Advertisement

Study of the School Furniture Adequacy to Students’ Anthropometric Dimensions

  • Agostinho FernandesEmail author
  • Paula Carneiro
  • Nelson Costa
  • Ana C. Braga
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 876)

Abstract

The discomfort due to poor sitting posture may be related to the lack of suitability of the furniture. This miss-match is often due to the lack of consideration for ergonomic aspects that ensure the combination of anthropometric dimensions of users with the measures of the furniture. These miss-match situations can also be seen in the student work environment, where students spend a lot of time sitting at a desk. The aim of this study was to evaluate if students, who attend a Portuguese public school of elementary education, 2nd and 3rd cycles, use furniture with measures fitting their anthropometric measurements. For this purpose, the anthropometric measurements of all the students, as well as measurements of all tables and chairs from this school were collected. Taking as reference the European standard 1729-1: 2015, it was verified that 73% of the students don’t find a chair/table compatible with their anthropometric dimensions.

Keywords

School furniture EN 1729-1:2015 Anthropometric measurements Students 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The achievement of this work was only possible thanks to the receptivity of Chief Executive Officer to this problem. It is also worth noting the participation of all students as well as the involvement of their parents. A final note of thanks to the teachers of the discipline of Physical Education, for the availability of the time of their classes and collaboration in the logistics of collecting the measures.

This work has been supported by COMPETE: POCI-01-0145-FEDER-007043 and FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia within the Project Scope: UID/CEC/00319/2013.

References

  1. 1.
    Ivory, D.M.: The Impact of Dynamic Furniture on Classroom Performance: A Pilot Study, May 2011Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Geldhof, E., De Clercq, D., De Bourdeaudhuij, I., Cardon, G.: Classroom postures of 8–12 year old children. Ergonomics 50(10), 1571–1581 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130701587251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Trevelyan, F., Legg, S.: Back pain in school children—where to from here? Appl. Ergon. 37, 45–54 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Castellucci, I., Arezes, P., Viviani, C.: Mismatch between classroom furniture and anthropometric measures in Chilean schools. Appl. Ergon. 41(4), 563–568 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2009.12.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gonçalves, M.A.: Análise das condições ergonómicas das salas de aula do primeiro ciclo do ensino básico. Doctoral Thesis, Universidade do Minho, Portugal (2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Macedo, A., Morais, A., Martins, H., Martins, J., Pais, S., Mayan, O.: Match between classroom dimensions and students’ anthropometry: re-equipment according to European educational furniture standard. Hum. Factors 57(1), 48–60 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1177/001872081453399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    EN 1729-1: Furniture - Chairs and tables for educational institutions Part 1: Functional dimensions. English Version (2015)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    EN ISO 7250: Basic human body measurements for technological design - Part 1: Body measurement definition and landmarks. International Organization for Standardization, Geneve, Switzerland (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bragança, S., Arezes, P., Carvalho, M., Ashdownd, S., Castelluccie, I., Leão, C.: A comparison of manual anthropometric measurements with Kinect-based scanned measurements in terms of precision and reliability. http://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-182684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fernandes, A., Carneiro, P., Costa, N., Braga, A.: Characterization of school furniture in a basic education school. In: Occupational Safety and Hygiene VI, pp. 601–605. Taylor & Francis Group, London (2018)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Castellucci, I., Catalán, M., Arezes, P., Molenbroek, J.: Evidence for the need to update the Chilean standard for school furniture dimension specifications. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 56 (2014). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2015.09.019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Carneiro, V., Gomes, A., Rangel, B.: Propos al for a universal measurement system for school chair s and desk s for children from 6 to 10 years old. Appl. Ergon. 58, 373–385 (2016)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Entidade de Serviços Partilhados da Administração Pública (eSPap), AQ- Mob/Mobiliário (2015). https://www.espap.pt/spcp/Paginas/spcp.aspx#maintab5. Accessed 27 Oct 2017

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Agostinho Fernandes
    • 1
    Email author
  • Paula Carneiro
    • 1
  • Nelson Costa
    • 1
  • Ana C. Braga
    • 1
  1. 1.ALGORITMI CentreUniversity of MinhoBragaPortugal

Personalised recommendations