Advertisement

Masculinity, Disability and Sexual Publics

  • Anna Hickey-MoodyEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

The field of disability studies has engaged with Deleuze and Guattari’s work in a fashion almost unprecedented by other empirically oriented disciplines, perhaps with the exception of education. In this chapter, I survey work on the sociology of disability, and disability studies more broadly, in which Deleuze, and Deleuze and Guattari’s, work has provided scholars with useful resources to think through social and cultural dynamics articulating across disability. The ways disability and masculinity are formulated in relation to each other is a contentious issue, because the social construction of disability often regulates the kinds of publics that are called to engage with texts featuring men with disabilities, and the kinds of context in which men with disabilities are welcomed. Taking my cue from the preceding chapter, I do not go so far as to suggest exactly what a Deleuzo-Guattarian informed version of disability studies might look like.

Works Cited

  1. Barberis, D. S. (2017). Hysteria in the male: Images of masculinity in later nineteenth century France. In J. K. M. Brian & J. W. Trent (Eds.), Phallacies: Historical intersections of disability and masculinity. Oxford, UK: Oxford Scholarship Online.Google Scholar
  2. Barrett, T. (2014). Disabled masculinites: A review and suggestions for further research. Masculinites and Social Change, 3(1), 36–61.  https://doi.org/10.4471/mcs.2014.41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Batty, R., McGrath, L., & Reavey, P. (2014). Embodying limb absence in the negotiation of sexual intimacy. Sexualities, 17(5–6), 686–706.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460714532935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Björnsdóttir, K., Stefánsdóttir, A., & Stefánsdóttir, G. V. (2017). People with intellectual disabilities negotiate autonomy, gender and sexuality. Sexuality and Disability, 35, 295–311.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11195-017-9492-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bourke, J. (2016). Love and limblessness: Male heterosexuality, disability, and the great war. Journal for War and Culture Studies, 9(1), 3–19.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17526272.2015.1106756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Caso, F. (2017). Sexing the disabled veteran: The homoerotic aesthetics of militarism. Critical Military Studies, 3(3), 217–234.  https://doi.org/10.1080/23337486.2016.1184420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cherney, J. L., & Lindemann, K. (2014). Queering Street: Homosocioality, masculinity, and disability in Friday Night Lights. Western Journal of Communication, 78(1), 1–21.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2013.792388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crowley, V. (2010). A rhizomatics of hearing: Becoming deaf in the workplace and other affective spaces of hearing. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 31(4), 543–558.Google Scholar
  9. Deleuze, G. (1992). Expressionism in philosophy: Spinoza. New York, USA: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  10. Earle, S. (1999). Facilitated sex and the concept of sexual need: Disabled students and their personal assistants. Disability and Society, 14(3), 309–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ellis, K., & Goggin, G. (2015). Disability media participation: Opportunities, obstacles and politics. Media International Australia, 154(1), 78–88.Google Scholar
  12. Ellis, K., & Goggin, G. (2018). Disability and media activism. In G. Meikle (Ed.), The Routledge companion to media and activism (pp. 355–364). Oxford and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Feely, M. (2016a). Sexual surveillance and control in a community-based intellectual disability service. Sexualities, 19(5–6), 725–750.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460715620575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Feely, M. (2016b). Disability studies after the ontological turn: A return to the material world and material bodies without a return to essentialism. Disability and Society, 31(7), 863–883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Garoian, C. R. (2013). Prosthetic pedagogy of art: Embodied research and practice. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  16. Gerschick, T., & Miller, A. (1995). Coming to terms: Masculinity and physical disability. In D. Sabo & D. F. Gordon (Eds.), Men’s health and illness: Gender, power, and the body. Thousand Oaks, USA: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  17. Gill, M. (2015). Already doing it: Intellectual disability and sexual agency. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  18. Goggin, G. (2017). Formatting disability in contemporary variety TV: Experiments with masculinity in The Last Leg. In C. Loeser, V. Crowley, & B. Pini (Eds.), Disability and masculinities. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  19. Goodley, D., Runswick-Cole, K., & Liddiard, K. (2016). The dishuman child. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 37(5), 770–784.Google Scholar
  20. Guldin, A. (2000). Self-claiming sexuality: Mobility impaired people and American culture. Sexuality and Disability, 18(4), 233–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hickey-Moody, A. (2009). Unimaginable bodies: Intellectual disability, performance and becomings. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.Google Scholar
  22. Hickey-Moody, A. (2015). Carbon fibre masculinity. Angelaki: Journal of the Theoretical Humanities, 20(1), 139–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kirby, D. (Director). (1997). Sick: The Life and Death of Bob Flanagan, Supermasochist [Documentary Film]. USA: Lions Gate Films.Google Scholar
  24. Kumari Campbell, F. (2009). Contours of ableism: The production of disability and abledness. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  25. Kvigne, K., Kirkevold, M., Martinsen, R., & Bronken, B. A. (2013). Masculinity and strokes: The challenges presented to younger men by chronic illness. Journal of Gender Studies, 23(2), 197–210.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2013.790797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. La Bruce, B., & Castro, R. (1996). Hustler White. France: Star Productions.Google Scholar
  27. Liddiard, K. (2012). (S)exploring disability: Intimacies, sexualities and disabilities (Doctoral dissertation). University of Warwick.Google Scholar
  28. Liddidard, K. (2014). ‘I never felt like she was just doing it for the money’: Disabled men’s intimate (gendered) realities of purchasing sexual pleasure for intimacy. Sexualities, 17(7), 837–855.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460714531272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Loeser, C., Crowley, V., & Pini, B. (2017). Disability and masculinities: Corporeality, pedagogy and the critique of otherness. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McRuer, R. (2006). Crip theory: Cultural signs of queerness and disability. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  31. McRuer, R. (2018). Crip times: Disability, globalization, and resistance. New York, USA: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Negri, A. (2008). Subversive Spinoza. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Nishida, A. (2017). Relating through differences: Disability, affective relationality, and the U.S. public healthcare assemblage. Subjectivity, 10(1), 89–103.  https://doi.org/10.1057/s41286-016-0018-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Peers, D., Brittain, M., & McRuer, R. (2012). Crip excess, art, and politics: A conversation with Robert McRuer. Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies, 34(3–4), 148–155.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10714413.2012.687284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Phillips, S. (Director). (2012) [Documentary Television Programme]. In B. TV (Producer), The Undateables. UK: Channel 4 Television Corporation.Google Scholar
  36. Pitchford-Hyde, J. (2016). Bare strength: Representing veterans of the desert wars in US media. Media, Culture and Society, 39(1), 45–61.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443716672299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Roman, L. (2009). Go gigure! Public pedagogies, invisible impairments and the performative paradoxes of visibility as veracity. The International Journal of Inclusive Education, 13(7), 677-698.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13603110903041920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rosenfelt, K., Baden-Powell, S., & Owen, A. (Producers)., & Sharrock, T. (Director). (2016). Me Before You [Motion Picture]. UK and USA: New Line Cinema.Google Scholar
  39. Sedgwick, E. K. (1985). Between men: English literature and male homosocial desire. New York, USA: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Shakespeare, T. (2000). Disabled  sexuality: Toward  rights  and  recognition. Sexuality and Disability, 18(3), 159–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Shildrick, M. (2014). “Why should our bodies end at the skin?”: Embodiment, boundaries, and somatechnics. Hypatia, 30(1), 13–29.  https://doi.org/10.1111/hypa.12114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Shildrick, M., & Steinberg, D. L. (2015). Estranged bodies: Shifting paradigms and the biomedical imaginary. Body and Society, 21(3), 3–19.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034x15586242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Stephens, L., Ruddick, S., & Mckeever, P. (2014). Disability and Deleuze: An exploration of becoming and embodiment in children’s everyday environments. Body and Society, 21(2), 194–220.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034x14541155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sullivan, N., & Murray, S. (2009). Somatechnics: Queering the technologisation of bodies. Farnham, UK: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
  45. Trevisan, F. (2017). Disability rights advocacy online. New York, USA: Routledge.Google Scholar
  46. Valente, J. M., & Boldt, G. M. (2015). The rhizome of the deaf child. Qualitative Inquiry, 21(6), 562–574.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800415581885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Weber, J. C. (2018). Becoming deaf in the posthuman era: Posthumanism, arts-based research and deaf education (Doctoral dissertation). University of Regina.Google Scholar
  48. Wilson, N., Parmenter, T. R., Stancliffe, R. J., & Shuttleworth, R. P. (2013). From diminished men to conditionally masculine: Sexuality and Australian men and adolescent boys with intellectual disability. Culture, Health and Sexuality: An International Journal for Research, Intervention and Care, 15(6), 738–751.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2013.780262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Media and CommunicationRoyal Melbourne Institute of TechnologyMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations