Advertisement

Base Politics and the Hold-up Problem

  • Shinji KawanaEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Springer Polar Sciences book series (SPPS)

Abstract

In this chapter, we will consider the conditions under which local actors exercise political influence on their governments as part of base politics during peacetime in democratic states. A factor that destabilizes bases in democratic states is the “vulnerability” of host governments. Vulnerability is as a function of substitutability, urgency, and specificity. The greater the importance of a particular base for the government, the greater its vulnerability vis-à-vis local political actors, and the higher the risk that it will be “held up” by them. However, as the government knows the incentives for opportunism among these local actors, it will aim to integrate, institutionalize, and distribute the base transactions in order to avoid a hold-up.

Keywords

Vulnerability Substitutability Urgency Specificity Integration Institutionalization Distribution 

References

  1. Calder, K. E. 2007. Embattled garrisons: Comparative base politics and American globalism, 116–119. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Carroll, G. R. and D. J. Teece. 1999. Firms, markets, and hierarchies: The transaction cost economics perspectives. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Cooley, A. 2005. Logics of hierarchy: The organization of empires, states, and military occupations, 20–42. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Cooley, A. A. 2008. Base politics: Democratic change and the U.S. military overseas. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Friman, H. R. 1993. Side payments versus security cards: Domestic bargaining tactics in international economic negotiations. International Organization 47 (3): 387–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Goldmann, K. and G. Sjostedt. eds. 1979. Power, capabilities, interdependence: Problems in the study of international influence. London/Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  7. Johnson, C. 2004. The sorrows of empire: Militarism, secrecy, and the end of the Republic. New York: Metropolitan Books, Henry Holt.Google Scholar
  8. Kawase, M. 2013. Base maintenance policy and finances, 2–3. Tokyo: Nihon Keizai Hyoronsha (In Japanese).Google Scholar
  9. Keohane, R. O. and J. S. Nye. 2001. Power and interdependence. 3rd ed, 12. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  10. Knudsen, O. 1979. Multinational corporations and the small industrialized state: Some aspects of dependency and potential power. In Power, capabilities, interdependence: Problems in the study of international influence, ed. K. Goldmann and G. Sjostedt, 221–222. London/Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  11. Milgrom, P. and J. Roberts. 2003 Organizational economics, 44. Trans. Okuno, M. et al. Tokyo: NTT Publishing (In Japanese).Google Scholar
  12. Sandars, C. T. 2000. America’s overseas garrisons: The leasehold empire. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Simmel, G. 2016. Sociology: Inquiries into the construction of social forms (Part 1), 198–200. Trans. Inui, M. Tokyo: Hakusuisya (In Japanese).Google Scholar
  14. Stein, H. ed. 1963. American civil-military decisions: A book of case studies. Alabama: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
  15. Teece, D. J. 1980. Economics of scope and the scope of the enterprise. Journal of Economic Behavior Organization 1 (3): 223–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Vine, D. 2009. Island of shame: The secret history of the U.S. military base on Diego Garcia. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Williamson, O. E. 1975. Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications, 16–19. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  18. Yamamoto, Y. 1989. International Interdependence, 111. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press (In Japanese).Google Scholar
  19. Yeo, A. 2011. Activists, alliances, and anti-U.S. base protests. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Liberal Arts, Tokyo Institute of TechnologyTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations