Advertisement

eDIRICA: Digitizing Cultural Heritage for Learning, Creativity, and Inclusiveness

  • Olufemi Samson AdetunjiEmail author
  • Clement Essien
  • Oluwatosin Samuel Owolabi
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11196)

Abstract

The integration of information and communication tools to the management of cultural heritage (CH) promotes culture-based creativity, historical learning and awareness, cultural diversity and social cohesion. However, various developing countries are facing challenges due to inadequate infrastructure to support the integration. In Nigeria, for instance, heritage sites are mainly protected for tourism purposes with little focus on the educational purposes and the broader impacts of CH within the community. This paper, therefore, describes the planning stage for the development of eDIRICA, a Web-app tool that incorporates learning, peoples’ engagement and creativity to create a new paradigm for the management of cultural heritage in Nigeria. The rationale is to document heritage sites and convert the information into knowledge through the creation of interactive learning modules, collaborative activities and events. Primary information were collected through questionnaire survey of randomly selected school students and teachers. Semi-structured interviews were also conducted for heritage managers of three CHs. The study finds that heritage education is not included in school curriculum, inadequate trained teachers and collaboration between heritage managers and school administrators. Also, young people are interested in engaging and learning about cultural heritage through digital platforms in view to contribute to the development of their communities.

Keywords

Digitization Cultural heritage eLearning 

References

  1. 1.
    Ovidia, S.-M.: Heritage conservation in secondary education curriculum a didactic proposal based on the application of ICT. Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci. 51, 782–786 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yastikli, N.: Documentation of cultural heritage using digital photogrammetry and laser scanning. J. Cult. Herit. 8, 423–427 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2007.06.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Eisazadeh, N., Houbart, C., Hallot, P., Heylighen, A.: The Potential of Digital Tools and Technologies in Architectural Heritage Research for an Inclusive Approach to Built Heritage (2017)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Soto-Martín, O., Lodeiro-Santiago, M.: Apps in the practice and teaching of conservation and restoration of cultural heritage. Procedia Comput. Sci. 75, 381–389 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.12.261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kabassi, K.: Evaluating websites of museums: state of the art. J. Cult. Herit. 24, 184–196 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2016.10.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ocal, T.: Necessity of cultural historical heritage education in social studies teaching. Creat. Educ. 7, 396 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2016.73039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mendoza, R., Baldiris, S., Fabregat, R.: Framework to heritage education using emerging technologies. Procedia Comput. Sci. 75, 239–249 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.12.244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ott, M., Pozzi, F.: Towards a new era for cultural heritage education: discussing the role of ICT. Comput. Hum. Behav. 27, 1365–1371 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.07.031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Andersson, A., Grönlund, Å.: A conceptual framework for E-learning in developing countries: a critical review of research challenges. Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Dev. Ctries. 38, 1–16 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1681-4835.2009.tb00271.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sobaih, A.E.E., Moustafa, M.A., Ghandforoush, P., Khan, M.: To use or not to use? Social media in higher education in developing countries. Comput. Hum. Behav. 58, 296–305 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.01.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Council of Europe: Council of Europe Framework Convention on the Value of Cultural Heritage for Society. Council of Europe Treaty Series, vol. 199 (2005, Council of Europe)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lim, V., Frangakis, N., Tanco, L.M., Picinali, L.: PLUGGY: a pluggable social platform for cultural heritage awareness and participation. In: Ioannides, M., Martins, J., Žarnić, R., Lim, V. (eds.) Advances in Digital Cultural Heritage. LNCS, vol. 10754, pp. 117–129. Springer, Cham (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75789-6_9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bloom, D.E., Mckinnon, R.: Program on the G lobal change, pp. 1–21 (2010)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Melorose, J., Perroy, R., Careas, S.: World population prospects. United Nations 1, 587–592 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    UNDESA Population Division: Population 2030: Demographic challenges and opportunities for sustainable development planning. United Nations 58 (2015)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Anderson, E.F., et al.: Developing serious games for cultural heritage: a state-of-the-art review. Virtual Real. 14, 255–275 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-010-0177-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jeannotte, M.S.: Singing alone? The contribution of cultural capital to social cohesion and sustainable communities. Int. J. Cult. Policy 9, 35–49 (2003).  https://doi.org/10.1080/1028663032000089507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cameron, F., Kenderdine, S.: Theorizing Digital Cultural Heritage: A Critical Discourse. MIT Press, Cambridge (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ardissono, L., Kuflik, T., Petrelli, D.: Personalization in cultural heritage: the road travelled and the one ahead. User Model. User-Adapt. Interact. 22, 73–99 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-011-9104-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Aldous, J., Hill, R.: Social cohesion, lineage type, and intergenerational transmission. Soc. Forces 43, 471–482 (1965)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Liu, S.B.: Grassroots heritage: a multi-method investigation of how social media sustain the living heritage of historic crises. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses 723, n/a (2011)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Abbassi, Z., Hegde, N., Massoulié, L.: Distributed content curation on the web. ACM Trans. Internet Technol. 14, 1–15 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1145/2663489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Minelli, S.H., et al.: MOVIO: a toolkit for creating curated digital exhibitions. Procedia Comput. Sci. 38, 28–33 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2014.10.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Oomen, J., Aroyo, L.: Crowdsourcing in the cultural heritage domain. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Communities and Technologies - C&T 2011, p. 138 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1145/2103354.2103373
  25. 25.
    Affleck, J., Kvan, T.: A virtual community as the context for discursive interpretation: a role in cultural heritage engagement. Int. J. Herit. Stud. 14, 268–280 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1080/13527250801953751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Giaccardi, E., Palen, L.: The social production of heritage through cross-media interaction: making place for place-making. Int. J. Herit. Stud. 14, 281–297 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1080/13527250801953827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Greer, S.: Heritage and empowerment: community-based Indigenous cultural heritage in northern Australia. Int. J. Herit. Stud. 16, 45–58 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1080/13527250903441754CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Architecture and Built EnvironmentUniversity of NewcastleCallaghanAustralia
  2. 2.Department of ArchitectureFederal University of Technology, AkureAkureNigeria
  3. 3.NERD Multi PartnershipsLagosNigeria
  4. 4.Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer ScienceUniversity of MissouriColumbiaUSA
  5. 5.Department of Architectural TechnologyFederal PolytechnicNasarawaNigeria

Personalised recommendations