Advertisement

Experimental Investigation of Several Different Types of Soil Erosion Protection Systems

  • Hossein Moayedi
  • Ramli Nazir
  • Loke Kok Foong
  • Mansour Mosallanezhad
  • Biswajeet Pradhan
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation book series (ASTI)

Abstract

Most unprotected slopes face stability problems due to erosion. Generally, an unstable slope issue arises when erosion begins on its surface. Several erosion protection methods provide a solution to protect the slope surface by dividing a large slope area into many small cells, hence increasing the stiffness of the soil surface. In this research, a total of 964 tests were performed on unconfined slopes and slopes with three types of confinement systems varying in three different sizes. The experiments were conducted based on various rainfall intensities, rainfall durations, and slope angles. Furthermore, the experimental results for the unconfined and confined slopes were compared to indicate the effectiveness of the soil confinement system. The confined slope showed significantly lower soil loss compared to the unconfined slope. Additionally, the results revealed that the triangular type was the most effective confinement system, as the lowest soil loss mass was recorded. In general, the introduced erosion protection system shows a promising way of preventing slope failure due to erosion at an early stage.

Keywords

Soil protection Erosion Pollution prevention Sediments Sustainability 

References

  1. 1.
    Haghighi, I., Chevalier, C., Duc, M., Guédon, S., Reiffsteck, P.: Improvement of hole erosion test and results on reference soils. J. Geotech. and Geoenviron. Eng. 139, 330–339 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pradhan, B., Chaudhari, A., Adinarayana, J., Buchroithner, M.F.: Soil erosion assessment and its correlation with landslide events using remote sensing data and GIS: a case study at Penang Island Malaysia. Environ. Monit. Assess. 184, 715–727 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Blaikie, P: The Political Economy of Soil Erosion in Developing Countries. Routledge, (2016)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nazir, R., Ghareh, S., Mosallanezhad, M., Moayedi, H.: The influence of rainfall intensity on soil loss mass from cellular confined slopes. Meas. 81, 13–25 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Posthumus, H., Deeks, L.K., Rickson, R.J., Quinton, J.N.: Costs and benefits of erosion control measures in the UK. Soil Use Manage. 31, 16–33 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nazir R., Moayedi, H.: Soil mass loss reduction during rainfalls by reinforcing the slopes with the surficial confinement: World academy of science, engineering and technology. International Journal of Environmental, Ecological, Geomatics, Earth Science and Engineering. 8(6), 331–334 (2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hossein Moayedi
    • 1
  • Ramli Nazir
    • 2
  • Loke Kok Foong
    • 2
  • Mansour Mosallanezhad
    • 3
  • Biswajeet Pradhan
    • 4
  1. 1.Centre of Tropical Geoengineering (Geotropik), School of Civil Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringUniversiti Teknologi MalaysiaJohorMalaysia
  2. 2.Faculty of Civil EngineeringCentre of Tropical Geoengineering, Universiti Teknologi MalaysiaJohor BahruMalaysia
  3. 3.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringShiraz UniversityShirazIran
  4. 4.Faculty of Engineering and IT, School of Systems, Management and LeadershipUniversity of Technology SydneyUltimoAustralia

Personalised recommendations