Advertisement

Augmented Communication as a Modern Phenomenon in Ordinary Speech

  • Richard S. PinnerEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Augmented communication is presented as it relates to people with normal speech who utilise digital devices naturally as part of their face-to-face conversations. Special attention is placed on context, identity and community by highlighting narrative samples from the data in the form of vignettes, each of which is designed to introduce one of the four types of augmented communication.

Keywords

Digital communication Face-to-face interactions Technology Language Applied linguistics Sociolinguistics 

References

  1. Agger, Ben. 2012. Oversharing: Presentations of Self in the Internet Age, Framing 21st Century Social Issues. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baron, Naomi S. 2008. Always on: Language in an Online and Mobile World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baym, Nancy K. 2015. Personal Connections in the Digital Age, Digital Media and Society. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bird, S. Elizabeth. 2011. “Are We All Producers Now? Convergence and Media Audience Practices.” Cultural Studies 25 (4–5): 502–16.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2011.600532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. boyd, danah. 2014. It’s Complicated: The Social Lives of Networked Teens. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Burnett, Dean. 2013. “The Only Susan Greenfield Article You’ll Ever Need.” The Guardian. Accessed October 25. https://www.theguardian.com/science/brain-flapping/2013/apr/09/susan-greenfield-article-how-to-guide.
  7. Carr, Nicholas. 2008. “Is Google Making Us Stupid? What the Internet Is Doing to Our Brains.” The Atlantic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carr, Nicholas. 2010. The Shallows: What the Internet Is Doing to Our Brains. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  9. Castells, Manuel. 1996. The Rise of the Network Society, vol. 1, The Information Age: Economy, Society, and Culture. Padstow: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  10. Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly. 1997. Finding Flow: The Psychology of Engagement with Everyday Life. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  11. Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly. 2013. Flow: The Psychology of Happiness. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  12. Deumert, Ana. 2014. “The Performance of a Ludic Self on Social Network (ing) Sites.” In The Language of Social Media: Identity and Community on the Internet, edited by Philip Seargeant and Caroline Tagg, 23–45. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eppler, Martin J., and Jeanne Mengis. 2004. “The Concept of Information Overload: A Review of Literature from Organization Science, Accounting, Marketing, MIS, and Related Disciplines.” The Information Society 20 (5): 325–44.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240490507974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Furedi, Frank. 2015. “Age of Distraction: Why the Idea Digital Devices Are Destroying Our Concentration and Memory Is a Myth.” The Independent, October 11. http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/features/age-of-distraction-why-the-idea-digital-devices-are-destroying-our-concentration-and-memory-is-a-a6689776.html.
  15. Granic, Isabela, Adam Lobel, and Rutger CME Engels. 2014. “The Benefits of Playing Video Games.” American Psychologist 69 (1): 66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Greenfield, Susan. 2015. Mind Change: How Digital Technologies Are Leaving Their Mark on Our Brains. London: Random House.Google Scholar
  17. Hanna, Richard, Andrew Rohm, and Victoria L. Crittenden. 2011. “We’re All Connected: The Power of the Social Media Ecosystem.” Business Horizons 54 (3): 265–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Herbig, Art, Andrew F. Herrmann, and Adam W. Tyma (eds.). 2015. Beyond New Media: Discourse and Critique in a Polymediated Age. London: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  19. Jenkins, Henry, Sam Ford, and Joshua Green. 2013. Spreadable Media: Creating Value and Meaning in a Networked Culture. New York, NY: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Jenkins, Henry, Ravi Purushotma, Margaret Weigel, Katie Clinton, and Alice J. Robison. 2009. Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21st Century. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kant, Tanya. 2015. “FCJ-180 ‘Spotify Has Added an Event to Your Past’: (Re)Writing the Self Through Facebook’s Autoposting Apps.” The Fibreculture Journal 25 (Apps and Affect). http://dx.doi.org/10.15307/fcj.25.180.2015.
  22. Lazzaro, Nicole. 2009. “Why We Play: Affect and the Fun of Games.” In Human-Computer Interaction: Designing for Diverse Users and Domains, edited by Andrew Sears and Julie A. Jacko, 155–76. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press (Taylor Francis Group).Google Scholar
  23. Lynch, Aaron. 1996. Thought Contagion: How Belief Spreads Through Society. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  24. Marwick, Alice E., and danah boyd. 2011. “I Tweet Honestly, I Tweet Passionately: Twitter Users, Context Collapse, and the Imagined Audience.” New Media & Society 13 (1): 114–33.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810365313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Page, Ruth. 2014. “Hoaxes, Hacking and Humour: Analysing Impersonated Identity on Social Network Sites.” In The Language of Social Media: Identity and Community on the Internet, edited by Philip Seargeant and Caroline Tagg, 46–64. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pink, Sarah, and Larissa Hjorth. 2014. “The Digital Wayfarer: Reconceptualizing Camera Phone Practices in an Age of Locative Media.” In The Routledge Companion to Mobile Media, edited by Gerard Goggin and Larissa Hjorth, 488–98. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Pinner, Richard Stephen. 2016a. “Constructing and Managing Transportable Identities on Social Networking Sites.” Explorations in Teacher Education 23 (2): 2–5.Google Scholar
  28. Pinner, Richard Stephen. 2016b. Reconceptualising Authenticity for English as a Global Language, edited by David Singleton, SLA. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  29. Porterfield, Andrew. 2016. “Another Modern Myth: Shrinking Attention Spans.” Genetic Literacy Project. Accessed October 14. https://geneticliteracyproject.org/2016/07/25/another-modern-myth-shrinking-attention-spans/.
  30. Rose, Ellen. 2010. “Continuous Partial Attention: Reconsidering the Role of Online Learning in the Age of Interruption.” Educational Technology 50 (4): 41–46.Google Scholar
  31. Seargeant, Philip, and Caroline Tagg. 2014a. “Introduction: The Language of Social Media.” In The Language of Social Media: Identity and Community on the Internet, edited by Philip Seargeant and Caroline Tagg, 1–20. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Seargeant, Philip, and Caroline Tagg (eds.). 2014b. The Language of Social Media: Identity and Community on the Internet. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  33. Shirky, Clay. 2008. Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing Without Organizations. New York, NY: Penguin.Google Scholar
  34. Shirky, Clay. 2011. “The Political Power of Social Media: Technology, the Public Sphere, and Political Change.” Foreign affairs 90: 28–41. Google Scholar
  35. Smith, David. 2017. “Teaching in the Age of Social Media.” [Website]. University Affairs, Last Modified April 5, 2017. Accessed October 13. http://www.universityaffairs.ca/career-advice/career-advice-article/teaching-age-social-media/.
  36. Sproull, Lee, and Sara Kiesler. 1991. Connections: New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.Google Scholar
  37. Tagg, Caroline. 2015. Exploring Digital Communication: Language in Action. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Thompson, Clive. 2013. Smarter Than You Think: How Technology Is Changing Our Minds for the Better. New York, NY: Penguin.Google Scholar
  39. Turkle, Sherry. 2012. Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. Philadelphia, PA: Basic books.Google Scholar
  40. Turkle, Sherry. 2015a. Reclaiming Conversation: The Power of Talk in a Digital Age. New York: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  41. Turkle, Sherry. 2015b. “Stop Googling. Let’s Talk.” The New York Times, SR1. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/27/opinion/sunday/stop-googling-lets-talk.html.
  42. van Dijck, José. 2011. “Flickr and the Culture of Connectivity: Sharing Views, Experiences, Memories.” Memory Studies 4 (4): 401–15.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1750698010385215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. van Dijck, José. 2012. “Facebook and the Engineering of Connectivity.” Convergence 19 (2): 141–55.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856512457548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. van Dijck, José. 2013. The Culture of Connectivity: A Critical History of Social Media. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Van Dijk, Jan. 2012. The Network Society, 3rd ed. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  46. Vincent, Jane, and Leopoldina Fortunati. 2014. “The Emotional Identity of the Mobile Phone.” In The Routledge Companion to Mobile Media, edited by Gerard Goggin and Larissa Hjorth, 312–19. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  47. Wu, Bo, and Haiying Shen. 2015. “Analyzing and Predicting News Popularity on Twitter.” International Journal of Information Management 35 (6): 702–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of English LiteratureSophia UniversityTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations