Advertisement

Conclusion

  • Imran Awan
  • Keith Spiller
  • Andrew Whiting
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Risk, Crime and Society book series (PSRCS)

Abstract

This chapter offers concluding comments on the main issues that have informed the book as well as those that have emerged from it. We first offer an overview of key themes raised in the previous chapters before discussing the emerging critical voice toward Prevent in UK Higher Education. We then argue for the need for greater transparency, specifically in relation to the encroachment of counter-extremism within education and the effects it has, and also on a broader level with regard to the evidence and thought that underpin the government’s entire approach. We draw the book to a close by offering our final thoughts and reflections on what the formal expansion of counter-extremism means to us as university lecturers.

Keywords

Reflections Transparency Contest Freedom of information 

References

  1. Arendt, H. 1961. Between Past and Future. New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar
  2. Ball, S. J. 2012. “Performativity, Commodification and Commitment: An I-Spy Guide to the Neoliberal University”, British Journal of Educational Studies, 60(1): 17–28.Google Scholar
  3. Ball, K., Canhoto, A., Daniel, E., Dibb, S., Meadows, M. and Spiller, K. 2015. The Private Security State?: Surveillance, consumer Data and the War on Terror. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.Google Scholar
  4. Beck, U. 2002. “The terrorist threat: World risk society revisited”, Theory, culture & society, 19(4): 39–55.Google Scholar
  5. Commission for Countering Extremism. 2018. “Press release: Commission for Countering Extremism launches evidence drive”, gov.uk, available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/commission-for-countering-extremism-launches-evidence-drive
  6. Foucault, M. 2007. Security, territory, population. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  7. Fricker, M. 2007. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Gandy, O. H. 2012. Coming to Terms with Chance: Engaging Rational Discrimination and Cumulative Disadvantage. London: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
  9. Guardian. 2016. “Anti-Radicalisation Strategy Lacks Evidence Base in Science.” Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/sep/29/anti-radicalisation-strategy-lacks-evidence-base-in-science
  10. Grierson, J. 2018. “Choice of new UK anti-extremism chief criticised as ‘alarming’”, The Guardian, available at: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/jan/24/leading-muslim-campaigner-sara-khan-head-anti-extremism-drive
  11. Ford, K. 2017. “Developing a peace perspective on counter-extremist education”, Peace Review, 29(2): 144–152.Google Scholar
  12. Galtung, J. 1969. “Violence, peace and peace research”, Journal of Peace Research, 6(3), pp. 167–191.Google Scholar
  13. Hillyard, P. 1993. Suspect Community: People’s Experiences of the Prevention of Terrorism Acts in Britain. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  14. HM Government. 2018. “Counter-terrorism strategy (CONTEST) 2018”. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/counter-terrorism-strategy-contest-2018
  15. Home Office. 2018a. “Individuals referred to and supported through the Prevent Programme, April 2016 to March 2017”. Available at https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/694002/individuals-referred-supported-prevent-programme-apr2016-mar2017.pdf
  16. Home Office. 2018b. “Press release: New figures show improved referrals to Prevent and a rise in far-right concerns”, Gov.uk, available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new-figures-show-improved-referrals-to-prevent-and-a-rise-in-far-right-concerns
  17. Knudsen, R. A. (2018). Measuring radicalisation: risk assessment conceptualisations and practice in England and Wales. Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression, 1–18.Google Scholar
  18. Lloyd, M., and C. Dean. 2015. “The Development of Structured Guidelines for Assessing Risk in Extremist Offenders”, The Journal of Threat Assessment and Management, 2(1): 40–52.Google Scholar
  19. McGhee, D. 2010. Security, citizenship and human rights: shared values in uncertain times. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  20. O’Donnell, A. 2017. “Pedagogical injustice and counter-terrorist education”, Education, citizenship and social justice, 12(2): 177–193.Google Scholar
  21. O’Donnell, A. 2018. “Contagious ideas: vulnerability, epistemic injustice and counter-terrorism in education”, Educational Philosophy and Theory, 50(10): 981–997.Google Scholar
  22. Said, E. 1995. Orientalism. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  23. Spiller, K., Awan, I. and Whiting, A. 2018. “‘What does terrorism look like?’: university lecturers’ interpretations of their Prevent duties and tackling extremism in UK universities”, Critical Studies on Terrorism, 11(1): 130–150.Google Scholar
  24. Universities UK. 2017. “Higher Education in numbers”. Available at: https://www.universitiesuk.ac.uk/facts-and-stats/Pages/higher-education-data.aspx

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Imran Awan
    • 1
  • Keith Spiller
    • 2
  • Andrew Whiting
    • 2
  1. 1.Centre for Applied CriminologyBirmingham City UniversityBirminghamUK
  2. 2.Birmingham City UniversityBirminghamUK

Personalised recommendations