Advertisement

Investigating the Counter-Terrorism and Security Act in Higher Education

  • Imran Awan
  • Keith Spiller
  • Andrew Whiting
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Risk, Crime and Society book series (PSRCS)

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the Counter-Terrorism and Security Act (CTSA) and provides original empirical findings examining university lecturer perceptions of the new public duty within the CTSA. Emphasis is placed on the role of monitoring carried out by individuals as part of their job description—university lecturers monitoring their charges for indications of radicalisation or extremism. The chapter reviews the roles of university lecturers as an example of how public sector workers must perform the role of the security worker. As our findings demonstrate, there are tensions and contradictions felt by those mandated; for instance, a fear of not knowing when or how to report or even a no sense of defensive reporting—where due to the ambiguity in which the role of these duties are set, actors feel they must report all, for fear of repercussions. Equally, there are clear instances of resistance to how these newfound roles have been implemented and the challenges they instil to the freedoms and expectations that university lecturers hold dear.

Keywords

Empirical findings University lecturers Deputisation Resistance Control workers 

References

  1. Allen, C. 2010. Islamophobia. London: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
  2. Awan, I. 2012. “‘I’m a Muslim Not an Extremist:’ How the Prevent Strategy Has Constructed a ‘Suspect’ Community.” Politics & Policy 40 (6): 1158–1185.Google Scholar
  3. Ball, S. J. 2012. “Performativity, Commodification and Commitment: An I-Spy Guide to the Neoliberal University.” British Journal of Educational Studies 60 (1): 17–28.Google Scholar
  4. Baltodano, M. 2012. “Neoliberalism and the Demise of Public Education: The Corporatization of Schools of Education. International.” Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 25 (4): 487–507.Google Scholar
  5. Bausch, A. W., and T. Zeitzoff. 2015. “Citizen Information, Electoral Incentives, and Provision of Counter-Terrorism: An Experimental Approach.” Political Behavior 37 (3): 723–748.Google Scholar
  6. Caplan, J. 2011. “The Administration of Gender Identity in Nazi Germany.” History Workshop Journal 72: 171–180.Google Scholar
  7. Choudhury, T., and H. Fenwick 2011. “The Impact of Counter-Terrorism Measures on Muslim Communities.” Equality and Human Rights Commission Research Report 72. Accessed 20 June 2016. http://www.equalityhumanrights.com/uploaded_files/research/counter-terrorism_research_report_72.pdf
  8. Deleuze, G. 1992. “Postscript on the Societies of Control.” October 59, 3–7.Google Scholar
  9. Ericson, R. V., and K. D. Haggerty. 1997. Policing the Risk Society. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
  10. Espinoza, J. 2015. “Oxford and Cambridge Debating Societies Escape Ban on Extremism.” The Telegraph, Accessed 16 March 2015. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/universityeducation/student-life/11471654/Oxford-and-Cambridge-debating-societies-escape-ban-on-extremism.html
  11. Favarel-Garrigues, G., T. Godefroy, and P. Lascoumes. 2011. “Reluctant Partners? Banks in the Fight against Money Laundering and Terrorism Financing in France.” Security Dialogue 42 (2): 179–196.Google Scholar
  12. Gandy, O. H. 2012. Coming to Terms with Chance: Engaging Rational Discrimination and Cumulative Disadvantage. London: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
  13. Gardella, T. M. 2006. “Beyond Terrorism: The Potential Chilling Effect on the Internet of Broad Law Enforcement Legislation.” John’s L Reviews 80: 655.Google Scholar
  14. Goold, B., I. Loader, and A. Thumala. 2010. “Consuming Security? Tools for a Sociology of Security Consumption.” Theoretical Criminology 14 (3): 3–30. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480609354533.
  15. Guardian. 2015. “Mohammed Emwazi’s University Suspends All ‘Sensitive’ Events.” The Guardian, Accessed 27 February 2015. https://www.theguardian.com/education/2015/feb/27/mohammed-emwazi-university-westminster-refuses-to-cancel-preacher-talk-islamic-society
  16. Guardian. 2016. “Anti-Radicalisation Strategy Lacks Evidence Base in Science.” The Guardian. Accessed 29 September 2016. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/sep/29/anti-radicalisation-strategy-lacks-evidence-base-in-science
  17. Heath-Kelly, C. and Strausz, E. 2018. Counterterrorism in the NHS: Evaluating Prevent Duty Safeguarding. Available at https://www.docdroid.net/boB68fG/counter-terrorism-in-the-nhs.pdf
  18. Heath-Kelly, C., C. Baker-Beall, and L. Jarvis. 2015. “Editors’ Introduction: Neoliberalism And/As Terror.” Critical Studies on Terrorism 8 (1): 1–14.Google Scholar
  19. Hickman, J., L. Thomas, S. Silvestri, and H. Nickels, 2011. “Suspect Communities: Counter-Terrorism Policy, the Press and the Impact on Irish and Muslim Communities in Britain.” Accessed 9 January 2017. http://www.statewatch.org/news/2011/jul/uk-london-met-suspect-communitiesfindings.pdf.
  20. Hoijtink, M. 2014. “Capitalizing on Emergence: The ‘New’ Civil Security Market in Europe.” SecurityDialogue 45 (5): 458–475.Google Scholar
  21. Home Office. 2014. Request a Check. Accessed 20 August 2016 https://eforms.homeoffice.gov.uk/outreach/righttowork.ofml
  22. House of Lords/House of Commons Joint Committee on Human Rights. 2015. “Legislative Scrutiny:Counter-Terrorism and Security Bill.” Fifth Report of Session 2014–2015, Accessed 20 August 2016. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/jt201415/jtselect/jtrights/86/86.pdf
  23. Huysmans, J. 2011. “What’s in an Act? On Security Speech Acts and Little Security Nothings.” Security Dialogue 42 (4/5): 371–383.Google Scholar
  24. Independent. 2016. “New Counter-Extremism Strategy Could Make Fight Even Harder.” MPs warn. Accessed July 21 2016. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/counter-extremism-prevent-strategy-could-make-fight-even-harder-a7149351.html
  25. Kyriacou, C., R. Szczepek, B. Beatrice, F. Said, and I. Davies. 2017. “British Muslim University Students’ Perceptions of Prevent and Its Impact on Their Sense of Identity.” Education, Citizenship and Social Justice 12 (2): 97–110.Google Scholar
  26. Loader, I., and N. Walker. 2010. Civilising Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Lukianoff, G. 2014. Freedom from Speech. New York: Encounter Books.Google Scholar
  28. May, T. 2015. Home Secretary: We must work together to defeat terrorism. Available at https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/home-secretary-we-must-work-together-to-defeat-terrorism
  29. McGovern, M., and A. Tobin 2010. “Countering Terror or Counter-Productive: Comparing Irish and British Muslim Experiences of Counter-Insurgency” Law and Policy, Report of a Symposium held in Cultúrlann McAdam Ó Fiaich, Falls Road, Belfast. 23–24 June 2009.Google Scholar
  30. Milliken, S. 1999. “The Study of Discourse in International Relations: A Critique of Research and Methods.” European Journal of International Relations 5 (2): 225–254.Google Scholar
  31. Moosavi, L. 2013. “Islamophobia in the Representations of Islam and Muslims by the British Government between 2001 and 2007.” Turkish Journal of Sociology 27 (3): 33–368.Google Scholar
  32. Mountz, A., A. Bonds, B. Mansfield, J. Loyd, J. Hyndman, M. Walton-Roberts, and W. Curran. 2015. “For Slow Scholarship: A Feminist Politics of Resistance through Collective Action in the Neoliberal University.” ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies 14 (4): 1235–1259.Google Scholar
  33. Mueller, J., and M. G. Stewart. 2011. Terror, Security, and Money: Balancing the Risks, Benefits, and Costs of Homeland Security. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Mythen, G., and Walklate, S. 2006. Beyond The Risk Society: Critical Reflections On Risk And Human Security: Critical Reflections on Risk and Human Security. London: McGraw-Hill Education.Google Scholar
  35. Mythen, G., S. Walklate, and F. Khan. 2009. “‘I’m a Muslim, but I’m Not a Terrorist’: Victimization, Risky Identities and the Performance of Safety.” The British Journal Of Criminology 49: 736–754.Google Scholar
  36. Palfreyman, D. 2007. “Is Academic Freedom under Threat in UK and US Higher Education?” Education and the Law 19 (1): 19–40.Google Scholar
  37. Power, M. 2004. The Risk Management of Everything: Rethinking the Politics of Uncertainty. London: Demos.Google Scholar
  38. Pruzan, P. 2016. Research Methodology: The Aims, Practices and Ethics of Science. New York: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
  39. Qurashi, F. 2017. “Just Get on with It: Implementing the Prevent Duty in Higher Education and the Role of Academic Expertise.” Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, First Online.Google Scholar
  40. Radice, H. 2013. “How We Got Here: UK Higher Education under Neoliberalism”. ACME: An International. Journal for Critical Geographies 12 (2): 407–418.Google Scholar
  41. Rose, N. 2000. “Government and Control.” British Journal of Criminology 40 (2): 321–339.Google Scholar
  42. Royed, T. J. 1996. “Testing the Mandate Model in Britain and the United States: Evidence from the Reagan and Thatcher Eras.” British Journal of Political Science 26 (01): 45–80.Google Scholar
  43. Scott, J. C. 2013. Two Cheers for Anarchism: Six Easy Pieces on Autonomy, Dignity, and Meaningfuln Work and Play. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Spalek, B. 2010. “Community Policing, Trust, and Muslim Communities in Relation to New Terrorism.” Politics & Policy 38 (4): 789–815.Google Scholar
  45. White, A. 2011. “The New Political Economy of Private Security.” Theoretical Criminology 16 (1): 85–101.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Imran Awan
    • 1
  • Keith Spiller
    • 2
  • Andrew Whiting
    • 2
  1. 1.Centre for Applied CriminologyBirmingham City UniversityBirminghamUK
  2. 2.Birmingham City UniversityBirminghamUK

Personalised recommendations