Advertisement

Workers’ Body Constitution as a Risk Factor During Manual Materials Handling

  • Ana Colim
  • Pedro Arezes
  • Paulo Flores
  • Ana Cristina Braga
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 876)

Abstract

According to international statistical data, overweight and obese workers represent a significant fraction on the current workforce. However, the workers’ body constitution, including the excess of body fat mass, is an individual risk factor frequently forgotten during ergonomic assessment of workplaces. Manual Materials Handling (MMH) can produce important overloads in the workers’ musculoskeletal systems. For these reasons, this study aims at analyzing the workers’ body constitution, including the excess of body fat mass, as a musculoskeletal risk factor during MMH. With this purpose, it was developed an exploratory study divided into different phases, considering the collection and analysis of qualitative (semi-structured interviews with occupational health practitioners) and quantitative (physiological/biomechanical parameters) data. Overall, the results obtained throughout this study point to the fact that the excessive workers’ body fat mass is a musculoskeletal risk factor during MMH, which should be considered during ergonomic interventions at workplaces.

Keywords

Obesity Occupational health Musculoskeletal overload Manual Materials Handling 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work has been supported by COMPETE: POCI-01-0145-FEDER-007043 and FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia within the Project Scope: UID/CEC/00319/2013. The authors want also to acknowledge the work of the subjects who volunteered to participate in this experimental study.

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    Morris, S.: The impact of obesity on employment. Labour Econ. 14, 413–433 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tsai, S., Ahmed, F., Wendt, J., Bhojani, F., Donnelly, R.: The impact of obesity on illness absence and productivity in an industrial population of petrochemical workers. AEP 18(1), 8–14 (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Park, W., Singh, D., Levy, M., Jung, E.: Obesity effect on perceived postural stress during static posture maintenance tasks. Ergonomics, 52(9), 1169–1182 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    NIOSH: Ergonomic Guidelines for Manual Material Handling. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2007-131, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, USA (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Clark, B., Manini, T., Ploutz-Snyder, L.: Derecruitment of the lumbar musculature with fatiguing trunk extension exercise. Spine 28(3), 282–287 (2003)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yeung, S., Genaidy, A.M., Huston, R., Karwowski, W.: An expert cognitive approach to evaluate physical effort and injury risk in manual lifting - a brief report of a pilot study. Hum. Fact. Ergon. Manuf. 12(2), 227–234 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Waters, T., Putz-Anderson, V., Garg, A., Fine, L.: Revised NIOSH Equation for the design and evaluation of manual lifting tasks. Ergonomics 36(7), 749–776 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mital, A., Nicholson, A., Ayoub, M.: A Guide to Manual Materials Handling, 2nd edn. Taylor & Francis, London (1997)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sangachin, M., Cavuoto, L.: Obesity-related changes in prolongued repetitive lifting performance. Appl. Ergon. 56, 19–26 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Saunders, M., Lewis, P., Thornhill, A.: Research Methods for Business Students. Financial Times Prentice-Hall (2007)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
  13. 13.
    De Luca, C.: The use of surface electromyography in biomechanics. J. Appl. Biomech. 13, 135–163 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Konrad, P.: The ABC of EMG. Noraxon INC, USA (2005)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    McKean, C., Potvin, J.: Effects of a simulated industrial bin on lifting and lowering posture and trunk extensor muscle activity. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 28, 1–15 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lidstone, J., Ells, L., Finn, P., Whittaker, V., Wilkinson, J., Summerbell, C.: Independent associations between weight status and disability in adults: results from the health survey for England. Publ. Health. 120, 412–417 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wearing, S., Hennig, E., Byrne, N., Steele, J., Hills, A.: The biomechanics of restricted movement in obese adults. Obes. Rev. 7, 13–24 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gilleard, W., Smith, T.: Effect of obesity on posture and hip joint moments during a standing task, and trunk forward flexion motion. Int. J. Obes. 31(2), 267–271 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lewek, M., Rudolph, K., Snyder-Mackler, L.: Quadriceps femoris muscle weakness and activation failure in patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis. J. Orthop. Res. 22, 110–115 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Marras, W., Lavender, S., Leurgans, S., Fathallah, F., Ferguson, S., Allread, W., Rajulu, S.: Biomechanical risk factors for occupationally related low back disorders. Ergonomics 38(2), 377–410 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hignet, S., McAtamney, L.: Rapid entire body assessment. Appl. Ergon. 31, 201–205 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Corbeil, P., Plamondon, A., Teasdale, N., Handrigan, G., Ten Have, J., Manzerolle, N.: Biomechanical and Ergonomic Impacts of Handling in Obese Workers. Institut de recherché Robert-Sauvé en santé et en sécurité du travail, Canadá (2014)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pryce, R., Kriellaars, D.: Body segment inertial parameters and low back load in individuals with central adiposity. J. Biomech. 47(12), 3080–3086 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ana Colim
    • 1
  • Pedro Arezes
    • 1
  • Paulo Flores
    • 1
  • Ana Cristina Braga
    • 1
  1. 1.University of MinhoGuimarãesPortugal

Personalised recommendations