Advertisement

Visualization of “Skills for Living Smart” for Methodology Development to Improve Skills

  • Masanori KataokaEmail author
  • Iwane Maida
  • Tetsuya Toma
Chapter

Abstract

Many people today have trouble socializing and feel uncomfortable and unsatisfied with human relations. Additionally, people must accomplish their life goals within a limited time frame. Based on seminars held to improve skills for “living smart,” the authors felt that the social demands of living smart are increasing. This research attempts to visualize the skills for living smart in order to develop a methodology to improve these skills. An inductive approach clarified that “skills for living smart” comprise two factors: “entry into the environment” and “breakthrough strength.” We extracted seven components of “entry into the environment” (“participation ability,” “setup force,” “future force,” “antenna power,” “chameleon power,” “enchanting power,” and “cheerleading power”) and five components of “breakthrough strength” (“incredible ability,” “first impression ability,” “rising power,” “ability to grasp the heart,” and “boosting power”). We also demonstrated the continued effectiveness of the Seminar for Living Smart training. Visualizing skills for living smart are expected to facilitate future development of methodologies to improve these skills.

Keywords

Street-smart skills Entry into the environment Breakthrough strength Methodology for improving street-smart skills Visualization 

References

  1. 1.
    Goto M, Miyagi H, Daibo I (2004) The effectiveness of social skills training: the cluster analysis about changes of participants’ rating score. Techn Rep IEICE HCS 104:7–12Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sako T, Noro C, Ito K (2007) WHO global competency model. J Mie Prefectural Coll Nurs 11:93–99Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yachi A (2001) Rationale and reliability of the competency model as the new meritocracy. Bus Rev Fac Bus Adm Bunkyo Gakuin Univ 11:49–62Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Spencer LM, Spencer SM (1993) Competence at Work WillyGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (2006). Research concerning basic skills for workers: interim summary. www.meti.go.jp/policy/kisoryoku/chukanhon.pdf
  6. 6.
    Goldstein AP, Sprafkin RF, Gershaw NJ, Klein P, (1980) Skill-streaming the adolescent: a structured learning approach to teaching prosocial skills. Research Press, Illinois, pp 220Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Daibo I (2003) Introductory note of the method of social skills training: for adaptive building of interpersonal relationships. Japan J Interpers Soc Psychol 3:1–8Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    McClelland DC (1973) Testing for competence rather than for intelligence. Am Psychol 28:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shimamoto K, Ishii M (2006) Development of a daily life skills scale for college students. Japan J Educ Psychol 54:211–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mayer JD, Salovey P (1997) What is emotional intelligence? In: Salovey P, Sluyter D (eds) Emotional development and emotional intelligence. Basic Books, New York, pp 3–31Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hirano M (2010) A study of the classification of resilience factors: development of the bidimensional resilience scale (BRS). Japan J Pers 19(2):94–106Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Murata A, Moriwaka M (2011) Basic study on relationship between SI, EI and ability to behave. Trans Jpn Soc Kansei Eng 10:489–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fujimori T (1980) Effects of attitude similarity and topic importance on interpersonal attraction-with relation to the dimensions of attraction. Soc Psychol 20:35–43Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nakamura M (1988) Attraction to a Dissimilar Other. The Japanese Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 27 (2):121–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hayashi F (1978) The fundamental dimensions of interpersonal cognitive structure. Bull Fac Educ Dept Educ Psychol Nagoya Univ 25:233–247Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.System Design and Management Research InstituteKeio UniversityYokohamaJapan
  2. 2.Graduate School of System Design and ManagementKeio UniversityYokohamaJapan

Personalised recommendations