Effective Communication Between Human and Dolphin Using Information Devices

  • Aya KuritaEmail author
  • Tetsuro Ogi
  • Hiroaki Daigo
  • Yasue Odaka
  • Naoko Daigo
  • Isao Ooshita
  • Shuto Haneda


The dolphin is an animal that we are interested in researching and have established various relationships with for a very long time. They are known as one of the smartest animals, and diverse research about their cognitive ability has been reported from many different viewpoints. In particular, their visual perception and characteristics of visibility of panels on which some figures are printed have been studied, but as yet their perception of information device screens has not. We attempted to reveal their ability to perceive information through pictures displayed on a screen in order to utilize information devices effectively for research and communication in the future. We displayed two kinds of target pictures on the screen to a female bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) and assigned a particular action of the subject to each picture. We switched the pictures in front of her and recorded her reactions as a success rate and how she would act in case of failure. Ultimately, she proved that she understands the concept of information devices, and it is expected to be further established that dolphins perceive dynamic information more easily than static information.


Dolphin Cognitive ability Visual perception Information device Communication 



This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP 16K12480. We are grateful to Yukiko Hori, the Director of Enoshima Aquarium, and the staff in charge of keeping the dolphins for their willing cooperation in offering us the opportunity to carry out our experiments.


  1. 1.
    Aoki K, Amano M, Yoshioka M, Mori K, Tokuda D, Miyazaki N (2007) Diel diving behavior of sperm whales off Japan. Mar Ecol Progr Ser 349:277–287. Alexander, 1992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bacher K, Kruetzen M, Allen S, Bejder L, Kruetzen M, Lindholm AK (2010) Genes or culture: are mitochondrial genes associated with tool use in bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops sp.)? Behav Genet 40(5):706–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Breder CM (1926) The locomotion of fishes. Zoologica 4:159–297Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Carwardine M (1996) Whales, dolphins and porpoises. Dorling Kindersley, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Connor RC (2007) Dolphin social intelligence: complex alliance relationships in bottlenose dolphins and a consideration of selective environments for extreme brain size evolution in mammals. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 362(1480):587–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Elias H, Schwartz D (1969) Surface areas of the cerebral cortex of mammals determined by stereological methods. Science 166(3901):111–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Foer J, Brian S (2015) Dolphin intelligence. Nat Geogr Mag 227:40–64Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fowler S (1980) The Clever Hans phenomenon conference. Int J Study Anim Probl 1(6):355–359Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Frère CH, Krützen M, Mann J, Watson-Capps JJ, Tsai YJ, Patterson EM, Connor R, Bejder L, Sherwin WB (2010) Home range overlap, matrilineal and biparental kinship drive female associations in bottlenose dolphins. Anim Behav 80(3):481–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Harley EH, Putman AE, Roitblat LH (2003) Bottlenose dolphins perceive object features through echolocation. Nature 424:667–669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Howell AB (1930) Myology of the narwhal (Monodon monoceros). Dev Dyn 46(2):187–215Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Huston PJ, Borbély AA (1974) The thalamic rat: general behavior, operant learning with rewarding hypothalamic stimulation, and effects of amphetamine. Physiol Behav 12:433–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Inoue S, Matsuzawa T (2009) Acquisition and mamory of sequence order in young and adult chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Anim Cogn 12(Suppl 1):S59–S69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kano F, Tomonaga M (2009) How chimpanzees look at pictures: a comparative eye-tracking study. Proc R Soc Britain 276:1949–1955CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Koehl BR (1986) A marinescape floor from the palace at Knossos. American J Archaeol 90(4):407–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kojeszewski T, Fish FE (2007) Swimming kinematics of the Florida manatee (Trichechus manatus latirostris): hydrodynamic analysis of an undulatory mammalian swimmer. J Exp Biol 210:2411–2418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Konno A, Asahina T (2005) Discrimination of achromatic colors in a bottlenose dolphin (in Japanese). Jap J Anim Psychol 55(2):59–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kruetzen M, Sherwin WB, Mann J, Heithaus MR, Connor RC, Bejder L (2005) Cultural transmission of tool use in bottlenose dolphins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102(25):8939–8943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kuczaj SA II, Gory JD, Xitco MJ Jr (2009) How intelligent are dolphins? A partial answer based on their ability to plan their behavior when confronted with novel problems. Jap J Anim Psychol 59(1):99–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lilly JC (1962) Vocal behavior of the bottlenose dolphin. Proc Am Philos Soc 106(6):520–529Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Martinez AEV, McDonnell SM (2017) Evaluation of operant learning in young foals using target training. Appl Anim Behav Sci 193:67–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    McCowan B, Marino L, Vance E, Walke L, Reiss D (2000) Bubble ring play of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus): implications for cognition. J Comp Psychol 114(1):98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Miller PJO, Shapiro AD, Tyack PL, Solow AR (2004) Call-type matching in vocal exchanges of free-ranging resident killer whales, Orcinus orca. Anim Behav 67(6):1099–1107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Morisaka T (2007) Current cognitive studies on cetaceans. Jap J Anim Psychol 57(1):41–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Murakami T, Fujii Y, Katsumata H, Arai K, Soichi M (2008) Formation of symmetry in Beluga (in Japanese). Cogn Stud 15(3):358–365Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ogawa H, Hirabayashi A (1995) Admissibility of memorization learning with respect to projestion learning (in Japanese). Neurocomputing 95(135):25–32Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Reiss D, Marino L (2001) Mirror self-recognition in the bottlenose dolphin: a case of cognitive convergence. Proc Nat Acad Sci 98(10):5937–5942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rendell L, Whitehead H (2001) Culture in whales and dolphins. Behav Brain Sci 24(2):309–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Roth G, Dicke U (2005) Evolution of the brain and intelligence. Trends Cogn Sci 9(5):250–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Skinner BF (1938) The behavior of organisms. An experimental analysis. Skinner Foundation, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sokolowski MBC, Abramson CI (2010) From foraging to operant conditioning: a new computer-controlled Skinner box to study free-flying nectar gathering behavior in bees. J Neurosci Method 188:235–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Teilmann J, Christiansen CT, Kjellerup S, Dietz R, Nachman G (2013) Geographic, seasonal, and diurnal surface behavior of harbor porpoises. Mar Mammal Sci 29(2):E60–E76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Thompson RKR, Herman LM (1975) Underwater frequency discrimination in the bottlenosed dolphin (1–140 kHz) and the human (1–8 kHz). J Acoust Soc Am 57(4):943–948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Tian H, Li C, Mohammad MA, Cui YL, Mi WT, Yang Y, Xie D, Ren TL (2014) Graphene earphones: entertainment for both humans and animals. ACS Nano 8(6):5883–5890CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Tun T (2008) Castnet fishing with the help of Irrawaddy Dolphin, Orcaella brevirostris, in Myanmar. Proc Design Symp Conserv Ecosyst 2:39–45Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Von Schulte HW, Smith MF (1918) The external characters, skeletal muscles, and peripheral nerves of Kogia breviceps (Blainville). Bull Am Museum Nat History 38:7–72Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    William TM, Friedl WA, Fong ML, Yamada RM, Sedivy P, Haun JE (1992) Travel at low energetic cost by swimming and wave-riding bottlenose dolphins. Nature 355(6363):821–823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Yim H, Cho SY, Guang X, Kang GS, Jeong J, Cha S, Oh H, Lee J, Yang CE, Kwon KK, Kim JY, Kim WT, Kim W, Jeon HJ, Kim S, Choi HD, Jho S, Kim H, Ko J, Kim H, Shin Y, Jung H, Zheng Y, Wang Z, Chen Y, Chen M, Jiang A, Li E, Zhang S, Hou H, Kim HT, Yu L, Liu S, Ahn K, Cooper J, Park S, Hong PC, Jin W, Kim H, Park C, Lee K, Chun S, Morin AP, O’Brien JS, Lee H, Kimura J, Moon YD, Manica A, Edwards J, Kim CB, Kim S, Wang J, Bhak J, Lee SH, Lee J (2014) Minke whale genome and aquatic adaptation in cetaceans. Nat Genet 46(1):88–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aya Kurita
    • 1
    Email author
  • Tetsuro Ogi
    • 1
  • Hiroaki Daigo
    • 2
  • Yasue Odaka
    • 3
  • Naoko Daigo
    • 3
  • Isao Ooshita
    • 4
  • Shuto Haneda
    • 4
  1. 1.Graduate School of System Design and ManagementKeio. Collaboration ComplexKohoku-ku, Yokohama-shiJapan
  2. 2.Sony CorporationTokyoJapan
  3. 3.Design Domain Japan CorporationTokyoJapan
  4. 4.Enoshima AquariumFujisawa-shiJapan

Personalised recommendations