Advertisement

Interdisciplinarity of Cultural Heritage Conservation Making and Makers: Through Diversity Towards Compatibility of Approaches

  • Anna Lobovikov-KatzEmail author
  • João Martins
  • Marinos Ioannides
  • Dalik Sojref
  • Christian Degrigny
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11196)

Abstract

In conservation of cultural heritage (CCH), experts from diverse areas of knowledge work together, each of them contributing unique expertise. However, in modern dynamic multi- and interdisciplinary collaboration, new contributors often remain conservation outsiders, being deeply submerged in their own research areas with regard to their research methods, their view of hierarchy of aims and values of conservation of cultural heritage, etc. Their understanding of targets of input and outcome of their compartmentalized contribution to specific conservation problems might be incompatible with the principles and criteria of modern CCH, thus affecting productivity of such contribution. This paper focuses on this conflict by examining selected relevant aspects based on the experience of the collaborative interdisciplinary research in conservation of cultural heritage.

Keywords

Interdisciplinarity Interdisciplinary research Conservation of cultural heritage (CCH) Compatibility 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This article is based upon work from COST Action TD1406 i2MHB - Innovation in Intelligent Management of Heritage Buildings, supported by COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology).

References

  1. 1.
    Tobi, H., Kampen, J.K.: Research design: the methodology for interdisciplinary research framework. Qual. Quant. 52(3), 1209–1225 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Eisenberg, L., Pellmar, T.C. (eds.): Bridging Disciplines in the Brain, Behavioral, and Clinical Sciences, Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Building Bridges in the Brain, Behavioral, and Clinical Sciences. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, Medicine Press, Washington (DC) (2000)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lobovikov-Katz, A., Bueno Benito, G., Marcos Sánchez, V., Martins, J., Sojref, D.: Training schools for conservation of cultural heritage: between expertise, management and education. In: Ioannides, M., et al. (eds.) EuroMed 2016. LNCS, vol. 10058, pp. 880–890. Springer, Cham (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48496-9_71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lobovikov-Katz, A.: The virtual and the real: e-learning in interdisciplinary education - the case of cultural heritage. In: The 13th Annual MEITAL National Conference “New Technologies and Their Evaluation in Online Teaching and Learning”. Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, June 2015 http://meital.iucc.ac.il/conf2015/papers15/A3_3.pdf
  5. 5.
    Jokilehto, J.: A History of Architectural Conservation, Butterworth Heinemann, in association with ICCROM. The Bath Press, Bath (1999)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Feilden, B.M.: Conservation of Historic Buildings (3rd edn/ebook) (2001)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Harvey, J.: Conservation of Buildings. John Baker, London (1972)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ruskin, J.: The Seven Lamps of Architecture. Bryan Taylor, New York (1894)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lobovikov-Katz, A., Konstanti, A., Labropoulos, K., Moropoulou, A., Cassar, J., De Angelis, R.: The EUROMED 4 project “ELAICH”: e-Tools for a teaching environment on EU mediterranean cultural heritage. In: Ioannides, M., Fritsch, D., Leissner, J., Davies, R., Remondino, F., Caffo, R. (eds.) EuroMed 2012. LNCS, vol. 7616, pp. 710–719. Springer, Heidelberg (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34234-9_75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hazan, S., Katz, A.L.: The Willing Suspension of Disbelief: The Tangible and the Intangible of Heritage Education in E-Learning and Virtual Museums. In: Ioannides, M., Magnenat-Thalmann, N., Papagiannakis, G. (eds.) Mixed Reality and Gamification for Cultural Heritage, pp. 549–566. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49607-8_22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    COST Action TD1406 i2MHB-Innovation in Intelligent Management of Heritage Buildings http://www.cost.eu/COST_Actions/tdp/TD1406? Accessed 12 Aug 2018
  12. 12.
    Lobovikov-Katz, A.: The correlation between the technological and conservation aspects and those of urban appearance in a stone-built environment: an evaluation approach. In: Kourkoulis, S. (ed.) Fracture and Failure of Natural Building Stones – Applications in the Restoration of the Ancient Monuments, Chap. 4.2, pp. 201–213. Springer, Dordrecht (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5077-0_13

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anna Lobovikov-Katz
    • 1
    Email author
  • João Martins
    • 2
  • Marinos Ioannides
    • 3
  • Dalik Sojref
    • 4
  • Christian Degrigny
    • 5
  1. 1.Faculty of Architecture and Town PlanningTechnion - Israel Institute of TechnologyHaifaIsrael
  2. 2.Faculty of Sciences and Technology (UNL) and UNINOVALisbonPortugal
  3. 3.Department of Electrical Engineering, Computer Engineering and InformaticsCyprus University of TechnologyLimassolCyprus
  4. 4.WTTCBerlinGermany
  5. 5.Sarl Germolles Palais Ducal en BourgogneMelleceyFrance

Personalised recommendations