Advertisement

Contesting Terms: Radicalisation and Extremism

  • Imran Awan
  • Keith Spiller
  • Andrew Whiting
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Risk, Crime and Society book series (PSRCS)

Abstract

The challenge of extremism in recent decades to Western democracies and the resurgence of ‘extremist’ and ‘radical’ movements have led to growing concerns among academics, the public, and politicians (Eatwell and Goodwin, The new extremism in 21st century Britain. Routledge, London, 2010). While some, like Hussain (The Islamist. Penguin, London, 2007: 278), describe extremist rhetoric as the ‘preamble to terrorism’, for others the precise nature and extent of any association between concepts such as ‘extremism’, ‘violent extremism’, and ‘radicalisation’ remain less clear (Davies, Educating against extremism. Trentham Books, Stoke on Trent, 2008). The UK government has sought to define such terms (HM Government, Prevent Strategy. Available at: http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/publications/counter-terrorism/prevent/prevent-strategy/prevent-strategy-review?view=Binary, 2011). However, a major problem with such terms is that they are value-laden. They are meaningful, and those meanings shift over time and place. Definitions shape how people interact in particular contexts, particularly at the levels of the personal, the group, and the social, and how they are dealt with (Hadley, J Soc Philos 40(3): 363–378, 2009; Hopkins and Kahani-Hopkins, Br J Soc Psychol 48: 99–113, 2009). Pantazis and Pemberton (Br J Criminol 49(5): 646–666, 2009) suggest, for example, that official political discourses and legislative measures in the context of the post-9/11 ‘war on terror’ have led to the construction of the UK’s Muslims as the ‘suspect community’. This chapter will focus on definitions around extremism and radicalisation and argue that the ambiguity of meanings and associations creates difficulties in how government shapes counter-terrorism policy. In particular, the wider empirical evidence we have gathered will be used in order to discuss the complexities surrounding these concepts and terms. Other extreme ideologies can also be identified, including animal rights extremism and anti-capitalist extremism. Each form of activism labelled ‘extremism’ is unique: it involves different individuals, groups, beliefs, motivations, values, and aspirations. Beyond this, extremism speaks to questions of ‘community cohesion’.

Keywords

Extremism Radicalisation Education Terrorism British Values 

References

  1. Awan, I. 2012. “‘I’m a Muslim not an Extremist:’ How the Prevent Strategy has constructed a ‘Suspect’ Community”, Politics & Policy, 40 (6): 1158–1185.Google Scholar
  2. Awan, I and Blakemore, B. 2013. Extremism, Counter-Terrorism and Policing. London: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
  3. Briggs, R., Fieschi, C., and Lownsbrough, H. 2006. Bringing it home: Community-based approaches to counter-terrorism. London: Demos.Google Scholar
  4. Bleich, E. 2010. “Faith and State. British policy responses to ‘Islamist’ extremism”. In The New Extremism in 21st Century Britain, edited by R. Eatwell and M.J. Goodwin. London: Routledge: 68–84.Google Scholar
  5. Cameron, D. 2011. “PM’s Speech at Munich Conference”. Number 10 Downing Street. Available at: http://www.number10.gov.uk/news/speeches-and-transcripts/2011/02/pms-speechatmunich-security-conference-60293
  6. Campbell, C. and Connolly, I. 2008. “A Model for the “War Against Terrorism”? Military Intervention in Northern Ireland and the 1970 Falls Curfew”, Journal of Law and Society, 33 (3): 341–375.Google Scholar
  7. Cantle Report. 2001. Community Cohesion: A Report of the Independent Review Team. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  8. Chakraborti, N. and Garland, J. 2009. Hate Crime: Impact, Causes and Responses. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  9. Davies, L. 2008. Educating Against Extremism. Stoke on Trent: Trentham Books.Google Scholar
  10. Department for Work and Education. 2014. “Guidance on Promoting British Values in Schools”. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/guidanceonpromotingbritish-values-in-schools-published
  11. Eatwell, R. 2006. “Community Cohesion and Cumulative Extremism in Contemporary Britain”, The Political Quarterly, 77(2): 204–216.Google Scholar
  12. Eatwell, R. and Goodwin, M.J. (eds.) 2010. The New Extremism in 21st Century Britain. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Fanshawe, S. and Sriskandarajah, D. 2010. You Can’t Put Me in a Box: Super-Diversity and the End of Identity Politics in Britain. London: Institute for Public Policy Research.Google Scholar
  14. Githens-Mazer and Lambert, R. 2010. “Islamophobia and Anti Muslim Hate Crimes: a London case study”, European Muslim Research Centre. Available at: http://centres.exeter.ac.uk/emrc/publications/IAMHC_revised_11Feb11.pdf
  15. Grayling, A.C. 2009. Liberty in the Age of Terror: A Defence of Civil Liberties and Enlightenment Values. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  16. Hadley, J. 2009. “Animal Rights and the Terrorism Question”, Journal of Social Philosophy, 40 (3): 363–378.Google Scholar
  17. Hickman, J., Thomas, L., Silvestri, S., Nickels, H., 2011. “Suspect Communities: Counter-terrorism policy, the press and the impact on Irish and Muslim communities in Britain”. Available at: http://www.statewatch.org/news/2011/jul/uk-london-met-suspect-communities-findings.pdf
  18. Hillyard, P. 1993. Suspect Community: People’s Experiences of the Prevention of Terrorism Acts in Britain. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  19. Home Office. 2004. Animal Welfare and Human Rights: Protecting People from Animal Rights Extremists. London: Home Office Communications Directorate.Google Scholar
  20. Home Office. 2011. “Proscribed terror groups or organisations”. Available at: http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/publications/counter-terrorism/proscribed-terror-groups
  21. HM Government. 2015. “Prevent Duty Guidance: For Higher Education Institutions in England and Wales”. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/445916/Prevent_Duty_Guidance_For_Higher_Education__England__Wales_.pdf
  22. Hopkins, N. and Kahani-Hopkins, V. 2009. “Reconceptualizing ‘extremism’ and ‘moderation’: From categories of analysis to categories of practiced in the construction of collective identity”, British Journal of Social Psychology, 48: 99–113.Google Scholar
  23. Hussain, E. 2007. The Islamist. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  24. Lambert, R. 2011. “Neo Conservative Ideology Trumps Academic Research and Practitioner experience Responding to Prevent 2011”. Muslim Council of Britain. Available at: http://www.mcb.org.uk/comm_details.php?heading_id=121&com_id=2
  25. Loza, W. 2007. “The Psychology of Extremism and Terrorism: A Middle-Eastern perspective”, Aggression and Violent Behaviour, 12: 141–155.Google Scholar
  26. Miah, S. 2015. Muslims, Schooling and the Question of Self-Segregation. UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  27. Pantazis, C. and Pemberton, S. 2009. “From the ‘Old’ to the ‘New’ Suspect Community: Examining the Impacts of Recent UK Counter-Terrorist legislation”, British Journal of Criminology, 49(5): 646–666.Google Scholar
  28. Prus, R. 2005. “Terrorism, tyranny, and religious extremism as collective activity: Beyond the deviant, psychological and power mystiques”, American Sociologist, 36: 47–74.Google Scholar
  29. Sageman, M. 2008. Leaderless jihad: Terror networks in the twenty first century. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  30. Schmidt, C., Joffe´, G., & Davar, E. 2005. “The Psychology of Political Extremism”, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 18: 151–172.Google Scholar
  31. Silke, A. 2005. “Fire of Iolaus”, in Bjorg, T. (ed.) The Root Causes of Terrorism: Myths, reality and ways forward, New York: Routledge: 242–248.Google Scholar
  32. Spalek, B. 2010. “Community Policing, Trust, and Muslim Communities in Relation to New Terrorism”, Politics & Policy, 38(4): 789–815.Google Scholar
  33. Spalek, B. and Lambert, R. 2008. “Muslim Communities, Counter-Terrorism and De-Radicalisation: A Reflective Approach to Engagement”, International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice. 36(4): 257–270.Google Scholar
  34. Spalek, B., El Awa, S. and McDonald, L. 2008. “Police-Muslim Engagement and Partnerships for the Purposes of Counter-Terrorism: An Examination”, Arts and Humanities Research Council. Available at: http://www.religionandsociety.org.uk/uploads/docs/2009_11/1258555474_Spalek_Summary_Report_2008.pdf
  35. Spiller, K., Awan, I., and Whiting, A. 2017. “‘What does terrorism look like?’: University lecturers’ interpretations of their Prevent duties and tackling extremism in UK Universities, Critical Studies on Terrorism”. Available at: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17539153.2017.1396954
  36. Sunstein, C. 2009. Going to Extremes: How Like Minds Unite and Divide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Tajfel, H. and Billig, M. 1974. “Familiarity and categorization in intergroup behaviour”, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10: 159–170.Google Scholar
  38. The Guardian. 2006. “Blair backs MI5 terror warning”. Available at: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2006/nov/10/terrorism.politics
  39. Tufyal, C. 2007. “The Role of Muslim Identity Politics in Radicalisation (a study in progress) (April)”, Department for Communities and Local Government: London Communities and Local Government. Available at: http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/communities/pdf/452628.pdf
  40. Wakefield, A. and Fleming, J. 2009. The SAGE dictionary of policing. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  41. Wiktorowicz, Q. 2005. Radical Islam Rising: Muslim Extremism in the West. Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Imran Awan
    • 1
  • Keith Spiller
    • 2
  • Andrew Whiting
    • 2
  1. 1.Centre for Applied CriminologyBirmingham City UniversityBirminghamUK
  2. 2.Birmingham City UniversityBirminghamUK

Personalised recommendations