Advertisement

Effects of an Inclination-Controlled Active Spinal Exoskeleton on Spinal Compression Forces

  • A. S. Koopman
  • S. Toxiri
  • M. P. de Looze
  • I. Kingma
  • J. H. van Dieën
Conference paper
Part of the Biosystems & Biorobotics book series (BIOSYSROB, volume 22)

Abstract

Mechanical loading of the spine is a known risk factor for the development of low-back pain. The objective of this study was to assess the effect of an inclination-controlled exoskeleton on spinal compression forces during lifting with various techniques. Peak compression decreased on average by around 20%, and this was largely independent of lifting technique.

References

  1. 1.
    Hartvigsen, J., et al.: What low back pain is and why we need to pay attention. The Lancet (2018)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Thiese, M.S., et al.: Prevalence of low back pain by anatomic location and intensity in an occupational population. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 15(1), 283 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Coenen, P., et al.: The effect of lifting during work on low back pain: a health impact assessment based on a meta-analysis. Occup. Environ. Med. 71(12), 871–877 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Eurofound, Trends in job quality in Europe. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg (2012)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Toxiri, S., et al., Rationale, Implementation and Evaluation of Assistive Strategies for an Active Back-Support Exoskeleton. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 2018. 5(53): pGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kingma, I., et al.: Validation of a full body 3-D dynamic linked segment model. Hum. Mov. Sci. 15(6), 833–860 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    van Dieën, J.H.: Are recruitment patterns of the trunk musculature compatible with a synergy based on the maximization of endurance? J. Biomech. 30(11–12), 1095–1100 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    van Dieen, J.H., Kingma, I.: Effects of antagonistic co-contraction on differences between electromyography based and optimization based estimates of spinal forces. Ergonomics 48(4), 411–426 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. S. Koopman
    • 1
  • S. Toxiri
    • 2
  • M. P. de Looze
    • 1
  • I. Kingma
    • 1
  • J. H. van Dieën
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement SciencesVrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement SciencesAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of Advanced RoboticsIstituto Italiano di TecnologiaGenoaItaly

Personalised recommendations