Advertisement

An Adaptive Primary User Emulation Attack Detection Mechanism for Cognitive Radio Networks

  • Qi Dong
  • Yu Chen
  • Xiaohua Li
  • Kai Zeng
  • Roger Zimmermann
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering book series (LNICST, volume 254)

Abstract

The proliferation of advanced information technologies (IT), especially the wide spread of Internet of Things (IoTs) makes wireless spectrum a precious resource. Cognitive radio network (CRN) has been recognized as the key to achieve efficient utility of communication bands. Because of the great difficulty, high complexity and regulations in dynamic spectrum access (DSA), it is very challenging to protect CRNs from malicious attackers or selfish abusers. Primary user emulation (PUE) attacks is one type of easy-to-launch but hard-to-detect attacks in CRNs that malicious entities mimic PU signals in order to either occupy spectrum resource selfishly or conduct Denial of Service (DoS) attacks. Inspired by the physical features widely used as the fingerprint of variant electronic devices, an adaptive and realistic PUE attack detection technique is proposed in this paper. It leverages the PU transmission features that attackers are not able to mimic. In this work, the transmission power is selected as one of the hard-to-mimic features due to the intrinsic discrepancy between PUs and attackers, while considering constraints in real implementations. Our experimental results verified the effectiveness and correctness of the proposed mechanism.

Keywords

Cognitive radio networks (CRNs) Primary user emulation (PUE) attacks Detection Hard-to-mimic features 

Notes

Acknowledgement

Q. Dong, Y. Chen and X. Li are supported by the NSF via grant CNS-1443885. K. Zeng is partially supported by the NSF under grant No. CNS-1502584 and CNS-1464487.

References

  1. 1.
    Federal Communications Commission: Facilitating opportunities for flexible, efficient, and reliable spectrum use employing spectrum agile radio technologies. Et et docket (03–108) edn, December 2003Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Federal Communications Commission: Enabling innovative small cell use in 3.5 GHz band NPRM & order, December 2012Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Adelantado, F., Verikoukis, C.: Detection of malicious users in cognitive radio ad hoc networks: a non-parametric statistical approach. Ad Hoc Netw. 11, 2367–2380 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Baker, M.A.: Introductory remarks: panel on the future of radio technology. Technical report, Federal Communications Commission (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brik, V., Banerjee, S., Gruteser, M., Oh, S.: Wireless device identification with radiometric signatures. ACM (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen, R., Park, J.M., Reed, J.H.: Defense against primary user emulation attacks in cognitive radio networks. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 26(1), 25–37 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chen, Z., Cooklev, T., Chen, C., Pomalaza-Ráez, C.: Modeling primary user emulation attacks and defenses in cognitive radio networks. In: 2009 IEEE 28th International Performance Computing and Communications Conference (IPCCC), pp. 208–215. IEEE (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Das, D., Das, S.: Primary user emulation attack in cognitive radio networks: a survey. IRACST-Int. J. Comput. Netw. Wirel. Commun. 3(3), 312–318 (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dong, Q., Yang, Z., Chen, Y., Li, X., Zeng, K.: Anomaly detection in cognitive radio networks exploiting singular spectrum analysis. In: Rak, J., Bay, J., Kotenko, I., Popyack, L., Skormin, V., Szczypiorski, K. (eds.) MMM-ACNS 2017. LNCS, vol. 10446, pp. 247–259. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65127-9_20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dong, Q., Yang, Z., Chen, Y., Li, X., Zeng, K.: Exploration of singular spectrum analysis for online anomaly detection in CRNs. EAI Endorsed Trans. Secur. Saf. 4(12), e3 (2017)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Feng, X., Zhang, J., Zhang, Q.: Database-assisted multi-AP network on TV white spaces: architecture, spectrum allocation and AP discovery. In: 2011 IEEE Symposium on New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks (DySPAN), pp. 265–276. IEEE (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Goldsmith, A.: Wireless Communications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Huang, L., Xie, L., Yu, H., Wang, W., Yao, Y.: Anti-PUE attack based on joint position verification in cognitive radio networks, vol. 2. IEEE (2010)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kawalec, A., Owczarek, R.: Specific emitter identification using intrapulse data. In: Radar Conference, 2004. EURAD. First European, pp. 249–252. IEEE (2004)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Langley, L.E.: Specific emitter identification (SEI) and classical parameter fusion technology. In: WESCON/1993. Conference Record, pp. 377–381. IEEE (1993). 0780399706Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Liu, Y., Ning, P., Dai, H.: Authenticating primary users’ signals in cognitive radio networks via integrated cryptographic and wireless link signatures, pp. 286–301. IEEE (2010)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Marinho, J., Granjal, J., Monteiro, E.: A survey on security attacks and countermeasures with primary user detection in cognitive radio networks. EURASIP J. Inf. Secur. 2015(1), 4 (2015). ISSN 1687-417XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Murty, R., Chandra, R., Moscibroda, T., Bahl, P.V.: Senseless: a database-driven white spaces network. IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 11, 189–203 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Paisana, F., Marchetti, N., DaSilva, L.A.: Radar, TV and cellular bands: which spectrum access techniques for which bands? IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 16(3), 1193–1220 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Peng, K., Zeng, F., Zeng, Q.: A new method to detect primary user emulation attacks in cognitive radio networks. In: International Conference on Computer Science and Service System (CSSS 2014) (2014)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pesko, M., Javornik, T., Kosir, A., Stular, M., Mohorcic, M.: Radio environment maps: the survey of construction methods. TIIS 8(11), 3789–3809 (2014)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rasmussen, K.B., Capkun, S.: Implications of radio fingerprinting on the security of sensor networks. In: Third International Conference on Security and Privacy in Communications Networks and the Workshops, SecureComm 2007, pp. 331–340. IEEE (2007)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Roos, T., Myllymaki, P., Tirri, H.: A statistical modeling approach to location estimation. IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 99(1), 59–69 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yilmaz, H.B., Tugcu, T., Alagoz, F., Bayhan, S.: Radio environment map as enabler for practical cognitive radio networks. IEEE Commun. Mag. 51(12), 162–169 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zhang, X., Jia, Q., Guo, L.: Secure and optimized unauthorized secondary user detection in dynamic spectrum access. In: IEEE Conference on Communications and Network Security (CNS), pp. 1–9, October 2017Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Qi Dong
    • 1
  • Yu Chen
    • 1
  • Xiaohua Li
    • 1
  • Kai Zeng
    • 2
  • Roger Zimmermann
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Electrical and Computer EngineeringBinghamton UniversityBinghamtonUSA
  2. 2.Volgenau School of EngineeringGeorge Mason UniversityFairfaxUSA
  3. 3.School of ComputingNational University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations