Advertisement

Becoming Digital – Instruments for SME

  • Holger HeppnerEmail author
  • Katharina Schlicher
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 876)

Abstract

The developments of “Industrie 4.0” are a special challenge for small and medium sized enterprises (SME). Within the interdisciplinary, application-oriented joint project “INLUMIA” psychologists and engineers compile instruments, which can be used by SME to identify their individual current developmental state of digitization, choose fitting technologies and implement them in an employee oriented way. From a socio-technical standpoint different aspects of the dimensions “technology”, “business” and “personnel” are considered to construct a comprehensive overview. The overall technological developmental state and the use of technique in production and engineering, the business model and business strategy as well as work design, qualification measures and internal communications are analyzed. Using organizational and demographical features enterprises are classified, so the developmental state of digitization can be compared to those of similar enterprises. The joint project between 11 partners is financed by the European Regional Development Fund NRW (EFRE.NRW) with a runtime of 3 years.

Keywords

Digitization SME Socio-technical systems Industrie 4.0 

References

  1. 1.
    Hermann, M., Pentek, T., Otto, B.: Design principles for industrie 4.0 scenarios. In: 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), pp. 3928–3937, March 2016Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mlekus, L., Maier, G.W.: Digitalisierung der Arbeitswelt: Ergebnisse einer Unternehmensumfrage zum Stand der Transformation. In: Bodden, E., Dressler, F., Dumitrescu, R., Gausemeier, J., Meyer auf der Heide, F., Scheytt, C., Trächtler, A. (eds.) Wissenschaftsforum intelligente technische Systeme (WInTeSys) 2017, vol. 369, pp. 141–153. Verlagsschriftenreihe des Heinz Nixdorf Instituts, Heinz Nixdorf Institut, Paderborn (2017)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schlicher, K., Paruzel, A., Steinmann, B., Maier, G.W.: Change management für die Einführung digitaler Arbeitswelten. In: Maier, G.W., Engels, G., Steffen, E. (eds.) Handbuch Gestaltung digitaler und vernetzter Arbeitswelten, pp. 1–36. Springer, Berlin (2018)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hobscheidt, D., Westermann, T, Dumitrescu, R., Dülme, C., Gausemeier, J., Heppner, H., Maier, G.: Soziotechnische Leistungsbewertung von Unternehmen im Kontext Industrie 4.0. In: Wissenschaftsforum Intelligente Technische Systeme (WInTeSys) 2017, vol. 369, pp. 11–24, 11–12 May2017. Heinz Nixdorf Institut, Verlagsschriftenreihe des Heinz Nixdorf Instituts, Paderborn (2017)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gausemeier, J., Lewandowski, A., Siebe, A., Soetebeer, M.: OMEGA: object-oriented method strategic redesign of business processes. In: IiM 1998 - Chaning the Ways We Work, Göteborg (1998)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hobscheidt, D., Lipsmeier, A., Dumitrescu, R.: Demand-orientated and sociotechnical solution patterns for digital tranformation in SMEs. In: The ISPIM Innovation Conference - Innovation, The Name of The Game, Stockholm (2018)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mlekus, L., Schlicher, K., Maier, G.W.: Kompetenzverlust oder Qualifizierungsbedarf – Welche Anforderungen stellt die digitale Arbeitswelt an Beschäftigte aus Produktion und Logistik? In: Presented at the 10. Tagung der DGPs-Fachgruppe Arbeits-, Organisations - und Wirtschaftspsychologie, Dresden (2017)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Work and Organizational PsychologyBielefeld UniversityBielefeldGermany

Personalised recommendations