Intra-actions that Matter: Building for Practice in a Liberal Arts Science Course

  • Catherine MilneEmail author
Part of the Cultural Studies of Science Education book series (CSSE, volume 18)


My previous exploration of material culture, outlined in Chap.  2, really activated my thinking about how I might apply my interest in instruments as material culture into a course of study that had the goal of reengaging undergraduate learners with science. In this chapter, I make a case for using phenomenology and feminist theory to build a curriculum that seeks to value the learning of the students in the course and describe the phenomena I produced in the process.


  1. Barad, K. (1998). Getting real: Technoscientific practices and the materialization of reality. Differences. A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 10(2), 87–128.Google Scholar
  2. Barad, K. (2000). Reconceiving scientific literacy as agential literacy. In R. Reed & S. Traweek (Eds.), Doing Science+ Culture (pp. 221–258). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beach, D. (1999). Alienation and fetish in science education. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 43, 157–172. Scholar
  5. Bruner, J. (1992). Science education and teachers: A Karplus lecture. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 1, 5–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chang, H. (2004). Inventing temperature. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Crombie, A. C. (1990). Science, optics, and music in medieval and early modern thought. London: Hambledon Press.Google Scholar
  8. Dahlin, B., Østergaard, E., & Hugo, A. (2009). An argument for reversing the bases of science education – A phenomenological alternative to cognitivism. NorDiNa, 5, 185–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Foster, E. S. (1927). Problemata. In W. D. Ross (Ed.), The works of Aristotle. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press Accessed at: Scholar
  10. Haraway, D. (1992). The promises of monsters. A regenerative politics for inappropriate/d others. In L. Grossberg, C. Nelson, & P. A. Treichler (Eds.), Cultural studies (pp. 295–337). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Herschel, W. (1800). Investigation of the powers of the prismatic colours to heat and illuminate objects; with remarks, that prove the different refrangibility of radiant heat. To which is added, an inquiry into the method of viewing the sun advantageously, with telescopes of large apertures and high magnifying powers. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 90, 255–283 Accessed at: Scholar
  12. Husserl, E. (1970). The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology: An introduction to phenomenological philosophy (D. Carr, Trans.). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Ihde, D. (2000). Epistemology engines: An antique optical device has powered several centuries of scientific thought. Nature, 406, 21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ihde, D. (2006). Models, models everywhere. In J. Lenhard, G. Küppers, & T. Shinn (Eds.), Simulation: Pragmatic construction of reality (pp. 79–86). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ihde, D. (2012). Experimental phenomenology, Second edition: Multistabilities. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  16. Ihde, D. (2015). Preface: Positioning postphenomenology. In R. Rosenberger & P.-P. Verbeek (Eds.), Postphenomenological investigations: Essays on human-technology relations (pp. vi–xvi). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  17. Mandel, S. (2007). Apples. In S. Turkle (Ed.), Evocative objects: Things we think with (pp. 260–269). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  18. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). The phenomenology of perception (C. Smith, Trans.). New York: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
  19. Miller-Rushing, A., Primack, R., & Bonney, R. (2012). The history of public participation in ecological research. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10, 285–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Milne, C. (2011). The invention of science: Why history of science matters for the classroom. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  21. Milne, C. (2014a). Self-assessment and assessment for/as learning. In J. McVarish & C. Milne (Eds.), Self-assessment and self-evaluation in teacher education: A guide for the perplexed (pp. 145–148). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  22. Milne, C. (2014b). The conundrum of self-evaluation as argument. In J. McVarish & C. Milne (Eds.), Self-assessment and self-evaluation in teacher education: A guide for the perplexed (pp. 61–78). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  23. Milne, C. (2015). Beyond the actual: Exploring constructs of reality, knowledge and culture in virtual environments. In C. Milne, K. Tobin, & D. DeGennero (Eds.), Sociocultural studies and implications for science education: The experiential and the virtual (pp. 315–325). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Østergaard, E., Dahlin, B., & Hugo, A. (2008). Doing phenomenology in science education: A research review. Studies in Science Education, 44, 93–121. Scholar
  25. Park, P. (2014). Realizing the potential of citizen science. In UNEP Year Book 2014: Emerging issues in our global environment. Nairobi, Kenya: United Nations Environment Programme.Google Scholar
  26. Rheinberger, H.-J. (1995). From microsomes to ribosomes: Strategies of representation. Journal of the History of Biology, 28, 48–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Roehl, T. (2012). From witnessing to recording – Material objects and the epistemic configuration of science classes. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 20, 49–70. Scholar
  28. Science for Citizens. (2016).. Scistarter. Accessed at:
  29. Squarzoni, P. (2014). Climate changed: A personal journey through the science. New York: Abrams ComicArts.Google Scholar
  30. The Cornell Lab of Ornithology. (2011). Celebrate urban birds. Accessed at:
  31. Turkle, S. (2007). Introduction: The things that matter. In S. Turkle (Ed.), Evocative objects: Things we think with (pp. 3–10). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  32. Wagenschein, M. (2008). Save the phenomena: The primacy of unmediated experience. The Nature Institute (Trans.). Downloaded at:
  33. Wilson, C. (1996). Instruments and ideologies: The social construction of knowledge and its critics. American Philosophical Quarterly, 33, 167–181.Google Scholar
  34. Zooniverse. (n.d.). Located at:

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.New York UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations