Advertisement

Logical Empiricism and Art: The Correspondence Otto Neurath/Meyer Schapiro

  • Hans-Joachim DahmsEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science book series (BSPS, volume 336)

Abstract

Logical Positivists had a very lively interest in the revolutionary science of their time, but also in modern art and especially in ‘international style’ architecture. Surprisingly they never published a representative volume or longer statement on art and architecture. But: it is not well known that Otto Neurath, their leading organizer and spokesman, invited the (later on) eminent art historian and critic Meyer Schapiro (professor at Columbia University NY) to contribute a volume on art to the International Encyclopedia of Unified Science. Schapiro failed to deliver the promised book. But from the extended correspondence and some material in the Schapiro papers one can describe the general direction the thing would have taken. The correspondence is also very interesting, because it also covers questions of the endangered peace and the approaching war, the academic scene in Europe and in the USA, and surprisingly: Martin Heidegger. Neurath died in 1945, but Schapiro came back to the Heidegger theme in 1968 when he wrote his famous harsh criticism of Heidegger’s programmatic long paper “Das Kunstwerk” (the work of art) where he interprets one of Van Gogh’s shoe-paintings. Schapiro’s short article caused much controversy then (even Jacques Derrida intervened).

References

  1. Arntz, Gerd. 1982. Otto Neurath, ich, und die Bildstatistik. In Arbeiterbildung in der Zwischenkriegszeit: Otto Neurath, Gerd Arntz, ed. Friedrich Stadler, 31–34. Wien-München: Löcker.Google Scholar
  2. ———. 1988. Zeit unterm Messer: Holz- und Linolschnitte 1920–1970. Köln: Leske Verlag.Google Scholar
  3. Batchen, Geoffrey. 2009. What of Shoes? Van Gogh and Art History. Leipzig: E.A. Seemann.Google Scholar
  4. Bernhard, Peter. 2015. Zur “inneren Verwandtschaft” von Neopositivismus und Neuem Bauen. In Architektur und Philosophie. Grundlagen, Standpunkte, Perspektiven, ed. Jörg Gleiter and Ludger Schwarte, 162–175, 267–275. Bielefeld: Transcript.Google Scholar
  5. ———. 2019a. ‘Sie diskutieren sehr gern, aber sehr dilettantisch.’ Carnaps Vorträge am Bauhaus. In Logical Empiricism, Life Reform, and the German Youth Movement, ed. Christian Damböck, Günther Sandner, and Meike Werner. Cham: Springer (Forthcoming).Google Scholar
  6. ———. 2019b. Carnap und das Bauhaus. In Young Carnap in an Historical Context: 1918–1935, ed. Christian Damböck and Gereon Wolters. Veröffentlichungen des Instituts Wiener Kreis. Dordrecht: D. Reidel (Forthcoming).Google Scholar
  7. Carnap, Rudolf. 1928/2003. 1928/2003. The Logical Structure of the World. Trans. R. George. Chicago, Ill.: Open Court.Google Scholar
  8. ———. 1932/1959. The elimination of metaphysics through logical analysis of language. In Logical Positivism, ed. A. J. Ayer, 60–81. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  9. Carnap, Rudolf, Hans Hahn, and Otto Neurath. 1929/1973. The scientific conception of the world: The Vienna circle. In Empiricism and sociology, ed. Marie Neurath and Robert S. Cohen, 299–318. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
  10. Dahms, Hans-Joachim. 1994. Positivismusstreit. In Die Auseinandersetzungen der Frankfurter Schule mit dem logischen Positivismus, dem amerikanischen Pragmatismus und dem kritischen Rationalismus. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  11. ———. 1997. Felix Kaufmann und der Physikalismus. In Phänomenologie und Logischer Empirismus. Zentenarium Felix Kaufmann (1895–1949), ed. Friedrich Stadler, 97–114. Wien/New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  12. ———. 1999. Otto Neuraths ‘International Encyclopedia of Unified Science’ als Torso. Bemerkungen über die geplanten, aber nicht erschienenen, Monographien der Enzyklopädie. In Otto Neurath: Rationalität, Planung, Vielfalt, ed. Elisabeth Nemeth and Richard Heinrich, 184–227. Wien-Berlin: Oldenbourg/Akademie.Google Scholar
  13. ———. 2004. Neue Sachlichkeit in the architecture and philosophy of the 1920s. In Carnap Brought Home. The View from Jena, ed. Steve Awodey and Carsten Klein, 357–375. Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
  14. ———. 2019. Rudolf Carnap: Philosopher of ‘Neue Sachlichkeit.’ In Young Carnap in an Historical Context: 1918–1935, ed. Christian Damböck and Gereon Wolters. Veröffentlichungen des Instituts Wiener Kreis. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
  15. Dahms, Hans-Joachim, and Michael Neumann. 1994. Sozialwissenschaftler und Philosophen in der Münchener Räterepublik. In Jahrbuch für Soziologiegeschichte 1992, ed. Carsten Klingemann et al., 115–146. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  16. Dahms, Hans-Joachim, and Friedrich Stadler. 2015. Die Philosophie an der Universität Wien von 1848 bis zur Gegenwart. In Universität –Forschung – Lehre. Themen und Perspektiven im langen 20 Jahrhundert (= 650 Jahre Universität Wien – Aufbruch ins neue Jahrhundert. Band 1), ed. Katharina Kniefacz, Elisabeth Nemeth, Herbert Posch, Friedrich Stadler, 77–132. Wien: V&R unipress.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Derrida, Jacques. 1978/1987. The Truth in Painting. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  18. Friedman, Michael. 2000. A Parting of the Ways. Carnap, Cassirer, and Heidegger. Chicago/La Salle: Open Court.Google Scholar
  19. Galison, Galison. 1990. Aufbau/Bauhaus: Logical Positivism and Architectural Modernism. Critical Inquiry 16: 709–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Goodman, Nelson. 1968. Languages of Art: An Approach to a Theory of Symbols. Indianapolis: The Bobbs-Merrill Company.Google Scholar
  21. Gordon, Peter. 2010. Continental Divide. Heidegger, Cassirer, Davos. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Guttenplan, D. D. 2013. When Sartre and Camus met Hoover’s G-men. The New York Times, 08 September 2013.Google Scholar
  23. Haller, Rudolf. 1993. Neopositivismus. Eine historische Einführung in die Philosophie des Wiener Kreises. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
  24. Heidegger, Martin. 1950. Der Ursprung des Kunstwerks. In Holzwege, 7–68. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.Google Scholar
  25. Holly, Michael Ann. 1997. Schapiro Style. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 55 (1): 6–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Martin, Andy. 2012. Sartre and Camus in New York. The New York Times, 14 July 2012.Google Scholar
  27. Neurath, Otto. 1931/1973. Empirical Sociology. In Empiricism and Sociology, ed. Marie Neurath and Robert S. Cohen, 319–421. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
  28. ———. 1944/1970. Foundations of the social sciences. In Foundations of the Unity of science: Volume 1, 1–51. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  29. Neurath, Paul. 2004. Die Gesellschaft des Terros. Innenansichten der Konzentrationslager Dachau und Buchenwald, ed. Christian Fleck and Nico Stehr. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  30. Nierhaus, Andreas, Eva-Maria Orosz, and Anita Aigner. 2012. Werkbundsiedlung Wien 1932. Ein Manifest des neuen Wohnens. Wien: Müry Salzmann.Google Scholar
  31. Radkau, Joachim. 2011. Max Weber. A Biography. Cambridge and Malden: Polity.Google Scholar
  32. Roh, Franz. 1962. Entartete Kunst. Kunstbarbarei im Dritten Reich. Hannover: Fackelträger.Google Scholar
  33. Sandner, Günther. 2014. Otto Neurath. Eine politische Biographie. Wien: Zsolnay.Google Scholar
  34. Schapiro, Meyer. 1945. A Note on Max Weber’s Politics. Politics 2 (2): 44–48.Google Scholar
  35. ———. 1950. Vincent van Gogh. New York: Harry N. Abrams.Google Scholar
  36. ———. 1968. The still life as a personal object – A note on Heidegger and van Gogh. In The reach of the mind: Essays in memory of Kurt Goldstein, ed. M.L. Simmel, 203–209. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  37. ———. 1994a. The still life as a personal object – A note on Heidegger and van Gogh. In Selected papers IV: Theory and philosophy of art: Style, artist, and society, 135–142. New York: George Braziller.Google Scholar
  38. ———. 1994b. Further notes on Heidegger and van Gogh. In Selected papers IV: Theory and philosophy of art: Style, artist, and society, 143–152. New York: George Braziller.Google Scholar
  39. ———. 1999a. Selected papers V: Worldview in painting – Art and society. New York: George Braziller.Google Scholar
  40. ———. 1999b. Philosophy and Worldview in Painting. In Schapiro (1999a): 11–73.Google Scholar
  41. Stadler, Friedrich. 1995. Wissenschaftliche Weltauffassung und Kunst: Zur werttheoretischen Dimension im Wiener Kries. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 43: 635–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Thun-Hohenstein, Christoph, Hermann Czech, and Sebastian Hackenschmidt, eds. 2016. Josef Frank. Against design. Das anti-formalistische Werk des Architekten. Trans. Eva Ciabattoni et al. Basel: Birkhäuser Verlag GmbH.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute Vienna CircleViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations