Advertisement

Dilemmas in Performance-Based Budgeting

  • Michiel S. de VriesEmail author
  • Juraj Nemec
Chapter
Part of the Governance and Public Management book series (GPM)

Abstract

The central theme of this book concerns the many dilemmas and paradoxes of performance-based budgeting. The modern concept of performance-based budgeting is by now at least 70 years old and this poses the question, whether the limited results achieved might provide an indication that it has reached a phase in its life-cycle that it has become time for its retirement. This book argues the opposite. This book contains case studies from many countries in the world—including most developed countries, but with a focus on countries in transitional, developmental conditions, where implementation failures often limit the success of realized reforms, and where the dilemmas surrounding performance-based budgeting might be extremely prominent. In-depth evaluation of real cases serves as an important learning tool both for the academic and professional field. Implementation mistakes can perhaps not be prevented, but as international experiences show, can be resolved—the book may help in this way.

Keywords

Dilemmas and paradoxes of performance-based budgeting Case studies from many countries Learning tool Implementation mistakes 

References

  1. Andrews, Rhys, George A. Boyne, and Richard M. Walker. 2006. Subjective and Objective Measures of Organizational Performance: An Empirical Exploration. In Public Service Performance: Perspectives on Measurement and Management, ed. George A. Boyne, Meier Kenneth, Laurence J. O’Toole, Jr., and Richard M. Walker, 14–34. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511488511.002.
  2. Behn, Robert D. 1994. The Wrong Way to Motivate. Governing 8: 70.Google Scholar
  3. Borst, Rick, Christiaan Lako, and Michiel S. de Vries. 2014. Is Performance Measurement Applicable in the Public Sector? A Comparative Study of Attitudes Among Dutch Officials. International Journal of Public Administration 37 (13): 922–931.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2014.944988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Breul, Jonathan. 2007. GPRA—A Foundation for Performance Budgeting. Public Performance & Management Review 30 (3): 312–331.  https://doi.org/10.2753/pmr1530-9576300301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brusca, Isabel, Eugenio Caperchione, Sandra Cohen, and Francesca Manes-Rossi. 2018. IPSAS, EPSAS and Other Challenges in European Public Sector Accounting and Auditing. In The Palgrave Handbook of Public Administration and Management in Europe, ed. Edoardo Ongaro and Sandra van Thiel, 165–185. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.  https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55269-3_8.Google Scholar
  6. Cullis, John, and Philip Jones. 2009. Public Finance and Public Choice: Analytical Perspectives, 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. de Kruijf, Johan A. M., and Michiel S. de Vries. 2018. Contextualizing the Trend from Output to Outcome Measurement: The Dutch Pension System. Public Money & Management 38 (1): 65–72.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2017.1389544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Denhardt, Janet V., and Robert B. Denhardt. 2007. The New Public Service: Serving, Not Steering, Expanded ed. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  9. Easton, David. 1957. An Approach to the Analysis of Political Systems. World Politics 9 (3): 383–400.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2008920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eldridge, Cynthia, and Natasha Palmer. 2009. Performance-Based Payment: Some Reflections on the Discourse, Evidence and Unanswered Questions. Health Policy and Planning 24 (3): 160–166.  https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czp002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Finer, Samuel E. 1997. The History of Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Friedman, Milton. 1975. Interview with Richard Heffner on The Open Mind (7 December 1975).Google Scholar
  13. Gilmour, John B., and David E. Lewis. 2006. Does Performance Budgeting Work? An Examination of the Office of Management and Budget’s PART Scores. Public Administration Review 66 (5): 742–752.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00639.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hirschman, Albert O. 1991. The Rhetoric of Reaction: Perversity, Futility, Jeopardy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Jordan, Meagan M., and Merl M. Hackbart. 1999. Performance Budgeting and Performance Funding in the States: A States Assessment. Public Budgeting Finance 19 (1): 68–88.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0275-1100.1999.01157.x.
  16. Ladd, Helen F. 2002. School Vouchers: A Critical View. Journal of Economic Perspectives 16 (4): 3–24.  https://doi.org/10.1257/089533002320950957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Merton, Robert K. 1936. The Unanticipated Consequences of Purposive Social Action. American Sociological Review 1 (6): 894–904. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2084615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Moynihan, Donald P. 2008. The Dynamics of Performance Management: Constructing Information and Reform. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Moynihan, Donald P., and Ivor Beazley. 2016. Toward Next-Generation Performance Budgeting: Lessons from the Experiences of Seven Reforming Countries. The World Bank.  https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0954-5.
  20. Nemec, Juraj, and Michiel S. de Vries. 2012. Public Sector Dynamics in Central and Eastern Europe. Bratislava: NISPAcee.Google Scholar
  21. OECD. 2005. Modernising Government: The Way Forward. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  22. OECD. 2007. Performance Budgeting in OECD Countries. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  23. OECD. 2008. Performance Budgeting: A User’s Guide. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  24. OECD. 2014. Budgeting Practices and Procedures in OECD Countries. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  25. Olson, Mancur. 1965 [2009]. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Pavlik, Marek, and Michiel S. de Vries. 2014. The Voucher System as an Alternative for Allocating Sports Grants. Central European Journal of Public Policy 8 (2): 4–27.Google Scholar
  27. Robinson, Marc. 2002. Financial Control in Australian Government Budgeting. Public Budgeting & Finance 22 (1): 80–93.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5850.00067.
  28. Robinson, Marc, ed. 2007. Performance Budgeting: Linking Funding and Results. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.  https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137001528.Google Scholar
  29. Robinson, Marc, and Jim Brumby. 2005. Does Performance Budgeting Work? An Analytical Review of the Empirical Literature. IMF Working Papers 5 (210), International Monetary Fund (IMF), Washington.  https://doi.org/10.5089/9781451862294.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Saliterer, Iris, Mariafrancesca Sicilia, and Ileana Steccolini. 2018. Public Budgets and Budgeting in Europe: State of the Art and Future Challenges. In The Palgrave Handbook of Public Administration and Management in Europe, ed. Ongaro Edoardo and Sandra van Thiel, 141–163. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.  https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55269-3_7.Google Scholar
  31. Schick, Allen. 2003. The Performing State. OECD Journal on Budgeting 3 (2): 71–103.  https://doi.org/10.1787/budget-v3-art10-en.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schick, Allen. 2008. Getting Performance Budgeting to Perform. Washington: World Bank.Google Scholar
  33. Schick, Allen. 2014. The Metamorphoses of Performance Budgeting. OECD Journal on Budgeting 13 (2): 49–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Scott, Graham. 2010. Performance-Informed Budgeting: Experiences and Opportunities. In Results, Performance Budgeting and Trust in Government, ed. Arizti Pedro, Jim Brumby, Nick Manning, Roby Senderowitsch, and Theo Thomas, 31–40. Washington, DC: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank.Google Scholar
  35. Serban, Andreea M., and Joseph C. Burke. 1998. Meeting the Performance Funding Challenge: A Nine-State Comparative Analysis. Public Productivity & Management Review 22 (2): 157–176.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3381031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Smith, Peter. 1995. On the Unintended Consequences of Publishing Performance Data in the Public Sector. International Journal of Public Administration 18 (2–3): 277–310.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01900699508525011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tarschys, Daniel. 2002. Time Horizons in Budgeting. OECD Journal on Budgeting 2 (2): 77–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Van Dooren, Wouter, and Cornelia Hoffmann. 2018. Performance Management in Europe: An Idea Whose Time Has Come and Gone. In The Palgrave Handbook of Public Administration and Management in Europe, ed. Edoardo Ongaro and Sandra van Thiel, 207–226. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  39. Van Dooren, Wouter, Geert Bouckaert, and John Halligan. 2010. Performance Management in the Public Sector. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
  40. Van Thiel, Sandra, and Frans L. Leeuw. 2002. The Performance Paradox in the Public Sector. Public Performance & Management Review 25 (3): 267–281.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2002.11643661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wildavsky, Aaron B. 1964 [2015]. The Politics of the Budgetary Process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Willoughby, Katherine, and Paul Benson. 2011. Program Evaluation, Performance Budgeting and PART: The US Federal Government Experience. Atlanta: Andrew Young School of Policy Studies Working Paper.Google Scholar
  43. World Bank. 2010. Results, Performance Budgeting and Trust in Government. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Public Administration and Institute of Management ResearchRadboud University NijmegenNijmegenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of Public Economics, Faculty of Economics and AdministrationMasaryk UniversityBrnoCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations