Advertisement

Behavioral Interventions for Substance Use and Relapse Prevention

  • Mark D. GodleyEmail author
  • Lora L. Passetti
Chapter

Abstract

The past two decades have witnessed a dramatic increase in adolescent treatment research. Notable is the development and testing of family-based, motivational, cognitive behavioral, and contingency management therapies. Various levels of evidence support these interventions, with family therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), and the Adolescent Community Reinforcement Approach (A-CRA) having the strongest empirical verification. Additionally, 12-step oriented programs, accompanied by attendance at mutual aid meetings, have been studied. This chapter highlights the use of different therapies in treating adolescent substance use and provides an in-depth description of the A-CRA, a therapy that includes family and motivational/CBT strategies. Despite these advancements, relapse during this vulnerable age group remains a challenge, and there have been recent calls for treatment providers to keep patients engaged in recovery by finding ways to increase pleasurable activities and recovery capital. Research is recommended to better assess recovery capital domains and study the relationship of improved recovery capital to preventing relapse and improving long-term clinical outcomes.

Keywords

Behavioral interventions Adolescents Relapse Substance use treatment, Recovery capital Adolescent community reinforcement approach Prosocial activities 

References

  1. 1.
    Tanner-Smith EE, Wilson SJ, Lipsey MW. The comparative effectiveness of outpatient treatment for adolescent substance abuse: a meta-analysis. J Subst Abus Treat. 2013;44(2):145–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Waldron HB, Turner CW. Evidence-based psychosocial treatments for adolescent substance abuse. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2008;37(1):238–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bukstein OG, Bernet W, Arnold V, Beitchman J, Shaw J, Benson RS, Kinlan J, McClellan J, Stock S, Ptakowski KK, Work Group on Quality Issues. Practice parameter for the assessment and treatment of children and adolescents with substance use disorders. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2005;44(6):609–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kelly JF, Kaminer Y, Kahler CW, Hoeppner B, Yeterian J, Cristello JV, Timko C. A pilot randomized clinical trial testing integrated 12-step facilitation (iTSF) treatment for adolescent substance use disorder. Addiction. 2017;112(12):2155–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Best D, Honor S, Karpusheff J, Loudon L, Hall R, Groshkova T, White W. Well-being and recovery functioning among substance users engaged in post-treatment recovery support groups. Alcohol Treat Q. 2012;30:397–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    White W, Cloud W. Recovery capital: a primer for addictions professionals. Counselor. 2008;9(5):22–7.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cloud W, Granfield R. Conceptualizing recovery capital: expansion of a theoretical construct. Subst Use Misuse. 2008;43(12–13):1971–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Granfield R, Cloud W. Coming clean: overcoming addiction without treatment. New York: New York University Press; 1999.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Laudet AB, White WL. Recovery capital as prospective predictor of sustained recovery, life satisfaction, and stress among former poly-substance users. Subst Use Misuse. 2008;43(1):27–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Best D, Savic M, Beckwith M, Honor S, Karpusheff J, Lubman DI. The role of abstinence and activity in the quality of life of drug users engaged in treatment. J Subst Abus Treat. 2013;45:273–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Godley SH, Smith JE, Meyers RJ, Godley MD. The adolescent community reinforcement approach: a clinical guide for treating substance use disorders. Normal: Chestnut Health Systems; 2016.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Lighthouse Institute, Chestnut Health SystemsNormalUSA

Personalised recommendations