Advertisement

The Benefits and Impact of Digital Twins in Product Development Phase of PLM

  • Ilkka Donoghue
  • Lea Hannola
  • Jorma Papinniemi
  • Aki Mikkola
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 540)

Abstract

The concept of the Digital Twins offers opportunities for business-to-business (B2B) manufacturing companies to co-create and maintain Product-Service-Systems. This facilitates closer relationship with customers over the lifespan of the delivered solution. However, the definition of the Digital Twin is not yet established in the companies that took part in this research that forms the basis to understand the relationship between the Digital Twins and Product-Service-Systems.

The objective of this paper is to define the concepts of Digital Twin and real-time simulation, and increase understanding of the benefits and impacts that B2B companies face when applying real-time simulation, and understand where the transformation should start in Product Lifecycle Management. The case companies that participated in this research are mobile work machine manufactures, but the findings are applicable to other B2B manufacturing companies which have complex solution deliveries that are managed over the lifecycle.

Results of this study show that B2B manufacturing companies are using real-time simulation to create digital twins of their real-world solutions. The companies participating in the research project create functioning digital twins but managing them is tedious and not integrated to the Product Lifecycle Management operations. First, only applying this to product development is not enough, but the management must cover the entire lifecycle of the product from Beginning (BOL), Middle (MOL) and End-of-Lifecycle (EOL). Second, the need to rethink the approach to product development and management is a key for success. Otherwise, the result is a virtual representation of the real world that is impossible to maintain at industrial level.

Keywords

Digital twin Real-time simulation Product Lifecycle Management PLM Product-service system Digital Mock-Up 

References

  1. Mikkola, A., Hannola, L., Handroos, H., Rantanen, H., Ullako, K.: LUT Research Platform on Sustainable Product Processes Through Community-Based Real-Time Simulation. Lappeenranta University of Technology, Lappeenranta (2014)Google Scholar
  2. Bilello, P.A.: The Digital Twin has Landed, CIM Data (2017)Google Scholar
  3. Grieves, M.: Product Lifecycle Management: Driving the Next Generation of Lean Thinking. McGraw-Hill, New York (2006)Google Scholar
  4. Saaksvuori, A., Immonen, A.: Product Lifecycle Management. Springer, Berlin (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78172-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Siller, H., Estruch, A., Vila, C., Abellan, J., Romero, F.: Modeling workflow activities for collaborative process planning with product lifecycle management tools. J. Intell. Manuf. 19(6), 689–700 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Stark, J.: Product Lifecycle Management (Volume 3): The Executive Summary. Springer, Cham (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72236-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cedeño, J.M.V., Papinniemi, J., Hannola, L., Donoghue, I.: Developing smart services by internet of things in manufacturing business. LogForum 14(1), 59–71 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.17270/J.LOG.2018.268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Tukker, A., Tischner, U.: Product-services as a research field: past, present and future. J. Clean. Prod. 14(2006), 1552–1556 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Xin, Y., Ojanen, V., Huiskonen, J.: Empirical studies on product-service systems – a systematic literature review. Procedia CIRP 64, 399–404 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Garcia de Jalon, J., Bayo, E.: Kinematic and Dynamic Simulation of Multibody Systems: The Real Time Challenge. Springer, New York (1994).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2600-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hevner, A.: A three cycle view of design science research. Scand. J. Inf. Syst. 19(2), 87–92 (2007)Google Scholar
  12. Hevner, A., March, S., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design science research in information systems. Manag. Inf. Syst. Q. 28(1), 75–105 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Donoghue, I, Hannola, L., Papinniemi, J.: Product lifecycle management framework for business transformation. In: 24th International Conference on Production Research (2017) Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ilkka Donoghue
    • 1
  • Lea Hannola
    • 1
  • Jorma Papinniemi
    • 1
  • Aki Mikkola
    • 2
  1. 1.Industrial Engineering and ManagementLappeenranta University of TechnologyLappeenrantaFinland
  2. 2.Mechanical EngineeringLappeenranta University of TechnologyLappeenrantaFinland

Personalised recommendations