Advertisement

Program Planning for a Mars Hardship Post: Social, Psychological, and Spiritual Services

  • Margaret Boone RappaportEmail author
  • Christopher Corbally
Chapter
Part of the Space and Society book series (SPSO)

Abstract

Human services planning for crews who go to Mars is in its earliest phase, but the modalities for service delivery are well worth anticipating because they could involve some of the first innovations that merge physical, biological, and digital capacities on the new planet. This chapter examines the constraints of the planet Mars, itself, on all humans. It anticipates how “exogenous stressors” (gravity, atmosphere, radiation, light, and dust) might affect the psychological, social, and cultural capacities and conflicts of the earliest crews. Several types of service modalities are explored: hibernation; medication management; traditional psychotherapy; long-distance modalities to approximate the “talking cure”; digitized, keyed psychology workbooks; robotics, or service delivery without verbal feedback; AI technologies, or service delivery with verbal feedback; problem-solving at the cultural level; digital bulletin boards to substitute for journaling; and a special section on the issue of privacy. The chapter rounds out with a section, on types of spiritual services that may be beneficial even for those who profess no faith. We focus on “sacred space,” and on death and burial ritual on Mars. Factors explored here reflect the backgrounds of the two authors: one, a cultural anthropologist and biologist, and the other, an astronomer who is also a Catholic priest.

References

  1. Acevedo, B. P., Aron, E. N., Aron, A., Sangster, M.-D., Collins, N., & Brown, L. L. (2014). The highly sensitive brain: An fMRI study of sensory processing sensitivity and response to others’ emotions. Brain and Behavior, 4, 580–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ackermann, M., & van den Bogert, A. J. (2012). Predictive simulation of gait at low gravity reveals skipping as the preferred locomotion strategy. Journal of Biomechanics, 45(7), 1293–1298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aron, E. N., Aron, A., & Jagiellowicz, J. (2012). Sensory processing sensitivity: A review in the light of the evolution of biological responsibility. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16, 262–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Banks, M. R., Willoughby, L. M., & Banks, W. A. (2008). Animal-assisted therapy and loneliness in nursing homes: Use of robotic versus living dogs. Journal of American Medical Directors Association, 9, 173–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Birks, M., Bodak, M., Barlas, J., Harwood, J., & Pether, M. (2016). Robotic seals as therapeutic tools in an aged care facility: A qualitative study. Journal of Aging Research, Article ID 8569602, 7 pages.Google Scholar
  6. Braddock, M. (2018). Concepts for deep space travel: From warp drives and hibernation to world ships and cryogenics. Current Trends Biomedical Engineering & Bioscience, 12(5), 555847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bradford, J., Schaffer, M., & Talk, D. (2014). Torpor inducing transfer habitat for human stasis to mars. Final report prepared for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), Grant Number NNX13AP82G. May 11.Google Scholar
  8. Calo, C. J., Hunt-Bull, N., Lewis, L., & Metzler, T. (2011). Ethical implications of using the Paro robot with a focus on dementia patient care. In Proceedings of the AAAI Workshop on Human-Robot Interaction in Elder Care, WS-2011-2012, San Francisco, California, USA (pp. 20–24).Google Scholar
  9. Camara, C., Peris-Lopez, P., & Tapiador, J. E. (2015). Security and privacy issues in implantable medical devices: A comprehensive survey. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 55, 272–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cochran, G., & Harpending, H. (2010). The 10,000 year explosion: How civilization accelerated human evolution. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  11. Cockell, C. (2002). Mars is an awful place to live. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 27(1), 32–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cockell, C. S. (Ed.). (2016). Dissent, revolution and liberty beyond earth. New York: Springer Publishing.Google Scholar
  13. Dindia, K., & Allen, M. (1992). Sex differences in self-disclosure: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 106–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dutton, D. (2009). The art instinct: Beauty, pleasure, and human evolution. New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  15. Forsyth, D. R. (2015). Group psychotherapy, clinical psychology. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (2nd ed., Vol. 10, pp. 428–433). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  16. Gaudin, S. (2014). When astronauts breathe on mars, they’ll thank MIT professor; Researchers building device that will create oxygen on the red planet. Computerworld (Online. August 7, 2018).Google Scholar
  17. Halperin, D., Heydt-Benjamin, T. S., Kevin, F., Kohno, T., & Maisel, W. H. (2008). Security and privacy for implantable medical devices. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 7, 30–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hawks, J., Wang, E. T., Cochran, G. M., Harpending, H. C., & Moyzis, R. K. (2007). Recent acceleration of human adaptive evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(52), 20753–20758.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Holland, P. (2018). ‘My Special Aflac Duck’ is a robot to help kids with cancer. Retrieved June 19, 2018, from https://www.cnet.com/news/my-special-aflac-duck-robot-helps-kids-through-cancer/.
  20. Hublin, J.-J., Ben-Ncer, A., Bailey, S. E., Freidline, S. E., Neubauer, S., Skinner, M. M., et al. (2017). New fossils from Jebel Irhoud, Morocco and the Pan-African origin of homo sapiens. Nature, 546, 289–292.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Impey, C. (2018). Personal communication.Google Scholar
  22. Kanas, N. (2014). The new martians. A scientific novel. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing (Digital edition).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kanas, N. (2015). Humans in space; The psychological hurdles. Chichester, U.K.: Springer Praxis Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kara, F. K., Darcy, A., & Vierhile, M. (2017). Delivering cognitive behavior therapy to young adults with symptoms of depression and anxiety using a fully automated conversational agent (Woebot): A randomized controlled trial. JMIR Mental Health, 4(2), e19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Katzenbach, J. R., Steffen, I., & Kronley, C. (2012). Cultural change that sticks. Harvard Business Review, Vol. 90, pp. 110–117.Google Scholar
  26. Kazdin, A. E., & Blasé, S. L. (2011). Rebooting psychotherapy research and practice to reduce the burden of mental illness. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 21–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kino, E. F. (1919). Kino’s historical memoir of Pimeria Alta. (H. E. Bolton, Trans.). Bedford, MA: Applewood Books. (Original: 1683–1711).Google Scholar
  28. Lucas, G. M., Gratch, J., King, A., & Morency, L.-P. (2014). It’s only a computer: Virtual humans increase willingness to disclose. Computers in Human Behavior, 37, 94–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Masi, C. M., Chen, H.-Y., Hawkley, L. C., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2011). A meta-analysis of interventions to reduce loneliness. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15(3), 219–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. NASA, National Aeronautics and Space Administration. (2011). Psychology of space exploration: Contemporary research in historical perspective. In: D. A. Vakoch (Ed.), The NASA History Series, NASA SP-2011-4411, Washington, D.C.: USGPO.Google Scholar
  31. NASA, National Aeronautics and Space Administration. (2018). NASA twins study confirms preliminary findings. Reported online by M. Edwards & L. Abadie, updated March 5, 2018 (by T. Gushanas (Ed.).Google Scholar
  32. Newman, A. (2016). Therapy cats for dementia patients, batteries included. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/15/nyregion/robotic-therapy-cats-dementia.html; Oviedo, L. (2019). Raising the right questions. In this volume.
  33. Pickard, M. D., Roster, C. A., & Chen, Y. (2016). Revealing sensitive information in personal interviews: Is self-disclosure easier with humans or avatars and under what conditions? Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 23–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pycroft, L., Boccard, S. G., Owen, Sarah L. F., Stein, J. F., Fitzgerald, J. J., Green, A. L., et al. (2016). Brainjacking: Implant security issues in invasive neuromodulation. World Neurosurgery, 92, 454–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rappaport, M. B. (2002). Hank chin; Scientist, seer, rebel, and founder of the first martian republic. Book II of The Nanotech Trilogy. Manuscript.Google Scholar
  36. Schaffer, M., Bradford, J., & Talk, D. (2016). A feasible, near-term approach to human stasis for long-duration deep space missions. In 67th International Astronautical Congress (IAC), Guadalajara, Mexico (pp. 1–17).Google Scholar
  37. Seto, K. C., Golden, J. S., Alberti, M., & Turner II, B. L. (2017). Sustainability in an urbanizing planet. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(34), 8935–8938.Google Scholar
  38. Snyder, M. (2013). Journaling. In R. Lindquist, M. Snyder, & M. F. Tracy (Eds.), Complementary & alternative therapies in nursing (7th ed., pp. 205–215). Chichester, U.K.: Springer.Google Scholar
  39. Solomon, S. (2016). Future humans; inside the science of our continuing evolution. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Szocik, K. (2016). Religion in a future mars colony? Spaceflight. November.Google Scholar
  41. Szocik, K., Marques, R. E., Abood, S., LysenkoRyba, A. K. K., & Minich, D. (2018). Biological and social challenges of human reproduction in a long-term mars base. Futures, 100, 56–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Szocik, K., Campa, R., Rappaport, M. B., & Corbally, C. (In press). The special case of modifications to counter bone loss for manned mars missions.Google Scholar
  43. Tamir, D. I., & Mitchell, J. P. (2012). Disclosing information about the self is intrinsically rewarding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 8038–8043.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Todd, R. M., Ehlers, M. R., Müller, D. J., Robertson, A., Palombo, D. J., Freeman, N., Levine, B., Anderson, A. K. (2015). Neurogenetic variations in norepinephrine availability enhance perceptual vividness. Journal of Neuroscience, 35, 6506–6516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ullrich, P., & Lutgendorf, S. K. (2002). Journaling about stressful events: Effects of cognitive processing and emotional expression. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 24, 244–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Varnum, Michael E. W., & Grossmann, I. (2017). Cultural change: The how and the why. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12, 956–972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Margaret Boone Rappaport
    • 1
    Email author
  • Christopher Corbally
    • 2
  1. 1.The Human Sentience Project LLCTucsonUSA
  2. 2.Vatican Observatory, U. ArizonaTucsonUSA

Personalised recommendations