Advertisement

A Discussion on Current Issues for Semantic Interoperability in an Integrated Product Development Process

  • Athon Francisco Curi Staben de Moura Leite
  • Anderson Luis Szejka
  • Osiris Canciglieri Junior
  • Rafael Christiano Annunziato
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 540)

Abstract

Through past decade, the complexity of integrated product development process has been significantly increased, due to highly elaborated customer’s needs, market requirements and their multi-disciplinary nature. In this context, the meaning and formal structure of such information must be well managed since initial stages of product development, in order to avoid semantic heterogeneity and subsequent mistakes in interpretation. The aim of this paper is to understand the current issues related to this scenario, through the study of later works and research regarding Semantic Interoperability through ontologies in multiple domains, applicable in the field of Product Development and Manufacturing. Search material points out that a significant issue regards the input of information, since most of current models merely translate information from different sources, instead of understanding its nature and stablish a common standard to extract and structure it. Research has suggested that Knowledge Extraction models may be a viable path to filter and refine the quality of the input information, as means to improve the accuracy and effectiveness of new knowledge. This research structured its findings in a model that explores the issues of semantic interoperability through reference ontologies, to bring light to new research themes, validated through further research.

Keywords

Semantic interoperability Multiple domains Product development and manufacturing Formal models Reference ontology 

References

  1. 1.
    Chungoora, N., Canciglieri, O., Young, R.I.M.: Towards expressive ontology-based approaches to manufacturing knowledge representation and sharing. Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 23, 1059–1070 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Canciglieri Jr., O., Young, R.I.M.: Information sharing in multiviewpoint injection moulding design and manufacturing. Int. J. Prod. Res. 41(7), 1565–1586 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Anjum, N., et al.: Verification of knowledge shared across design and manufacture using a foundation ontology. Int. J. Prod. Res. 51, 6534–6552 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen, D., Doumeingts, G., Vernadat, F.: Architectures for enterprise integration and interoperability: past, present and future. Comput. Ind. 59, 647–659 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chungoora, N., Young, R.I.M.: Semantic reconciliation across design and manufacturing knowledge models: a logic-based approach. Appl. Ontol. 6, 295–315 (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Szejka, A. L., Canciglieri Jr., O., Loures, E.R., Panetto, H., Aubry, A.: Requirements interoperability method to support integrated product development. In: 45th Computers and Industrial Engineering, vol. 147, pp. 1–8 (2015)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Imran, M., Young, R.I.M.: The application of common logic based formal ontologies to assembly knowledge sharing. J. Intell. Manuf. 26, 139–158 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Song, W., Ming, X., Wang, P.: Collaborative product innovation network: status review, framework, and technology solutions. Concurr. Eng. 21, 55–64 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schmidt, D.C.: Model-Driven Engineering. IEEE Comput. 39(2), 25–31 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Strasunskas, D., Hakkarainen, S.E.: Domain model-driven software engineering: a method for discovery of dependency links. Inf. Softw. Technol. 54(11), 1239–1249 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Barbieri, G., Fantuzzi, C., Borsari, R.: A model-based design methodology for the development of mechatronic systems. Mechatronics (2014)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Liao, Y., Lezoche, M., Panetto, H., Boudjlida, N., Loures, E.R.: Semantic annotation for knowledge explicitation in a product lifecycle management context: a survey. Comput. Ind. 71, 24–34 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chungoora, N., Young, R.I., Gunendran, G., Palmer, C., Usman, Z., Anjum, N.A., CuttingDecelle, A.F., Harding, J.A., Case, K.: A model-driven ontology approach for manufacturing system interoperability and knowledge sharing. Comput. Ind. 64(4), 392–401 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Szejka, A.L., Júnior, O.C., Loures, E.R., Panetto, H., Aubry, A.: Proposal of a Model-Driven Ontology for Product Development Process Interoperability and Information Sharing. In: Harik, R., Rivest, L., Bernard, A., Eynard, B., Bouras, A. (eds.) PLM 2016. IAICT, vol. 492, pp. 158–168. Springer, Cham (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54660-5_15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chungoora, N., Young, R.I.M.: The configuration of design and manufacture knowledge models from a heavyweight ontological foundation. Int. J. Prod. Res. 49, 4701–4725 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pereira, J.A., Canciglieri Jr., O., Lazzaretti, A.E., Souza, P.M.: Application of inte grated product development model oriented to R&D projects of the Brazilian electricity sector. Adv. Mater. Res. 945–949, 401–409 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Stechert, C., Franke, H.J.: Managing requirements as the core of multi-disciplinary product development. CIRP J. Manufact. Sci. Technol. 1(3), 153–158 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Szejka, A.L., Aubry, A., Panetto, H., Junior, O.C., Loures, E.R.: Towards a Conceptual Framework for Requirements Interoperability in Complex Systems Engineering. In: Meersman, R., et al. (eds.) OTM 2014. LNCS, vol. 8842, pp. 229–240. Springer, Heidelberg (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45550-0_24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Haveman, S.P., Bonnema, G.M.: Requirements for high level models supporting design space exploration in model-based systems engineering. Proc. Comput. Sci. 16, 293–302 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nattermann, R., Reiner, A.: Approach for a data-management-system and a proceeding model for the development of adaptronic systems. In: International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition (ASME), pp. 1–10, Vancouver (2010)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Moneva, H., Hamberg, R. Punter, T.: A design framework for model-based development of complex systems. In: 32nd IEEE Real-Time Systems Symposium and 2nd Analytical Virtual Integration of Cyber-Physical Systems Workshop, pp. 1–8, Vienna, (2011)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chungoora, N., et al.: A model-driven ontology approach for manufacturing system interoperability and knowledge sharing. Comput. Ind. 64, 392–401 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rozenfeld, H., Forcellini, F.A., Amaral, D.C., Toledo, J.C., Silva, S.L., Alliprandini, D.H., Scalice, R.K.: Gestão de Desenvolvimento de Produtos: Uma Referência Para a Melhoria do Processo. Saraiva, São Paulo (2006)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Stechert, C., Franke, H.J.: Managing requirements as the core of multi-disciplinary product development. CIRP J. Manuf. Sci. Technol. 1(3), 153–158 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pereira, J.A., Canciglieri Jr., O.: Product development model oriented for the R&D projects of the Brazilian electricity sector. Appl. Mech. Mater. 518, 366–373 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    de Moura Leite, A.F.C.S.M., Canciglieri, M.B., Szejka, A.L.: Canciglieri Jr., O.: The reference view for semantic interoperability in Integrated Product Development Process: The conceptual structure for injecting thin walled plastic products. J. Ind. Inf. Integr. 7, 13–23 (2017)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Young, R.I.M., Gunendran, A.G., Cutting-Decelle, A.F., Gruninger, M.: Manufacturing knowledge sharing in PLM: a progression towards the use of heavy weight ontologies. Int. J. Product. Res. 45(7), 1505–1519 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kim, K.-Y., Manley, D.G., Yang, H.: Ontology-based assembly design and information sharing for collaborative product development. Comput. Des. 38, 1233–1250 (2006)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ramesh, B., Jarke, M.: Toward reference models for requirements traceability. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 27, 58–93 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Spanoudakis, G., Zisman, A., Pérez-Miñana, E., Krause, P.: Rule-based generation of requirements traceability relations. J. Syst. Softw. 72(2), 105–127 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Pohl, K.: The three Dimensions of Requirements Engineering: a framework and its applications. Inform. Syst. 19(3), 243–258 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Cleland-Huang, J., Chang, C.K., Sethi, G., Javvaji, K., Haijian, H., Jinchun, X.: Automating speculative queries through event-based requirements traceability. In: Proceedings of IEEE Joint International Conference on Requirements Engineering, pp. 289–296 (2002)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Industrial and Systems Engineering Graduate ProgramPontifical Catholic University of ParanaCuritibaBrazil
  2. 2.NHS Electronic SystemsCuritibaBrazil

Personalised recommendations