Advertisement

bf-pd: Enabling Mediated Communication and Cooperation in Improvised Digital Orchestras

  • Luke DahlEmail author
  • Florent Berthaut
  • Antoine Nau
  • Patricia Plenacoste
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11265)

Abstract

Digital musical instruments enable new musical collaboration possibilities, extending those of acoustic ensembles. However, the use of these new possibilities remains constrained due to a lack of a common terminology and technical framework for implementing them. Bf-pd is a new software library built in the PureData (Pd) language which enables communication and cooperation between digital instruments. It is based on the BOEUF conceptual framework which consists of a classification of modes of collaboration used in collective music performance, and a set of components which affords them. Bf-pd can be integrated into any digital instrument built in Pd, and provides a “collaboration window” from which musicians can easily view each others’ activity and share control of instrument parameters and other musical data. We evaluate the implementation and design of bf-pd through workshops and a preliminary study and discuss its impact on collaboration within improvised ensembles of digital instruments.

Keywords

Digital orchestras Laptop orchestra Digital musical instruments Collaboration BOEUF bf-pd PureData 

References

  1. 1.
    Alexandraki, C., et al.: Towards the implementation of a generic platform for networked music performance: the diamouses approach. In: ICMC, pp. 251–258 (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Berthaut, F., Dahl, L.: BOEUF: a unified framework for modeling and designing digital orchestras. In: Kronland-Martinet, R., Aramaki, M., Ystad, S. (eds.) CMMR 2015. LNCS, vol. 9617, pp. 153–166. Springer, Cham (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46282-0_10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Berthaut, F., Jones, A.: Controllar: appropriation of visual feedback on control surfaces. In: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM on Interactive Surfaces and Spaces, ISS 2016, pp. 271–277. ACM, New York (2016)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Blaine, T., Fels, S.: Contexts of collaborative musical experiences. In: Proceedings of NIME 2003, Singapore, Singapore, pp. 129–134 (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bryan-Kinns, N., Hamilton, F.: Identifying mutual engagement. Behav. Inf. Technol. 31(2), 101–125 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Burns, C., Surges, G.: NRCI: software tools for laptop ensemble. In: ICMC (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cakmak, C., Camci, A., Forbes, A.: Networked virtual environments as collaborative music spaces. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression, volume 16 of 2220–4806, pp. 106–111. Queensland Conservatorium Griffith University, Brisbane (2016)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gresham-Lancaster, S.: The aesthetics and history of the hub: the effects of changing technology on network computer music. Leonardo Music J. 8, 39–44 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hattwick, I., Wanderley, M.M.: A dimension space for evaluating collaborative musical performance systems (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Malloch, J., Sinclair, S., Wanderley, M.M.: A network-based framework for collaborative development and performance of digital musical instruments. In: Kronland-Martinet, R., Ystad, S., Jensen, K. (eds.) CMMR 2007. LNCS, vol. 4969, pp. 401–425. Springer, Heidelberg (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85035-9_28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Malloch, J., Sinclair, S., Wanderley, M.M.: Libmapper: (a library for connecting things). In: CHI 2013 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 3087–3090. ACM (2013)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Merritt, T., Kow, W., Ng, C., McGee, K., Wyse, L.: Who makes what sound? Supporting real-time musical improvisations of electroacoustic ensembles. In: Proceedings of the 22nd Conference of the Computer-human Interaction Special Interest Group of Australia on Computer-Human Interaction, pp. 112–119. ACM (2010)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Moro, G., et al.: Making high-performance embedded instruments with Bela and pure data. In: International Conference on Live Interfaces (2016)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Place, T., Lossius, T.: Jamoma: a modular standard for structuring patches in max. In: Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference, pp. 143–146 (2006)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Weinberg, G.: Interconnected musical networks: toward a theoretical framework. Comput. Music J. 29(2), 23–39 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wyse, L., Mitani, N.: Bridges for networked musical ensembles. In: ICMC (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luke Dahl
    • 1
    Email author
  • Florent Berthaut
    • 2
  • Antoine Nau
    • 2
  • Patricia Plenacoste
    • 2
  1. 1.McIntire Department of Music, University of VirginiaCharlottesvilleUSA
  2. 2.Université de LilleLilleFrance

Personalised recommendations