Advertisement

Protecting Heritage Structures Against Liquefaction: Recent Developments

  • Amir TophelEmail author
  • G. V. Ramana
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation book series (ASTI)

Abstract

The occurrence of liquefaction of loose, saturated and cohesionless soils during major earthquakes is a reasonably common problem and has a more significant potential for destruction. Landmark research regarding the prevention of liquefaction using traditional techniques such as air injection, biogas generation, soil densification and other procedures are well documented. These techniques are energy consumptive and ecologically destructive. However, for protecting the heritage structures, a non-destructive method should be used to preserve the already existing structures. One of the recent research interests is using a novel technique called Microbially Induced Calcite Precipitation (MICP) to prevent liquefaction. This test is not only non-destructive but also green and has long-term effects overcoming all the limitations of the conventional practices. An attempt was made to compile the ongoing research for liquefaction resistance using MICP.

Keywords

Liquefaction Earthquake Densification Non-destructive MICP 

References

  1. 1.
    UNESCO Homepage. https://whc.unesco.org/en/about/. Last accessed 28 Apr 2018
  2. 2.
    Lo, R.C., Wang, Y.: Lessons learned from recent earthquakes—geoscience and geotechnical perspectives. Adv. Geotech. Earthq. Eng. Liq. Seism. Saf. Dams Monum. InTech, 1–43 (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Berardi, R., Margottini, C., Molin, D., Parisi, A.: Soil liquefaction: case histories in Italy. Tectonophysics 193(1–3), 141–164 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    K. Wakamatsu.: Liquefaction history, 416–1997, in Japan. In: 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, pp. 1–8 (1997)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Huang, Y., Yu, M.: Review of soil liquefaction characteristics during major earthquakes of the twenty-first century. Nat. Hazards 65(3), 2375–2384 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Idriss, I.M., Boulanger, R.W.: Soil liquefaction during earthquakes. Earthq. Eng. Res. Inst. 136(6), 755 (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hazarika, H., Hyodo, M., Yasuhara, K.: Investigation of tire chips sand mixtures as preventive measure against liquefaction. Gr. Improv. Geosynth. GSP 207, 338–345 (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    He, J., Chu, J., Ivanov, V.: Mitigation of liquefaction of saturated sand using biogas. Géotechnique 63(4), 267–275 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Seed, R.B., Cetin, K.O., Moss, R.E.S., Kammerer, A.M., Wu, J., Pestana, J.M., Riemer, M.F., Sancio, R.B., Bray, J.D., Kayen, R.E., Faris, A.: Recent advances in soil liquefaction engineering : a unified and consistent framework. In: Report no.EERC 2003-06, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, pp. 1–72 (2003)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Youd, T.L., Idriss, I.M.: Liquefaction resistance of soils: summary report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF workshops on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils. J. Geotech. Geoenvironmental Eng. 127(10), 817–833 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Okamura, M., Ishihara, M., Tamura, K.: Degree of saturation and liquefaction resistances of sand improved with sand compaction pile. J. Geol. Geoenviron. Eng. 132(2), 258–264 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kavazanjian, E., O’Donnell, S.T.: Mitigation of earthquake-induced liquefaction via microbial denitrification: a two-phase process. Ifcee GSP 256, 2286–2295 (2015)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    O’Donnell, S.T., Rittmann, B.E., Kavazanjian, E.: MIDP: liquefaction mitigation via microbial denitrification as a two-stage process. I: desaturation. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 143(12), 4017094 (2017)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    DeJong, J.T., Mortensen, B.M., Martinez, B.C., Nelson, D.C.: Bio-mediated soil improvement. Ecol. Eng. 36(2), 197–210 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Montoya, B., DeJong, J., Boulanger, R.: Dynamic response of liquefiable sand improved by microbial-induced calcite precipitation. Géotech. 470(4), 302–312 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    O’Donnell, S.T., Kavazanjian, E., Rittmann, B.E.: MIDP: liquefaction mitigation via microbial denitrification as a two-stage process. II: MICP. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 143(12), 4017095 (2017)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Simatupang, M., Okamura, M.: Liquefaction resistance of sand remediated with carbonate precipitation at different degrees of saturation during curing. Soils Found. 57(4), 619–631 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Xiao, P., Liu, H., Xiao, Y., Stuedlein, A.W., Evans, T.M.: Liquefaction resistance of bio-cemented calcareous sand. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 107, 9–19 (2018)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Indian Institute of Technology DelhiDelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations