Advertisement

Conclusions and Implications for the Region and Beyond

  • Christian Hagemann
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics book series (PSEUP)

Abstract

This chapter summarizes the results of both the fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis as well as the two process tracing case studies. It discusses the plausibility of the findings against the backdrop of competing hypothesis. It then specifies the contribution of the results to the field of Europeanization studies, post-communist transformation, and pre-accession reforms. It closes with the potential transferability of the findings to the context of the old member states and hints and interesting avenues for future research in this field.

Keywords

Europeanization studies Post-communist transformation Pre-accession reforms 

References

  1. Bachtler, J., Mendez, C., & Oraže, H. (2014). From Conditionality to Europeanization in Central and Eastern Europe: Administrative Performance and Capacity in Cohesion Policy. European Planning Studies, 22(4), 735–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berg-Schlosser, D., De Meur, G., Rihoux, B., & Ragin, C. C. (2009). Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) as an Approach. In B. Rihoux & C. C. Ragin (Eds.), Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques (pp. 1–18). London et al.: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Bloom, S., & Petrova, V. (2013). National Subversion of Supranational Goals: ‘Pork-Barrel’ Politics and EU Regional Aid. Europe-Asia Studies, 65(8), 1599–1620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bodenstein, T., & Kemmerling, A. (2011). Ripples in a Rising Tide: Why Some EU Regions Receive More Structural Funds Than Others. European Integration Online Papers, 16(1). http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2012-001a.htm. Accessed Jan 2016.
  5. Börzel, T. A., & Schimmelfennig, F. (2017). Coming Together or Drifting Apart? The EU’s Political Integration Capacity in Eastern Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 24(2), 278–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Börzel, T. A., & Sedelmeier, U. (2017). Larger and More Law Abiding? The Impact of Enlargement on Compliance in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 24(2), 197–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Börzel, T. A., Dimitrova, A., & Schimmelfennig, F. (2017). European Union Enlargement and Integration Capacity: Concepts, Findings, and Policy Implications. Journal of European Public Policy, 24(2), 157–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bouvet, F., & Dall’Erba, S. (2010). European Regional Structural Funds: How Large Is the Influence of Politics on the Allocation Process? JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 48(3), 501–528.Google Scholar
  9. Chalmers, A. W. (2013). Regional Authority, Transnational Lobbying and the Allocation of Structural Funds in the European Union. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 51(5), 815–831.Google Scholar
  10. Charron, N., Lapuente, V., & Dijkstra, L. (2012). Regional Governance Matters: A Study on Regional Variation in Quality of Government Within the EU. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/work/2012_02_governance.pdf. Accessed 10 Nov 2018.
  11. CZ1. (2015). Interview in Prague with Policy Expert on 14 May 2015.Google Scholar
  12. Dellmuth, L. M. (2011). The Cash Divide: The Allocation of European Union Regional Grants. Journal of European Public Policy, 18(7), 1016–1033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dellmuth, L. M., & Stoffel, M. F. (2012). Distributive Politics and Intergovernmental Transfers: The Local Allocation of European Union Structural Funds. European Union Politics, 13(3), 413–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dimitrova, A., & Toshkov, D. (2009). Post-accession Compliance Between Administrative Co-ordination and Political Bargaining. European Integration Online Papers, 13, Article 19. http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2009-019a.htm. Accessed Jan 2016.
  15. Ekiert, G., & Hanson, S. E. (Eds.). (2003). Capitalism and Democracy in Central and Eastern Europe: Assessing the Legacy of Communist Rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. European Commission. (2017). My Region, My Europe, Our Future. Seventh Report on Economic, Social and Territorial Cohesion. Brussels: European Commission, Directorate-General Regional and Urban Policy. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docoffic/official/reports/cohesion7/short_7cr_en.pdf. Accessed 20 June 2018.
  17. Falkner, G., & Treib, O. (2008). Three Worlds of Compliance or Four? The EU-15 Compared to New Member States. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 46(2), 293–313.Google Scholar
  18. Falkner, G., Treib, O., & Holzleithner, E. (2008). Compliance in the Enlarged European Union: Living Rights or Dead Letters? Aldershot and Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  19. Ferry, M., & Kah, S. (2017). Research for REGI-Lessons Learnt from the Closure of the 2007–13 Programming Period. Brussels. http://doi.org/10.2861/25187.
  20. Goetz, K. H., & Wollmann, H. (2001). Governmentalizing Central Executives in Post-communist Europe: A Four-Country Comparison. Journal of European Public Policy, 8(6), 864–887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jahn, D., & Müller-Rommel, F. (2010). Political Institutions and Policy Performance: A Comparative Analysis of Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of Public Policy, 30(1), 23–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kitschelt, H. (2001). Divergent Paths of Postcommunist Democracies. In L. Diamond & R. Gunther (Eds.), Political Parties and Democracy (pp. 299–323). Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Kitschelt, H., Mansfeldová, Z., Markovski, R., & Toka, G. (1999). Post-communist Party Systems: Competition, Representation, and Inter-Party Cooperation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kopecký, P., & Spirova, M. (2011). ‘Jobs for the Boys’? Patterns of Party Patronage in Post-communist Europe. West European Politics, 34(5), 897–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Krupavicius, A. (2012). Lithuania. European Journal of Political Research Political Data Yearbook, 51(1), 187–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. LT4. (2014). Interview in Vilnius with Lithuanian Official on 7 May 2014.Google Scholar
  27. Maniokas, K. (2009). Conditionality and Compliance in Lithuania: The Case of the Best Performer. European Integration Online Papers, 13, Article 20. http://eiop.or.at/eiop/pdf/2009-020.pdf. Accessed 5 Jan 2016.
  28. Meyer-Sahling, J.-H. (2009). Varieties of Legacies: A Critical Review of Legacy Explanations of Public Administration Reform in East Central Europe. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 75(3), 509–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Milio, S. (2007). Can Administrative Capacity Explain Differences in Regional Performances? Evidence from Structural Funds Implementation in Southern Italy. Regional Studies, 41(4), 429–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Milio, S. (2008). How Political Stability Shapes Administrative Performance: The Italian Case. West European Politics, 31(5), 915–936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ragin, C. C. (2000). Fuzzy-Set Social Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  32. RO. (2015). Government of Romania: General Transport Master Plan, Approved by the Government. Available at http://gov.ro/en/government/cabinet-meeting/general-transport-master-plan-approved-by-the-government. Accessed 18 Feb 2016.
  33. Schraff, D. (2014). Buying Turnout or Rewarding Loyalists? Electoral Mobilization and EU Structural Funding in the German Länder. European Union Politics, 15(2), 277–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sedelmeier, U. (2008). After Conditionality: Post-accession Compliance with EU Law in East Central Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 15(6), 806–825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sedelmeier, U. (2012). Is Europeanisation Through Conditionality Sustainable? Lock-in of Institutional Change after EU Accession. West European Politics, 35(1), 20–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Segert, D. (2007). Postsozialismus–Spätsozialismus–Staatssozialismus. Grundlinien und Grundbegriffe einer politikwissenschaftlichen Postsozialismusforschung. In D. Segert (Ed.), Postsozialismus: Hinterlassenschaften des Staatssozialismus und neue Kapitalismen in Europa (pp. 1–23). Wien: Braumüller.Google Scholar
  37. Shefter, M. (1994). Political Parties and the State: The American Historical Experience. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Stykow, P. (2006). Staat und Wirtschaft in Russland: Interessenvermittlung zwischen Korruption und Konzertierung. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.Google Scholar
  39. Surubaru, N.-C. (2017). Revisiting the Role of Domestic Politics: Politicisation and European Cohesion Policy Performance in Central and Eastern Europe. East European Politics, 33(1), 106–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tosun, J. (2014). Absorption of Regional Funds: A Comparative Analysis. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 52(2), 371–387.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christian Hagemann
    • 1
  1. 1.Technical University MunichMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations