Advertisement

An Ontology for Sharing Touristic Information

  • Carmen Fernández
  • Alberto Fernández
  • Holger Billhardt
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10767)

Abstract

E-Tourism applications require reliable means for sharing and reusing information and the possibility to add intelligence and inferred knowledge. In this paper, we focus on developing an ontology or common vocabulary for the tourism domain and, in particular, to represent resources from Croatia. We evaluate some of the most popular ontology development methodologies for this case. As a result of this assessment we present a proposal for a methodology that combines activities from both traditional and simplified methods.

Keywords

Ontologies Knowledge sharing Semantic search engines Semantic technologies Touristic information E-Tourism 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Work partially supported by the Autonomous Region of Madrid (grant “MOSI-AGIL-CM” (S2013/ICE-3019) co-funded by EU Structural Funds FSE and FEDER), project “SURF” (TIN2015-65515-C4-4-R (MINECO/FEDER)) funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, and through the Excellence Research Group GES2ME (Ref. 30VCPIGI05) co-funded by URJC and Santander Bank.

References

  1. 1.
    Bekiaris, E.: Factsheet ICT for transport and the environment center for research and technology Hellas/Hellenic institute of transport. Technical report, Certh/HIT (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ehrig, M.: Ontology Alignment: Bridging the Semantic Gap (Semantic Web and Beyond). Springer, Secaucus (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-36501-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fernandez-Lopez, M., Gomez-Perez, A., Juristo, N.: Methontology: from ontological art towards ontological engineering. In: Proceedings of the AAAI 1997 Spring Symposium, pp. 33–40, March 1997Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Flgge, M.: Satine: semantic-based interoperability infrastructure for the tourism industry. Technical report (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    HTW Group: Semantic web methodologies and tools for intra-European sustainable tourism. Technical report (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Horrocks, I.: An example owl ontology. Technical report (2003)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jouis, C., Bourdaillet, J.: Representation of atypical entities in ontologies. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2008, 26 May–1 June 2008, Marrakech, Morocco (2008)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Noy, N.F., Mcguinness, D.L.: Ontology development 101: a guide to creating your first ontology. Technical report (2001)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Prantner, K.: Ontour: the ontology. Technical report (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sure, Y., Staab, S., Studer, R., Gmbh, O.: On-to-knowledge methodology (OTKM). In: Staab, S., Studer, R. (eds.) Handbook on Ontologies. International Handbooks on Information Systems, pp. 117–132. Springer (2003).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24750-0_6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Uschold, M., Gruninger, M.: Ontologies: principles, methods and applications. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 11, 93–136 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CETINIAUniversity Rey Juan CarlosMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations