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    M. Honey, G. Pearson, H. Schweingruber, STEM Integration in K-12 Education: Status, Prospects, and an Agenda for Research (National Academies Press, Washington D.C, 2014)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    C. Liao, From interdisciplinary to transdisciplinary: An arts-integrated approach to STEAM education. Art Educ. 69(6), 44–49 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    B.D. Johnson, Science Fiction Prototyping: Designing the Future with Science Fiction (Morgan & Claypool, San Rafael, 2011)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    D.A. Smith, Reaching nonscience students through science fiction. Phys. Teach. 47(5), 302–305 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    M. C. McShane, Exquisite corpse: The surrealist practice of collective drawing, 1925–1941, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Emory University, Atlanta, 2004Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    P. Wilson, Not so exquisite corpses: Character invention and development in the creative writing class. Engl. Educ. 35(3), 7–12 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    C. Cynn, Forest of stories: An experimental science fiction documentary of stories, Documentary, United States (2011)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ö.G. Ulum, A descriptive content analysis of the extent of Bloom’s taxonomy in the reading comprehension questions of the course book Q: Skills for success 4 reading and writing. Qual. Rep. 21(9), 1674–1683 (2016)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    D.R. Beas, Do we really need virtual reality (VR) in education? in Express Computer (2016)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carrie Lane
    • 1
  • Juliette Solis
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Journalism and Media Studies, San Diego State UniversitySan DiegoUSA

Personalised recommendations