Advertisement

A Multi-agent Approach for Composing Negotiation Items in a Reverse Logistic Virtual Market

  • Adriana Giret
  • Adrian Martinez
  • Vicente Botti
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10767)

Abstract

In this work a reverse production process is conceived as a service-based manufacturing network (ecosystem), in which the manufacturing companies “play” in the ecosystem by means of market services. One complex problem in a reverse logistic virtual market is the efficient composition and decomposition of the negotiation items. A negotiation item is defined as an item subject to be recycled: used products/scraps/wastes, a sub-part of a used product/scrap/waste, or the materials that are contained in the used product/scrap/waste. In this work we present a Multi-agent approach in order to compose the last two types of negotiation items from an orchestration of negotiation processes among the different stakeholders of the reverse logistic process (i.e. collecting points, recycling plants, disassembly plants, secondary material markets). In this way a call for buying, for example 10 tons of steel, can be handle in the virtual market as a complex process of buying and selling used products/scraps/wastes, or their sub-parts, in order to decompose and pre-process them (by recycling and/or disassembly plants) for extracting the steel contained in those items.

Notes

Acknowledgement

This work is supported by research project TIN2015-65515-C4-1-R from the Spanish government.

References

  1. 1.
    Ahi, P., Searcy, C.: A comparative literature analysis of definitions for green and sustainable supply chain management. J. Clean. Prod. 52, 329–341 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Castelfranchi, C., Lespérance, Y. (eds.): ATAL 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1986. Springer, Heidelberg (2001).  https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44631-1CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ebinger, F., Goldbach, M., Schneidewind, U.: Greening supply chains: a competence-based perspective. In: Sarkis, J. (ed.) Greening the Supply Chain, pp. 251–269. Springer, London (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-299-3_14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fahimnia, B., Sarkis, J., Davarzani, H.: Green supply chain management: a review and bibliometric analysis. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 162, 101–114 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Giret, A., Salido, M.A.: A multi-agent approach to implement a reverse production virtual market in green supply chains. In: Lödding, H., Riedel, R., Thoben, K.-D., von Cieminski, G., Kiritsis, D. (eds.) APMS 2017. IAICT, vol. 514, pp. 399–407. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66926-7_46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Giret, A., Garcia, E., Botti, V.: An engineering framework for service-oriented intelligent manufacturing systems. Comput. Ind. 81, 116–127 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Giret, A., Trentesaux, D., Prabhu, V.: Sustainability in manufacturing operations scheduling: a state of the art review. J. Manuf. Syst. 37(Part 1), 126–140 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Giret, A., Trentesaux, D., Salido, M.A., Garcia, E., Adam, E.: A holonic multi-agent methodology to design sustainable intelligent manufacturing control systems. J. Clean. Prod. 167, 1370–1386 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Golinska, P., Fertsch, M., Gómez, J.M., Oleskow, J.: The concept of closed-loop supply chain integration through agents-based system. In: Gómez, J.M., Sonnenschein, M., Müller, M., Welsch, H., Rautenstrauch, C. (eds.) Information Technologies in Environmental Engineering. Environmental Science and Engineering (Environmental Engineering), pp. 189–202. Springer, Heidelber (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71335-7_20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Greco, G., Guzzo, A.: Coalition formation with logic-based agents. In: Criado Pacheco, N., Carrascosa, C., Osman, N., Julián Inglada, V. (eds.) EUMAS/AT -2016. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10207, pp. 455–469. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59294-7_37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hsieh, F.S.: Scheduling sustainable supply chains based on multi-agent systems and workflow models. In: 2015 10th International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Knowledge Engineering (ISKE), pp. 252–259, November 2015Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    International Trade Administration: How does Commerce define Sustainable Manufacturing? US Department of Commerce (2007)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mishra, N., Kumar, V., Chan, F.T.S.: A multi-agent architecture for reverse logistics in a green supply chain. Int. J. Prod. Res. 50(9), 2396–2406 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sarkis, J.: A strategic decision framework for green supply chain management. J. Clean. Prod. 11(4), 397–409 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sinha, A., Couderc, P.: Using OWL ontologies for selective waste sorting and recycling. In: OWLED. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 849 (2012)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Trentesaux, D., Giret, A.: Go-green manufacturing holons: a step towards sustainable manufacturing operations control. Manuf. Lett. 5, 29–33 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Daniel, V., Guide, R.: OR forum—the evolution of closed-loop supply chain research. Oper. Res. 57(1), 10–18 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Winkler, H.: Closed-loop production systems—a sustainable supply chain approach. CIRP J. Manuf. Sci. Technol. 4(3), 243–246 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dpto. Sistemas Informáticos y ComputaciónUniversitat Politècnica de ValènciaValenciaSpain

Personalised recommendations