Contribution of a Knee Orthosis to Walking

  • O. BordronEmail author
  • C. Huneau
  • É. Le Carpentier
  • Y. Aoustin
Conference paper
Part of the Biosystems & Biorobotics book series (BIOSYSROB, volume 22)


This study is devoted to investigate the influence of a knee orthosis for human walking by using a mathematical model for a 7-links planar biped - composed with two identical legs, two feet and one trunk - with an orthosis attached to both thigh and calf, during walking. In the first part, we design a cyclic walking gait in the sagittal plane for human without the orthosis. The second part we consider that the human looses his muscular possibilities in one of his knees. To overcome his handicap the human is equipped of a knee orthosis. We analyse the positive effect of the orthosis over the assisted knee to track the previous designed reference trajectory. By using at each time an optimisation algorithm, we minimise the torques provided by the human. The numerical tests confirm the possibility to reduce the torque produced in the disabled knee. The next step is to take into account explicitly an information from EMG signal during a walking to modulate the power of the orthosis.


  1. 1.
    Schmitt, C.: A study of a knee extension controlled by a closed loop functional electrical stimulation. In: Proceedings of 9th Annual Conference of the International FES Society, Bournemouth, pp. 135–137 (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mefoued, S.: A second order sliding mode control and a neural network to drive a knee joint actuated orthosis. Neurocomputing 155, 71–79 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Huo, W., Mohammed, S., Moreno, J.C., Amirat, Y.: Lower limb wearable robots for assistance and rehabilitation: a state of the art. IEEE Syst. J. 10, 1068–1081 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tlalolini, D., Aoustin, Y., Chevallereau, C.: Design of a walking cyclic gait with single support phases and impacts for the locomotor system of a thirteen-link 3D biped using the parametric optimization. Multibody Syst. Dyn. 23, 33 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Aoustin, Y., Formalskii, A.M.: Strategy to lock the knee of exoskeleton stance leg: study in the framework of ballistic walking model. In: Wenger, P., Chevallereau, C., Doina, D., Bleuler, H., Rodi, A. (eds.) New Trends in Medical and Service Robots, vol. 3, pp. 179–195. Springer (2016)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Aoustin, Y., Formalskii, A.M.: Walking of biped with passive exoskeleton: evaluation of energy consumption. Multibody Syst. Dyn. 43, 1–26 (2017)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Xiang, Y., Arora, J.S., Abdel-Malek, K.: Optimization-based prediction of asymmetric human gait. J. Biomech. 44(4), 683–693 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bordron, O., Le Carpentier, É., Huneau, C., Aoustin, Y.: Impact of a knee orthosis over walking. In: Arakelian, V., Wenger, P. (ed.) ROMANSY 22 – Robot Design, Dynamics and Control, pp. 466–473. Springer (2019)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mefoued, S., Mohammed, S., Amirat, Y., Fried, G.: Sit-to-stand movement assistance using an actuated knee joint orthosis. In: International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics, Rome, pp. 1753–1758 (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • O. Bordron
    • 1
    Email author
  • C. Huneau
    • 1
  • É. Le Carpentier
    • 1
  • Y. Aoustin
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Nantes, Centrale Nantes, LS2N, UMR CNRS 6004NantesFrance

Personalised recommendations