Advertisement

Conclusion

  • Mohamed Mahmood
Chapter
Part of the Springer Theses book series (Springer Theses)

Abstract

Over the years, citizens’ trust and confidence in their governments has continued to decline and digital government is expected to reverse this trend. An enormous amount of money has been spent worldwide, on electronic government initiatives that are focused on improving performance, reducing costs and enhancing citizens' trust and confidence in their governments. Yet, of the many initiatives that have been implemented, very few have achieved real transformation of government (i.e. fundamental changes to the way core functions of government are performed to achieve noticeable gains in performance and efficiency). As such, there is a need to understand how transformation of government as a construct affects citizens’ trust and confidence in government in the presence of factors such as, government performance and citizen satisfaction. This research empirically investigates the influence of digital transformation of government on citizens’ trust and confidence in the context of the Kingdom of Bahrain. Bahrain is a top ranking country in terms of use of ICT in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) region. A conceptual model was developed and validated using an online survey targeting randomly citizens of the Kingdom of Bahrain. Based on 313 responses, the findings of this research suggest that citizens' trust and confidence in their government is positively influenced by transformation of government, mediated by government performance and citizens’ satisfaction. The study found that e-government and technology are not enough for achieving a real transformation of government, and therefore, in tackling the decline in citizens’ trust and confidence in government. Other factors were found to be important in this equation, including transparency and accountability of government functions and activities in meeting citizens' expectations. The research offer multiple policy implications and theoretical contributions, in addition to helping understand how digital transformation of government can enhance citizens' trust and confidence in government, improve government-to-citizen relationship, and increase the adoption of digital services offered by governments. From a policy perspective, this research offers a validated conceptual model that can be used as a frame of reference when planning ICT-enabled transformation projects in government. From a theoretical context, this study is the first to investigate the relationship between transformation of government and citizens' trust and confidence in government.

References

  1. Bannister F, Connolly R (2011) Trust and transformational government: a proposed framework for research. Gov Info Q 28(2):137–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bean C (2015) Changing citizen confidence: orientations towards political and social institutions in Australia, 1983–2010. The Open Polit Sci J 8(1):1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bertot JC, Jaeger PT, Grimes JM (2010) Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Gov Inf Q 27(3):264–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bouckaert G, Van de Walle S, Kampen JK (2005) Potential for comparative public opinion research in public administration. Int Rev Adm Sci 71(2):229–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bryman A (2004) Social research methods, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  6. Creswell JW (2003) Research design: quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publication Inc., Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  7. Dalton RJ (2005) The social transformation of trust in government. Int Rev Sociol 15(1):133–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Edwards M (2015) The trust deficit—concepts and causes of low public trust in governments. Committee of Experts on Public Administration, Fourteenth session, 20–24 April 2015, Item 3 of the provisional agendaGoogle Scholar
  9. International Labour Office (2015) World employment and social outlook: trends 2015. International Labour OrganizationGoogle Scholar
  10. International Labour Office (2016) World employment and social outlook: trends 2016. International Labour OrganizationGoogle Scholar
  11. International Labour Office (2017) World employment and social outlook: trends 2017. International Labour OrganizationGoogle Scholar
  12. Kim S, Kim HJ, Lee H (2009) An institutional analysis of an e-government system for anti-corruption: the case of OPEN. Gov Info Q 26(1):42–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Morgeson FV, Petrescu C (2011) Do they all perform alike? An examination of perceived performance, citizen satisfaction and trust with US federal agencies. Int Rev Adm Sci 77(3):451–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Morgeson FV, VanAmburg D, Mithas S (2011) Misplaced trust? Exploring the structure of the e-government-citizen trust relationship. J Public Adm Res Theor 21(2):257–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. O’Neill R (2009) The transformative impact of E-Government on public governance in New Zealand. Public Manag Rev 11(6):751–770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Saunders MN (2011) Research methods for business students. 5/e. Pearson Education IndiaGoogle Scholar
  17. Teo TS, Srivastava SC, Jiang L (2008) Trust and electronic government success: an empirical study. J Manage Info Syst 25(3):99–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Tolbert CJ, Mossberger K (2006) The effects of E-Government on trust and confidence in government. Public Adm Rev 66(3):354–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. United Nations (2012) E-government survey 2012: e-government for the people. Department of Economic and Social Affairs Division for Public Administration and Development ManagementGoogle Scholar
  20. United Nations (2014) E-government survey 2014: e-government for the future we want. Department of Economic and Social Affairs Division for Public Administration and Development ManagementGoogle Scholar
  21. United Nations (2016) E-government survey 2016: e-government in Support of Sustainable Development. Department of Economic and Social Affairs Division for Public Administration and Development ManagementGoogle Scholar
  22. Van de Walle S, Bouckaert G (2003) Public service performance and trust in government: the problem of causality. Int J Public Adm 26(8–9):891–913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Van de Walle S, Van Roosbroek S, Bouckaert G (2008) Trust in the public sector: is there any evidence for a long-term decline? Int Rev Adm Sci 74(1):47–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Waller P, Weerakkody V (2016) Digital government: overcoming the systemic failure of transformation. Working Paper 2. Brunel University, LondonGoogle Scholar
  25. Weerakkody V, Janssen M, Dwivedi Y (eds) (2009) Handbook of research on ICT enabled transformational government: a global perspective. Info Sci Ref, Hershey, PAGoogle Scholar
  26. Welch EW, Hinnant CC, Moon MJ (2005) Linking citizen satisfaction with e-government and trust in government. J Public Adm Res Theor 15(3):371–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. West DM (2004) E-Government and the transformation of service delivery and citizen attitudes. Public Adm Rev 64(1):15–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zwahr T, Finger M, Müller P (2005) More than digitisation-the transformative potential of e-governance: an exploratory case study. In: Proceedings of the 38th annual Hawaii international conference on System sciences, 2005, HICSS’05, IEEE, pp. 127–127Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Brunel Business SchoolBrunel University LondonUxbridge, LondonUK

Personalised recommendations