Advertisement

Introduction to This Volume

  • Don BerkichEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Philosophical Studies Series book series (PSSP, volume 134)

Abstract

The 2016 meeting of the International Association for Computing and Philosophy brought together a highly interdisciplinary consortium of scholars eager to share their current research at the increasingly important intersection of a number of fields, including computer science, robotics engineering, artificial intelligence, logic, biology, cognitive science, economics, sociology, and philosophy. This introductory chapter serves to organize and connect the discussions across these domains of inquiry, describing both the insights and broad relevance of the research well represented in this volume.

Keywords

International Association for Computing and Philosophy Computation Information Logic Epistemology Science Cognition Mind Robotics Ethics Trust Privacy Justice 

References

  1. Arrow, K. 1962. Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors, 609–626. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Boolos, G., and J. Jeffrey. 1989. Computability and Logic, 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Carnap, R. 1998. The value of laws: Explanation and prediction. In Philosophy of Science: The Central Issues, 2nd ed., ed. M. Curd and J. Cover, 678–684. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  4. Church, A. 1932. A set of postulates for the foundation of logic. Annals of Mathematics (2nd Series) 33(2): 346–366.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. D’Agostino, M., and F. Luciano. 2009. The enduring scandal of deduction is propositional logic really uninformative? Synthese 167: 271–315.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dennett, D. 1987. The Intentional Stance. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  7. Eliasmith, C., and O. Trujillo. 2014. The use and abuse of large-scale brain models. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 25: 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fetzer, J. 2014. Information: Does it have to be true? Minds and Machines 14(2): 223–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Floridi, L. 2007. In defence of the veridical nature of semantic information. European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 3(1): 31–42.Google Scholar
  10. Frege, G. 1980. On sense and reference. In Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege, 3rd ed., ed. P. Geach and M. Black, 36–56. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  11. Gilbert, M. 2014. Joint Commitment: How We Make the Social World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Gödel, K. 1931. Über formal unentscheidbare sätze der principia mathematica und verwandter systeme i. Monatshefte für Mathematik und Physik 33: 173–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hempel, C. 1998a. Two basic types of scientific explanation. In Philosophy of Science: The Central Issues, 2nd ed., ed. M. Curd and J. Cover, 685–694. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  14. Hempel, C. 1998b. Two basic types of scientific explanation. In Philosophy of Science: The Central Issues, 2nd ed., ed. M. Curd and J. Cover, 808–825. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  15. Kramer, A.I., J.E. Guillory, and J.T. Hancook. 2014. Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111(24): 8788–8790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Piccinini, G. 2017. Computation in physical systems. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. E.N. Zalta. Stanford, Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, summer 2017 edition.Google Scholar
  17. Putnam, H. 1975. Minds and Machines, 362–386. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Scarantino, A., and G. Piccinini. 2010. Information without truth. Metaphilosophy 41(3): 314–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Shannon, C.E. 1949. Communication theory of secrecy systems. Bell System Technical Journal 28(4): 656–715.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Turing, A. 1936. On computable numbers, with an application to the entscheidungsproblem. Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society 42: 230–265.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of HumanitiesTexas A&M University – Corpus ChristiCorpus ChristiUSA

Personalised recommendations