Modern Approaches to Risk Situation Modeling in Creation of Complex Technical Systems

  • Anna E. KolodenkovaEmail author
  • Evgenia R. Muntyan
  • Vladimir V. Korobkin
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 875)


Creation of complex technical systems (CTS) is complicated iterative process, which is connected with considerable expenses of material, labor and financial resources together with many arising risk situations caused by constructive defects, industrial releases of unproven technologies, staff faults, inadequate skill level, etc. It can lead to sufficient backlog or fall of CTS creation project. Therefore modeling of the risk situations arising during creation of complex technical systems in the conditions of fuzzy input data is the relevant. Two modern approaches are proposed to detect and predict risk situations: fuzzy cognitive modeling and situation modeling. The convolution algorithm is presented for situation graph generalization. The construction and impulse modeling for fuzzy cognitive model of risk detection in nuclear industry is considered. The results of modeled scenarios of possible risk evolution and their analysis are shown. Proposed approaches allow to identify and analyze the facts impacting on risk situation, obtain possible scenarios of emergence, find the decision ways in modeled situations. It can be used a basis in the production of scientifically proven management actions.


Risk situations Complex technical system Fuzzy cognitive modelling Situation modelling Fuzzy data 


  1. 1.
    Yurkov, N.K.: System approach to the organization of life cycle of difficult technical systems. Reliab. Qual. Difficult Syst. Sci. Pract. Mag. 1, 27–35 (2013). (in Russian)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Korobkin, V.V., Kolodenkova, A.E., Kukharenko, A.P.: Accounting of risk situations when modeling the designing process of complex managing systems on the basis of cognitive models. News of SFU. Technical science vol. 9, pp. 103–111 (2017). (in Russian)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Katalevskiy, D.Yu.: Fundamentals of simulation and system analysis in management: a tutorial (2011). (in Russian)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kulinich, A.A.: Methodology of cognitive modeling of complex ill-defined situations.
  5. 5.
    Abramova, N.A., Avdeeva, Z.K.: Cognitive analysis and management of the development of situations: the problems of methodology, theory and practice (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dickerson, J., Kosko, B.: Virtual worlds as fuzzy cognitive maps. In: Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium, pp. 471–477 (1993)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wang, C., Chen, S., Chen, K.: Using fuzzy cognitive map and structural equation model for market-oriented hotel and performance. Afr. J. Bus. Manag. 5(28), 11358–11374 (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Silov, V.B.: Making Strategic Decisions in a Fuzzy Environment. INPRO-RES, Moscow (1995) (in Russian)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Borisov, V.V., Kruglov, V.V., Fedulov, A.S.: Fuzzy models and networks. Hot line - Telecom, Moscow (2007). (in Russian)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Papageorgiou, E.I., Stylios, C.D., Groumpos, P.P.: Active Hebbian learning algorithm to train fuzzy cognitive maps Internet. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 37, 219–249 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Carvalho, J.P.: On the semantics and the use of fuzzy cognitive maps and dynamic cognitive maps in social sciences. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 214, 6–19 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kosko, B.: Fuzzy cognitive maps. Int. J. Man Mach. Stud. 1, 65–75 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kolodenkova, A.E.: Modeling of process of feasibility of the project on creation of management information systems using fuzzy cognitive models. Mess. Comput. Inf. Technol. 6(144), 10–17 (2016). (in Russian)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nguyen, D., Fisher, D.C., Stephens, R.L.: A graph-based approach to situation assessment. Accessed 13 July 2018
  15. 15.
    Gavgani, M.H., Eftekharnejad, S.: A graph model for enhancing situational awareness in power systems. Accessed 13 July 2018
  16. 16.
    Sergeev, N.E., Muntyan, E.R., Tselykh, A.A., Samoylov, A.N.: Situation graph generalization for situation awareness using a list-based folding algorithm. News of SFU. Technical science, vol. 3, pp. 111–121 (2017). (in Russian)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cormen, T.H., Leiserson, C.E., Rivest, R.L., Stein, C.: Introduction to Algorithms, 3rd edn. The MIT Press, McGraw-Hill Book Company (2009)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Foster, J.M.: List Processing, p. 54. Macdonald, London (1968)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sergeev, N.E., Muntyan, E.R.: Using convolution algorithm to separate a graph on the proportional subgraphs. Vestnik UGATU, vol. 22, no. 1(79), pp. 121–130 (2018). (in Russian)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anna E. Kolodenkova
    • 1
    Email author
  • Evgenia R. Muntyan
    • 2
  • Vladimir V. Korobkin
    • 3
  1. 1.Samara State Technical UniversitySamaraRussia
  2. 2.Scientific Research Institute of the Multiprocessor Computing Systems of Southern Federal UniversityTaganrogRussia
  3. 3.Southern Federal UniversityTaganrogRussia

Personalised recommendations