Early Adopters of Integrated Reporting: The Practical Evidence from Warsaw Stock Exchange Companies

  • Maria AluchnaEmail author
  • Maria Roszkowska-Menkes
Part of the CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance book series (CSEG)


Integrated reporting (IR) belongs to one of the most dynamically developing themes in the literature on CSR and sustainability management. It is perceived as an essential move forward from the traditional short-term reporting focused on financial performance towards a long-term, future-oriented holistic disclosure framework. Integrated reporting offers also a material and relevant information on company strategy and operation providing data on how their balance financial and sustainability goals. Delivering a complete picture of company financial results as well as its impact on society and environment integrated reporting gives the opportunity to make business decision and evaluate firm performance on the case of a number of various criteria.

In this chapter we address the practice of integrated reporting. We offer the case study analysis of five Polish listed companies who are the only firms quoted on the Warsaw Stock Exchange to currently adopt integrated reporting approach in their disclosure policy. We identify their organizational and sectorial characteristics, disclosure dynamics and evolution as well as the practice of integrated reporting. More specifically, using the IIRC framework we analyze the size, the scope, standards and the quality of non-financial information provided by our sample companies. Our goal is to identify challenges and success factors of integrated reporting process.


  1. Adams, C. A. (2015). The international integrated reporting council: A call to action. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 27, 23–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams, S., & Simnett, R. (2011). Integrated reporting: An opportunity for Australia’s not-for-profit sector. Australian Accounting Review, 21(3), 292–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ballou, B., Heitger, D., & Landes, C. (2006). The future of corporate sustainability reporting: A rapidly growing assurance opportunity. Journal of Accountancy, 22(3), 65–74.Google Scholar
  4. Ballou, B., Casey, R., Grenier, J. H., & Heitger, D. L. (2012). Exploring the strategic integration of sustainability initiatives: Opportunities for accounting research. Accounting Horizons, 26(2), 265–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beattie, V., & Smith, S. J. (2013). Value creation and business models: Refocusing the intellectual capital debate. The British Accounting Review, 45(4), 243–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown, J., & Dillard, J. (2014). Integrated reporting: On the need for broadening out and opening up. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27(7), 1120–1156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Caron, M., & Turcotte, M. (2009). Path dependence and path creation: Framing the non-financial information market for a sustainable trajectory. Accounting Auditing and Accountability Journal, 22(2), 272–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clayton, A. F., Rogerson, J. M., & Rampedi, I. (2015). Integrated reporting vs. sustainability reporting for corporate responsibility in South Africa. Bulletin of Geography Socio-economic Series, 29, 7–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Demartini, P., & Paolini, P. (2013). Managing sustainability through the IC practice lens. Conference paper, International Forum on Knowledge Asset Dynamics, 12-14.07.2013, Zagreb, Croatia.Google Scholar
  10. Dragu, I.-M., & Tiron-Tudor, A. (2013). The integrated reporting initiative from an institutional perspective: Emergent factors. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 92, 275–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dragu, I.-M., & Tiron-Tudor, A. (2014). Research agenda on integrated reporting: New emergent theory and practice. Procedia Economics and Finance, 15, 221–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eccles, R., & Krzus, M. (2010). One report: Integrated reporting for a sustainable strategy. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  13. Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2011). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance (Working paper). Harvard University.Google Scholar
  14. Flower, J. (2015). The international integrated reporting council: A story of failure. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 27, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Freeman, R. E. (1999). Divergent stakeholder theory. The Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 233–236.Google Scholar
  16. Frias-Aceituno, J. V., Rodriguez-Ariza, L., & Garcia-Sanchez, I. M. (2014). Explanatory factors of integrated sustainability and financial reporting. Business Strategy and the Environment, 23, 56–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Geels, F. (2011). The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1, 24–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grupa Azoty. (2013). Raport zintegrowany 2013 [Integrated report 2013]. Retrieved from
  19. Grupa Azoty. (2014). Grupa Azoty Integrated Report 2014. Accessed May 5, 2017, from
  20. Grupa Azoty. (2015). Grupa Azoty Integrated Report 2015. Accessed May 5, 2017, from
  21. Higgins, C., Stubbs, W., & Love, T. (2014). Walking the talk(s): Organisational narratives of integrated reporting. Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27(7), 1090–1119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. IIRC. (2013). The international <IR> framework. London: International Integrated Reporting Council.Google Scholar
  23. IIRC. (2014). Assurance on <IR>: An exploration of issues. London: International Integrated Reporting Council.Google Scholar
  24. IIRC, Black Sun. (2015). The integrated reporting journey: The inside story. London: IIRC, Black Sun.Google Scholar
  25. KGHM. (2014). Integrated Report – KGHM Polska Miedź.SA.2014. Accessed May 5, 2017, from
  26. KGHM. (2015). KGHM – Integrated Report – KGHM Polska Miedź.SA.2015. Accessed May 5, 2017, from
  27. Lodhia, S. (2015). Exploring the transition to integrated reporting through a practice lens: An Australian customer owned bank perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 129(3), 585–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. LOTOS. (2014). Raport zintegrowany 2014 [Integrated report 2014]. Retrieved from
  29. LOTOS. (2015a). LOTOS Integrated Annual Report 2014. Accessed May 5, 2017, from
  30. LOTOS. (2015b). LOTOS Integrated Report 2015. Accessed May 5, 2017, from
  31. ORLEN. (2015). ORLEN Group 2015 Integrated Report. Accessed May 5, 2017, from
  32. Perrini, F., Pogutz, S., & Tencani, A. (2006). Developing corporate social responsibility: A European perspective. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  33. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011, January-February). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89, 62–77.Google Scholar
  34. Stubbs, W., & Higgins, C. (2014). Integrated reporting and internal mechanisms of change. Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27(7), 1068–1089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. TAURON. (2015). 2015 Integrated Reporting. Accessed May 9, 2017, from
  36. Thorne, L., Mahoney, L., & Manetti, G. (2014). Motivations for issuing standalone CSR reports: A survey of Canadian firms. Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27(4), 686–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Villiers, C., Rinaldi, L., & Unerman, J. (2014). Integrated reporting: Insights, gaps and an agenda for future research. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27(7), 1042–1067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zicari, A. (2014). Can one report be reached? The challenge of integrating different perspectives on corporate performance. In R. Tench, W. Sun, & B. Jones (Eds.), Communicating corporate social responsibility: Perspectives and practice [Critical Studies on Corporate Responsibility, Governance and Sustainability, Vol. 6] (pp. 201–216). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Warsaw School of EconomicsWarszawaPoland

Personalised recommendations