Advertisement

The Concept of Methodological Framework for the Design of Information Systems

  • Yury Rogozov
  • Sergei Kucherov
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 875)

Abstract

The problem of agreeing points of view on the target system being developed, often inseparable from the problem of mutual understanding of stakeholders in the process of developing information systems, as a special case of complex technical systems, is one of the fundamental for today. According to researchers, the reason for this situation is the inconsistency of the image of the target system, which arises from a misunderstanding between the customer and the developer. The overwhelming majority of modern research and practical developments are aimed at solving the problem of mutual understanding between two participants in the life cycle of information systems, located at its neighboring stages. The analyst, using the most advanced methods and techniques, can get a 100% reliable description of the customer’s wishes (requirements), but he is still neither a domain specialist nor a designer (programmer). To solve this problem, we propose the methodology for the creation of information systems on the basis of a single consistent representation in the form of a means of creating concepts and its implementation in the development process.

Keywords

Information system Design Life cycle Structure Coordination Process Graph 

Notes

Acknowledgment

The reported study was funded by RFBR according to the research project № 18-07-00908.

References

  1. 1.
    Chanron, V., Lewis, K.: A study of convergence in decentralized design processes. Res. Eng. Des. 16(3), 133–145 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Austin-Breneman, J., Yu, B.Y., Yang, M.C.: Biased information through subsystems over time in complex system design. 17 August 2014. V007T07A023Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yassine, A., Braha, D.: Complex concurrent engineering and the design structure matrix method. Concurr Eng. 11(3), 165–176 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Li, F., Wu, T., Hu, M.: Design of a decentralized framework for collaborative product design using memetic algorithms. Optim. Eng. 15(3), 657–676 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Athula, G.: Meta-design paradigm based approach for iterative rapid development of enterprise WEB applications. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Software and Data Technologies, ICSOFT, pp. 337–343 (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fischer, G., Giaccardi, E.: Meta design: a framework for the future of end user development. In: Lieberman, H., Paterno, F., Wulf, V. (eds.) End User Development: Empowering People to flexibly Employ Advanced Information and Communication Technology, vol. 9, 427–457. SpringerGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rossi, C., Guevara, A., Enciso, M., Caro, J.L., Mora, A.: A tool for user-guided database application development - automatic design of XML models using CBD. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Software and Data Technologies, ICSOFT 2010, vol. 2, pp. 195–201 (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Liang, X.D., Kop, C., Ginige, A., Mayr, H.C.: Turning concepts into reality - bridging requirement engineering and model-driven generation of web applications. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Software and Data Technologies, ICSOFT 2007, Volume ISDM/ EHST/ DC, pp. 109–116 (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stahl, T., Völter, M.: Model-Driven Software Development: Technology, Engineering, Management, 1st edn. Wiley (2006)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Frankel, D.: Model Driven Architecture - Applying MDA to Enterprise Computing. OMG Press, Indianapolis (2003)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lyadova, L.N.: The technology of creation of dynamically adapted information systems. In: Proceedings Scientific-Technology Conference “Intellectual Systems” (AIS 2007). Fizmatlit, Moscow T. 2 (2007)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Clear, J.: Systemology Automation of the solution of system problems. Radio Commun. (1990)534 pp. Translated from English by Zuev, M.A., edited by Gorlin, A.IGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Egenev, G.B.: Systemology of engineering knowledge: a manual for universities on the specialty “Computer-aided design systems” in the direction “Computer science and computer technology”/GB Egenev. MSTU. N.E. Bauman (2001. - 376 sec. - (Informatics in Technical University). - ISBN 5-7038-1524-XGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pospelov, D.A.: Situational management: theory and practice. Science, Moscow. Ch. Ed. fiz.-mat. lit. (1986). 288 pGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Finn, V.K.: On the possibility of formalizing plausible reasoning by the means of many-valued logics. In: Vsesoyuzn. Simp. by the Logic and Methodology of Science, pp. 82–83. Naukova Dumka, Kiev (1976)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Algorithm for solving inventive problems (ARIZ) 1959 (together with R. Shapiro) (1985)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nikanorov, S.P., Nikitina, N.K., Teslinov, A.G.: Introduction to the Conceptual Design of Automated Control Systems: Analysis and Synthesis of Structures. Izd, Moscow. Strategic Missile Forces (1995). 185cGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nikanorov, S.P.: Theoretical and system constructs for conceptual analysis and design. Concept (2006). 312 pGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nikanorov, S.P.: Postulate of conceptual models of subject domains containing hundreds of thousands of concepts. Subset, Concept, Moscow, issue 21, pp. 42–61 (2006)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nikanorov, S.P.: Conceptualization of Subject Areas. Methodology and Technology, Moscow, Concept (2009). 268 pGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nikanorov, S.P.: Introduction to the apparatus stages and its application. Moscow, Concept (2010). 179 pGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Addo-Tenkorang, R.: Concurrent Engineering (CE): a review literature report. In: Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science 2011 Vol II. USA, San Francisco, IAENG, International Association of Engineers (2011)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Myerson, R.B.: Game Theory. Harvard University Press (1997). 588 pGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Crawley, E., Cameron, B., Selva, D.: System architecture: strategy and product development for complex systems, p. 448. Prentice Hall, Pearson (2015)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ross, A.M., Hastings, D.E.: The tradespace exploration paradigm. INCOSE Int Symp. 15(1), 1706–1718 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Systems Engineering Handbook. A guide for system life cycle process and activities. International Council on System Engineering. INCOSE-TP-2003-002-03, June 2006Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gianni, D., D’Ambrogio, A., Tolk, A., eds.: Modeling and Simulation-Based Systems Engineering Handbook, 1 edn. CRC Press, December 2014. ISBN 9781466571457Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Leffingwell, D., Widrig, D.: Software Requirements Management, Addison Wesley (1999)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Go, K., Carroll, J.M.: The Blind Men and the Elephant: Views of the Scenario-Based System Design. Interactions 11(6), 44–53 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Southern Federal UniversityTaganrogRussian Federation

Personalised recommendations