Advertisement

Stepping Back: Analysis and Discussion of ICT and Language Change

  • Richard S. Pinner
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter takes a more holistic view of some of the issues that have surfaced throughout this book. In particular, it discusses the impact of visuals on conversation, particularly looking at how they affect the brain and memory. It then discusses the issue of exomemory in relation to working memory, and then discusses the need for critical thinking skills during augmented communication, due to the way mass media is often structured and disseminated. It discusses whether smartphones are really making us ‘dumb’, and finally addresses the wider existential concerns about how smartphones prevent people from being ‘in the moment’ or ‘being there’.

Keywords

Digital communication Face-to-face interactions Technology Language Applied linguistics Sociolinguistics 

References

  1. Apperson, Jennifer M., Eric L. Laws, and James A. Scepansky. 2006. “The Impact of Presentation Graphics on Students’ Experience in the Classroom.” Computers & Education 47 (1): 116–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2004.09.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Associated Press. 2012. “Is Texting Ruining the Art of Conversation? Fear We Are Losing Ability to Have Traditional Face-to-Face Conversations.” Daily News. Accessed October 26. http://www.nydailynews.com/life-style/texting-ruining-art-conversation-fear-losing-ability-traditional-face-to-face-conversations-article-1.1089679.
  3. Baddeley, Alan D., and Graham Hitch. 1974. “Working Memory.” In Psychology of Learning and Motivation, edited by H. Bower Gordon, 47–89. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  4. Baron, Naomi S. 1998. “Letters by Phone or Speech by Other Means: The Linguistics of Email.” Language & Communication 18 (2): 133–70.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(98)00005-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baron, Naomi S. 2008. Always On: Language in an Online and Mobile World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baron, Naomi S. 2010. “Assessing the Internet’s Impact on Language.” In The Handbook of Internet Studies, edited by Robert Burnett, Mia Consalvo, and Charles Ess, 117–36. Sussex: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  7. Bird, S. Elizabeth. 2011. “Are We All Produsers Now?: Convergence and Media Audience Practices.” Cultural Studies 25 (4–5): 502–16.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2011.600532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blaze Press. 2015. “27 Powerful Images That Sum Up How Smartphones Are Ruining Our Lives: The Death of Conversation.” Blaze Press. Accessed October 29. https://blazepress.com/2015/05/27-powerful-images-that-sum-up-how-smartphones-are-ruining-our-lives/.
  9. Boudette, Neal. 2016. “Biggest Spike in Traffic Deaths in 50 Years? Blame Apps.” The New York Times, November 15, Business Day. Accessed February 15, 2017. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/16/business/tech-distractions-blamed-for-rise-in-traffic-fatalities.html?_r=0.
  10. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Translated by Richard Nice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Reprint, 2002.Google Scholar
  11. Bourgeois, Michelle S. 1990. “Enhancing Conversation Skills in Patients with Alzheimer’s Disease Using a Prosthetic Memory Aid.” Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 23 (1): 29–42.  https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1990.23-29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bourgeois, Michelle S. 1993. “Effects of Memory Aids on the Dyadic Conversations of Individuals with Dementia.” Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 26 (1): 77–87.  https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1993.26-77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. boyd, danah. 2014. It’s Complicated: The Social Lives of Networked Teens. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Calvin, William H. 1997. How Brains Think: Evolving Intelligence, Then and Now. London: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  15. Carr, Nicholas. 2010. The Shallows: What the Internet Is Doing to Our Brains. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  16. Cavus, Nadire, and Dogan Ibrahim. 2009. “m-Learning: An Experiment in Using SMS to Support Learning New English Language Words.” British Journal of Educational Technology 40 (1): 78–91.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00801.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Clark, Andy. 2003. Natural-Born Cyborgs: Minds, Technologies, and the Future of Human Intelligence. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Common Sense Media. 2016. Technology Addiction: Concern, Controversy, and Finding Balance. San Francisco, CA: Common Sense Media.Google Scholar
  19. Drago, Emily. 2015. “The Effect of Technology on Face-to-Face Communication.” The Elon Journal of Undergraduate Research in Communications 6 (1): 13–19.Google Scholar
  20. Dunn, Robert Andrew. 2015. “Polyreality.” In Beyond New Media: Discourse and Critique in a Polymediated Age, edited by Art Herbig, Andrew F. Herrmann, and Adam W. Tyma, 109–24. London: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  21. Ewing, Mike. 2012. “71% More Likely to Purchase Based on Social Media Referrals.” HubSpot. Accessed February 21, 2017. https://blog.hubspot.com/blog/tabid/6307/bid/30239/71-More-Likely-to-Purchase-Based-on-Social-Media-Referrals-Infographic.aspx#sm.000o9nydesp5dq3106j22caz48wih.
  22. Fairclough, Norman. 2001. Language and Power (Language in Social Life), 2nd ed. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
  23. Field, John. 2008. Social Capital (Key Ideas), 2nd ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Frank, Philipp. 1947. Einstein: His Life and Times. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
  25. Gambino, Lauren. 2016. “Hillary Clinton Warns Fake News Can Have ‘Real World Consequences’.” The Guardian, December 9. Accessed February 15, 2017. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/dec/08/hillary-clinton-fake-news-consequences-pizzagate.
  26. Glenberg, Arthur M., and William E. Langston. 1992. “Comprehension of Illustrated Text: Pictures Help to Build Mental Models.” Journal of Memory and Language 31 (2): 129–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(92)90008-L.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Goggin, Gerard, and Larissa Hjorth (eds.). 2014. The Routledge Companion to Mobile Media. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Greenslade, Roy 2015. “Newspaper Readers’ Election Votes Reveal Influence of Rightwing Press.” The Guardian, June 8. https://www.theguardian.com/media/greenslade/2015/jun/08/newspaper-reader-election-ukip-express-sun-mail-telegraph.
  29. Harris, Sandra. 2007. “Politeness and Power.” In The Routledge Companion to Sociolinguistics, edited by Carmen Llamas, Louise Mullany, and Peter Stockwell, 122–29. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Hatfield, Elaine, John T. Cacioppo, and Richard L. Rapson. 1993. “Emotional Contagion.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 2 (3): 96–100.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10770953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Herbig, Art, Andrew F. Herrmann, and Adam W. Tyma (eds.). 2015. Beyond New Media: Discourse and Critique in a Polymediated Age. London: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  32. Hill, Andrea, Tammi Arford, Amy Lubitow, and Leandra M. Smollin. 2012. “I’m Ambivalent About It.” Teaching Sociology 40 (3): 242–56.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055x12444071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hostetter, Autumn B. 2011. “When Do Gestures Communicate? A Meta-Analysis.” Psychological Bulletin 137 (2): 297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hunt, Laurence T., Robb B. Rutledge, W.M. Nishantha Malalasekera, Steven W. Kennerley, and Raymond J. Dolan. 2016. “Approach-Induced Biases in Human Information Sampling.” PLoS Biology 14 (11): e2000638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Isaacson, Walter. 2007. Einstein: His Life and Universe. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  36. Jenkins, Henry, Sam Ford, and Joshua Green. 2013. Spreadable Media: Creating Value and Meaning in a Networked Culture. New York, NY: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Jones, Rodney H. 2005. “Sites of Engagement as Sites of Attention: Time, Space and Culture in Electronic Discourse.” In Discourse in Action: Introducing Mediated Discourse Analysis, edited by Sigrid Norris and Rodney H. Jones, 141–54. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Jones, Rodney H. 2010. “Cyberspace and Physical Space: Attention Structures in Computer Mediated Communication.” In Semiotic Landscapes: Text, Space and Globalization, edited by A. Jaworski and C. Thurlow, 151–67. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  39. King, Patricia M., and Karen Strohm Kitchener. 1994. Developing Reflective Judgment: Understanding and Promoting Intellectual Growth and Critical Thinking in Adolescents and Adults, Higher and Adult Education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  40. Kozinets, Robert V. 2015. Netnography: Redefined, 2nd ed. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  41. Krauss Whitbourne, Susan 2011. “Your Smartphone May Be Making You… Not Smart: Is the Latest iPhone Hazardous to Your Brain?” Psychology Today, October 18.Google Scholar
  42. Lari, Fateme Samiei. 2014. “The Impact of Using PowerPoint Presentations on Students’ Learning and Motivation in Secondary Schools.” Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences 98: 1672–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Levendusky, Matthew. 2013. How Partisan Media Polarize America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lynch, Aaron. 1996. Thought Contagion: How Belief Spreads Through Society. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  45. Maguire, Eleanor A., Hugo J. Spiers, Catriona D. Good, Tom Hartley, Richard S. J. Frackowiak, and Neil Burgess. 2003. “Navigation Expertise and the Human Hippocampus: A Structural Brain Imaging Analysis.” Hippocampus 13 (2): 250–59.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hipo.10087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mastroberardino, Serena, Valerio Santangelo, Fabiano Botta, Francesco S. Marucci, and Marta Olivetti Belardinelli. 2008. “How the Bimodal Format of Presentation Affects Working Memory: An Overview.” Cognitive Processing 9 (1): 69–76.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-007-0195-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mayer, Richard E. 2002. “Multimedia Learning.” In Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 85–139. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  48. Mayer, Richard E., and Valerie K. Sims. 1994. “For Whom Is a Picture Worth a Thousand Words? Extensions of a Dual-Coding Theory of Multimedia Learning.” Journal of Educational Psychology 86 (3): 389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. McGurk, Harry, and John MacDonald. 1976. “Hearing Lips and Seeing Voices.” Nature 264: 746–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Michel, Jean-Baptiste, Yuan Kui Shen, Aviva Presser Aiden, Adrian Veres, Matthew K. Gray, Joseph P. Pickett, Dale Hoiberg, Dan Clancy, Peter Norvig, Jon Orwant, Steven Pinker, Martin A. Nowak, and Erez Lieberman Aiden. 2011. “Quantitative Analysis of Culture Using Millions of Digitized Books.” Science 331 (6014): 176–82.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1199644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Oswald, Margit E., and Stefan Grosjean. 2004. “Confirmation Bias.” In Cognitive Illusions: A Handbook on Fallacies and Biases in Thinking, Judgement and Memory, edited by Rüdiger F. Pohl, 79–96. New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  52. OxfordDictionaries.com. 2013. “OxfordDictionaries.com August 2013 New Words Update.” Accessed October 26, 2017. https://blog.oxforddictionaries.com/august-2013-update/.
  53. Postman, Neil. 2011. Technopoly: The Surrender of Culture to Technology. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
  54. Przybylski, Andrew K., and Netta Weinstein. 2013. “Can You Connect with Me Now? How the Presence of Mobile Communication Technology Influences Face-to-Face Conversation Quality.” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 30 (3): 237–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rosenblum, Lawrence D. 2008. “Speech Perception as a Multimodal Phenomenon.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 17 (6): 405–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Schreiber, Mark. 2018. “There’s No Easy Way to Escape from Your Smartphone.” The Japan Times, Last modified 4th August 2018. Accessed August 23. https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2018/08/04/national/media-national/theres-no-easy-way-escape-smartphone/#.W35DgOgza70.
  57. Seargeant, Philip, and Caroline Tagg (eds.). 2014. The Language of Social Media: Identity and Community on the Internet. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  58. Seargeant, Philip, and Caroline Tagg. 2018. “Fake News and Digital Literacy.” Palgrave. Accessed August 23. https://www.palgrave.com/gb/social-science-matters/seargeant-and-tagg-on-fake-news-and-digital-literacy.
  59. Smith, Rachel E. 2011. “Urban Dictionary: Youth Slanguage and the Redefining of Definition: What’s Up with Meep and Other Words in the Urban Dictionary.” English Today 27 (4): 43–48.  https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266078411000526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Svoboda, Eva, and Brian Richards. 2009. “Compensating for Anterograde Amnesia: A New Training Method That Capitalizes on Emerging Smartphone Technologies.” Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 15 (4): 629–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tagg, Caroline. 2015. Exploring Digital Communication: Language in Action. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Thompson, Clive. 2013. Smarter Than You Think: How Technology Is Changing Our Minds for the Better. New York, NY: Penguin.Google Scholar
  63. Turkle, Sherry. 2005. The Second Self: Computers and the Human Spirit, 20th Anniversary ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Turkle, Sherry. 2012. Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. Philadelphia, PA: Basic books.Google Scholar
  65. Turkle, Sherry. 2015a. Reclaiming Conversation: The Power of Talk in a Digital Age. New York: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  66. Turkle, Sherry. 2015b. “Stop Googling: Let’s Talk.” The New York Times, SR1. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/27/opinion/sunday/stop-googling-lets-talk.html.
  67. Twenge, Jean M. 2017. “Have Smartphones Destroyed a Generation?” The Atlantic.Google Scholar
  68. Ushioda, Ema. 2011. “Language Learning Motivation, Self and Identity: Current Theoretical Perspectives.” Computer Assisted Language Learning 24 (3): 199–210.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2010.538701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. van Dijk, Jan A.G.M., and Alexander J.A.M. van Deursen. 2014. Digital Skills: Unlocking the Information Society. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  70. Vincent, Jane, and Leopoldina Fortunati. 2014. “The Emotional Identity of the Mobile Phone.” In The Routledge Companion to Mobile Media, edited by Gerard Goggin and Larissa Hjorth, 312–19. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  71. Wade, Kimberley A., Maryanne Garry, Don J. Read, and D. Stephen Lindsay. 2002. “A Picture Is Worth a Thousand Lies: Using False Photographs to Create False Childhood Memories.” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 9 (3): 597–603.  https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03196318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Wagner, Petra, Zofia Malisz, and Stefan Kopp. 2014. “Gesture and Speech in Interaction: An Overview.” Speech Communication 57: 209–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Zeitlyn, David. 2009. Digital Anthropology Report. Kent: University of Kent.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of English LiteratureSophia UniversityTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations