The Impact of Triple Bottom Dispersal of Actions on Integrated Reporting: A Critical Perspective

  • Adriana Schiopoiu Burlea
Part of the CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance book series (CSEG)


Integrated reporting (IR) is considered in literature as a practice that brings many benefits to organizations. In this regard, the paper provides some background information on the triple bottom dispersal of actions as core element of Integrated Reporting. The triple bottom dispersal of actions is a theory explaining the source of the problems and the crisis at an individual, organizational, national and international level. The aim of the work is to apply the integrated reporting to explain how organizations use the triple bottom dispersal of actions in order to reduce the amount of pressure caused by the increasing number of relevant information that needs to be disclosed. Accordingly, the chapter presents a critical analysis of the relationship between principles of Integrated Reporting and Triple bottom dispersal of actions and concludes with a set of reflections on how IR diminishes the triple bottom dispersal of actions.


  1. Alvesson, M., & Deetz, S. (2000). Doing critical management research. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boiral, O. (2013). Sustainability reports as simulacra? A counter-account of A and A+ GRI reports. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 26(7), 1036–1071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown, J., & Dillard, J. (2014). Integrated reporting: On the need for broadening out and opening up. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27(7), 1120–1156. Scholar
  4. Burlea Schiopoiu, A. (2010). Ethics of information in distributed business environments. In M. Pankowska (Ed.), Infonomics for distributed business and decision-making environments: Creating information system ecology (pp. 301–315). Hershey, PA: IGI-Global.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burlea Schiopoiu, A. (2015, May 12–13). The impact of dispersal of responsibilities on organisational behaviour. In Workshop on research advances in organizational behavior and human resources management (pp. 19–22). Université Paris Dauphine, DRM – Management & Organisation.Google Scholar
  6. Burlea Schiopoiu, A., & Idowu, O. S. (2016). The independence of the managers: An ethical dilemma. International Journal of Social Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 4(2), 152–171. Scholar
  7. Burlea Schiopoiu, A., & Remme, J. (2017). The dangers of dispersal of responsibilities. Amfiteatru Economic, 19(45), 464–476.Google Scholar
  8. Busco, C., Frigo, M. L., Riccaboni, A., & Quattrone, P. (Eds.). (2013). Integrated reporting: Concepts and cases that redefine corporate accountability. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  9. Cooper, D. J., & Morgan, W. (2013). Meeting the evolving corporate reporting needs of government and society: Arguments for a deliberative approach to accounting rule making. Accounting and Business Research, 43(4), 418–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Del Baldo, M. (2015). Is it time for integrated reporting in small and medium-sized enterprises? Reflections on an Italian experience. In S. O. Idowu, C. S. Frederiksen, A. Y. Mermod, & M. E. J. Nielsen (Eds.), Corporate social responsibility and governance: Theory and practice (pp. 183–209). Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  11. Dembinski, P. H., Lager, C., Cornford, A., & Bonvin, J.-M. (Eds.). (2006). Enron and world finance a case study in ethics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  12. Eccles, R. G., & Krzus, M. P. (2010). One report: Integrated reporting for a sustainable strategy. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  13. Ferrell, O. C., & Ferrell, L. (2010). The responsibility and accountability of CEOs: The last interview with ken lay. Journal of Business Ethics, 100, 209–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Flower, J. (2015, March). The international integrated reporting council: A story of failure. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 27, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Frias-Aceituno, J. V., Rodríguez-Ariza, L., & García-Sánchez, I. M. (2014). Explanatory factors of integrated sustainability and financial reporting. Business Strategy and the Environment, 23, 56–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Global Reporting Initiative - GRI. (2015). Second analysis paper sustainability and reporting trends in 2025. Accessed June 15, 2016, from
  17. Global Reporting Initiative - GRI. (2016). The next era of corporate disclosure: Digital, responsible, interactive. Accessed October 15, 2017, from
  18. Global Reporting Initiative - GRI. (2017a). Accessed March 2, 2017, from
  19. Global Reporting Initiative - GRI. (2017b). Reporting principles and standards disclosure. Accessed June 1, 2017, from
  20. Hess, D. (2014). The future of sustainability reporting as a regulatory mechanism. In D. R. Cahoy & J. E. Colburn (Eds.), Law and the transition to business sustainability (pp. 125–139). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  21. International Integrated Reporting Council - IIRC. (2013). The international IR framework. London: IIRC.Google Scholar
  22. King, A. A., & Lenox, M. J. (2000). Industry self-regulation without sanctions: The chemical industry’s RC program. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 698–716.Google Scholar
  23. KPMG International. (2013). The KPMG survey of corporate responsibility reporting 2013. Amsterdam: KPMG International.Google Scholar
  24. Leach, M., Scoones, I., & Stirling, A. (2010). Dynamic sustainabilities: Technology, environment. In Social Justice. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  25. MacDonald, B. S., & Hughes, E. J. (2009). Separating fools from their money: A history of American financial scandals (2nd ed.). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Mény, Y., & Rhodes, M. (1997). Illicit governance: Corruption, scandal and fraud. In M. Rhodes, P. Heywood, & V. Wright (Eds.), Developments in west European politics. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  27. Milne, M. J., & Gray, R. (2013). W(h)ither ecology? The triple bottom line, the global reporting initiative, and corporate sustainability reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(1), 13–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rost, K., & Osterloh, M. (2010). Opening the black box of upper echelons: Drivers of poor information processing during the financial crisis. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(3), 212–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ruiz-Lozano, M., & Tirado-Valencia, O. (2016). Do industrial companies respond to the guiding principles of the integrated reporting framework? A preliminary study on the first companies joined to the initiative. Revista de Contabilidad – Spanish Accounting Review, 19(2), 252–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sasson, R. (2012). The amazing cotes of Lao Tzu. Accessed March 15, 2017, from
  31. Soh, D., Leung, P., & Leong, S. (2015). The development of integrated reporting and the role of the accounting and auditing profession: Social audit regulation (pp. 33–57). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  32. Thomson, I. (2015, March). But does sustainability need capitalism or an integrated report a commentary on the international integrated reporting council: A story of failure by flower. Journal of Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 27, 18–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tschopp, D., & Huefner, R. J. (2015). Comparing the evolution of CSR reporting to that of financial reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(3), 565–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Volkswagen. (2014). The Volkswagen Sustainability Report 2014. Accessed March 22, 2016, from
  35. Wong, R., & Millington, A. (2014). Corporate social disclosures: A user perspective on assurance. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27(5), 863–887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adriana Schiopoiu Burlea
    • 1
  1. 1.University of CraiovaCraiovaRomania

Personalised recommendations