Advertisement

The Difficulty of Predicting Behaviour

Why Existing Market Research Methods Aren’t Good Enough
  • Helena Rubinstein
Chapter

Abstract

Businesses want to change behaviour but conventional market research processes are often poor at predicting it. Predicting behaviour is hard and the intention–behaviour gap is significant. Conventional market research methods make it even harder because the data is often poor quality, data is confused with insight, data collection fails to focus on the factors that drive behaviour and a lot of research is done to confirm existing biases rather than to prove or refute behavioural hypotheses. Rubinstein discusses the barriers to gaining a deeper understanding of consumer behaviour and makes the case for better research tools and methods that apply the principles of behavioural science. In particular, she discusses the importance of having a good theoretical framework to allow researchers to find out what people really do, not what they say they do.

Keywords

Consumer behaviour Consumer insight Intention–behaviour gap Market research methods 

References

  1. Bagozzi, R. P. (2006). Explaining consumer behaviour and consumer action: From fragmentation to unity. Seoul Journal of Business, 12(2), 11–143.Google Scholar
  2. Castellion, G., & Markham, S. K. (2013). Perspective: New product failure rates: Influence of argumentum ad populum and self-interest. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(5), 976–979.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2012.01009.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Crawford, C. M. (1977). Marketing research and the new product failure rate. Journal of Marketing, 41(2), 51–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Janis, I. L. (1982). Groupthink: Psychological studies of policy decisions and fiascoes (6th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  5. Sheeran, P. (2002). Intention–behavior relations: A conceptual and empirical review. European Review of Social Psychology, 12(1), 1–36.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14792772143000003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. The Psychometrics Centre, Innovia Technology, & Edelman. (2016). Trust and Predictive Technologies 2016 Report. London.Google Scholar
  7. West, R. (2015). The P.R.I.M.E. theory of motivation as a possible foundation for the treatment of addiction. In Addiction treatment: Science and policy for the twenty-first century. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins Univeristy Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Helena Rubinstein
    • 1
  1. 1.Innovia Technology LtdCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations