Advertisement

The Ethical and Sociopolitical Potential of New Materialisms for Science Education

  • Shakhnoza KayumovaEmail author
  • Jesse Bazzul
Chapter
Part of the Cultural Studies of Science Education book series (CSSE, volume 18)

Abstract

The following conversation outlines the ethical and political potential of new materialisms for science education. The authors explore how new materialisms provide new spaces for the creative ontologies that promote new forms of ethical thinking and action through/for science education. Beginning with a healthy skepticism of the political and ethical possibilities of new materialisms, the authors discuss important concepts relevant to science and science education research such as rhizome, assemblage, territorialization, intra-actions, entities, and multiplicities. In this metalogue, Shakhnoza Kayumova and Jesse Bazzul engage what they say are the most salient aspects of new materialisms. The authors lay out the theoretical grounds for educational communities to begin diagramming assemblages as a way to engage creative ontologies.

References

  1. Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Towards an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs, 28(3), 801–831.  https://doi.org/10.1086/345321 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the university halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matters and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.  https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822388128 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barad, K. (2012). Interview. In R. Dolphijn & I. Van der Tuin (Eds.), New materialism: Interviews and cartographies (pp. 48–70). Ann Arbor, MI: Open Humanities Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bazzul, J. (2015). Towards a politicized notion of citizenship for science education: Engaging the social through dissensus. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 15(3), 221–233.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2015.1051670 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bazzul, J., & Tolbert, S. (2017). Reassembling the natural and social commons. In Educational commons in theory and practice (pp. 55–73). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  6. Bazzul, J., & Kayumova, S. (2015). Toward a social ontology for science education: Introducing Deleuze and Guattari’s assemblages. Educational Philosophy and Theory., (ahead-of-print, 1–16.Google Scholar
  7. Bennett, J. (2009). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.  https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822391623 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Braidotti, R. (2012). Interview. In R. Dolphijn & I. Van der Tuin (Eds.), New materialism: Interviews and cartographies (pp. 48–70). Ann Arbor, MI: Open Humanities Press.Google Scholar
  9. Braidotti, R. (2013). Nomadic subjects: Embodiment and sexual difference in contemporary feminist theory. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Callon, M., & Latour, B. (1981). In K. Knorr & A. Cicourel (Eds.), Unscrewing the big leviathan: How do actors macrostructure reality. Advances in social theory and methodology. Toward an integration of micro and macro sociologies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Davis, B., & Sumara, D. J. (2005). Challenging images of knowing: Complexity science and educational research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 18(3), 305–321.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390500082293 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. De Freitas, E., & Palmer, A. (2015). How scientific concepts come to matter in early childhood curriculum: Rethinking the concept of force. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1–22.Google Scholar
  13. De Freitas, E., & Sinclair, N. (2012). Diagram, gesture, agency: Theorizing embodiment in the mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80(1–2), 133–152.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-011-9364-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. DeLanda, M. (2002). Virtual science, intensive philosophy. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  15. DeLanda, M. (2006). A new philosophy of society: Assemblage theory and social complexity. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  16. DeLanda, M. (2012, October 30). Manuel DeLanda. Assemblage theory and social institutions. 2011. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sZePCx8YUys
  17. Deleuze, G. (1988). Foucault. Minneapolis, MN, USA: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  18. Deleuze, G., & Bacon, F. (2003). Francis Bacon: The logic of sensation. Minneapolis, MN, USA: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  19. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  20. Dolphijn, R., & Van der Tuin, I. (Eds.). (2013). New materialism: Interviews and cartographies. Ann Arbor, MI: Open Humanities Press.Google Scholar
  21. Foucault, M. (2003). Polemics, politics, and problematizations: An interview with Michel Foucault. In P. Rabinow & N. Rose (Eds.), The essential Foucault, selections from essential works of Foucault, 1954–1984 (pp. 18–24). New York: New Press.Google Scholar
  22. Fox, N. J., & Alldred, P. (2015). New materialist social inquiry: Designs, methods and the research-assemblage. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 18(4), 399–414.Google Scholar
  23. Grosz, E. (2005). Time travels: Feminism, nature, power. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.  https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822386551 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Haraway, D. (1979). The biological enterprise: Sex, mind, and profit from human engineering to sociobiology. Radical History Review, 1979(20), 206–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Haraway, D. (1991). Simians, cyborgs and women: The reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2000). Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2009). Commonwealth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Hinton, P., & Van der Tuin, I. (2014). Preface. Women: A Cultural Review, 25(1): 1–8. Special issue ‘feminist matters: The politics of new materialism.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09574042.2014.901104 Google Scholar
  29. Kayumova, S., Karsli, E., Allexsaht-Snider, M., & Buxton, C. (2015). Latina mothers and daughters: Ways of knowing, being, and becoming in the context of bilingual family science workshops. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 46(3), 260–276.  https://doi.org/10.1111/aeq.12106 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Roth, W. M., & Tobin, K. (2004, September). Co-generative dialoguing and metaloguing: Reflexivity of processes and genres. Forum: Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 5(3). Retrieved from http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/560/1214

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of STEM Education & Teacher Development, Kaput Center for Research & Innovation in STEM EducationUniversity of Massachusetts DartmouthNorth DartmouthUSA
  2. 2.Faculty of EducationUniversity of ReginaReginaCanada

Personalised recommendations