Advertisement

Sustainability of Cascading Product Lifecycles

The Need for Adaptive Management to End-of-Life Supply Chains
  • Matthias Kalverkamp
  • Alexandra Pehlken
  • Thorsten Wuest
  • Steven B. Young
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 540)

Abstract

Product lifecycles can contain several waste management steps after the production of a product. At each step, ‘end-of-life’ supply chains can separate, each emerging supply chain representing an intended lifecycle or an unintended, though not necessarily inferior lifecycle in terms of sustainability. This variety demonstrates the complexity arising at the end-of-life and indicates that not necessarily a single actor coordinates these supply chains. The cascade use methodology targets this complexity by identifying sustainable supply chains, possibly managed by alternative actors. This study applies the methodology to a novel case of vehicle reuse and conversion discussing its sustainability and implications for decision makers. The authors argue for more adaptive management approaches to address sustainability in product lifecycles more holistically.

Keywords

Cascade use Recycling Reuse Remanufacturing Product lifecycle management Closed-loop supply chains Open-loop supply chains 

Notes

Acknowledgements

MK and AP were financially supported by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Grant No: 01LN1310A).

References

  1. 1.
    EC: Circular Economy Strategy. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/circular-economy/index_en.htm. Accessed 31 May 2016
  2. 2.
    NPC: Circular economy promotion law of the People’s Republic of China: adopted at the 4th session of the standing committee of the 11th national people’s congress of the People’s Republic of China. Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress (NPC), China, August 2008Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ellen MacArthur Foundation: Towards the Circular Economy: An economic and business rationale for an accelerated transition. https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/publications/. Accessed 13 July 2016
  4. 4.
    European Commission: Closing the loop - An EU action plan for the Circular Economy. COM (2015). 614 final. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52015DC0614. Accessed 05 July 2016
  5. 5.
    Thierry, M., Salomon, M., van Nunen, J., van Wassenhove, L.: Strategic issues in product recovery management. Calif. Manag. Rev. 37(2), 114–135 (1995).  https://doi.org/10.2307/41165792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kalverkamp, M., Pehlken, A., Wuest, T.: Cascade use and the management of product lifecycles. Sustainability 9(9), 1540 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.3390/su9091540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tukker, A.: Product services for a resource-efficient and circular economy – a review. J. Clean. Prod. 97, 76–91 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Moreno, M., de Los Rios, C., Rowe, Z., Charnley, F.: A conceptual framework for circular design. Sustainability 8(9), 937 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.3390/su8090937CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Guide, V.D.R., van Wassenhove, L.N.: The evolution of closed-loop supply chain research. Oper. Res. 57(1), 10–18 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.1080.0628CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Majumder, P., Groenevelt, H.: Competition in remanufacturing. Prod. Oper. Manag. 10(2), 125–141 (2001).  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-5956.2001.tb00074.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Borsato, M.: Bridging the gap between product lifecycle management and sustainability in manufacturing through ontology building. Comput. Ind. 65(2), 258–269 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2013.11.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tibben-Lembke, R.S.: Life after death: reverse logistics and the product life cycle. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Log. Manag. 32(3), 223–244 (2002).  https://doi.org/10.1108/09600030210426548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Terzi, S., Bouras, A., Dutta, D., Garetti, M., Kiritsis, D.: Product lifecycle management - from its history to its new role. IJPLM 4(4), 360 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPLM.2010.036489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jun, H.-B., Kiritsis, D., Xirouchakis, P.: Research issues on closed-loop PLM. Comput. Ind. 58(8–9), 855–868 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2007.04.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Svensson, G.: The theoretical foundation of supply chain management. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Log. Manag. 32(9), 734–754 (2002).  https://doi.org/10.1108/09600030210452422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ziout, A., Azab, A., Atwan, M.: A holistic approach for decision on selection of end-of-life products recovery options. J. Clean. Prod. 65, 497–516 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.10.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hu, G., Bidanda, B.: Modeling sustainable product lifecycle decision support systems. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 122(1), 366–375 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.06.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Haberl, H., Geissler, S.: Cascade utilization of biomass: strategies for a more efficient use of a scarce resource. Ecol. Eng. 16, 111–121 (2000).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-8574(00)00059-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Guide, V.D.R., Wassenhove, L.N.: Closed-loop supply chains: an introduction to the feature issue (part 1). Prod. Oper. Manag. 15(3), 345–350 (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-5956.2006.tb00249.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Coffin, D.: Used vehicles are an important component of U.S. passenger-vehicle exports. USITC Executive Briefings on Trade, USITC, January 2015Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Coffin, D., Horowitz, J., Nesmith, D., Semanik, M.: Examining Barriers to Trade in Used Vehicles. Working Paper ID-044, USITC - Office of Industries, August 2016. https://www.usitc.gov/publications/332/used_vehicle_wp_id-44_final_web_0.pdf. Accessed 13 September 2017
  22. 22.
    Sander, K., Wagner, L., Sanden, J., Wilts, H.: Development of proposals, including legal instruments, to improve the data situation on the whereabouts of end-of-life vehicles. Umweltbundesamt, Dessau-Roßlau (2017)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kumar, S., Yamaoka, T.: System dynamics study of the Japanese automotive industry closed loop supply chain. J. Manufact. Technol. Manag. 18(2), 115–138 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1108/17410380710722854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zaun, T., Singer, J.: How Japan’s second-hand cars make their way to third world: Sophisticated market handles big used-vehicle surplus; way station in Dubai. Wall Street J. (2004). https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB107352145936011400
  25. 25.
    Kalverkamp, M., Raabe, T.: Automotive remanufacturing in the circular economy in Europe: marketing system challenges. J. Macromarketing 38(1), 112–130 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1177/0276146717739066CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Cascade Use Research GroupCarl von Ossietzky University of OldenburgOldenburgGermany
  2. 2.Industrial and Management Systems EngineeringWest Virginia UniversityMorgantownUSA
  3. 3.School of Environment, Enterprise and DevelopmentUniversity of WaterlooWaterlooCanada

Personalised recommendations