Advertisement

PLM and BIM Approach to Support Information Management in Nuclear Decommissioning: A Synthesis

  • Vincent Cheutet
  • Aicha Sekhari
  • Nathalie Corbeaux
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 540)

Abstract

Nuclear decommissioning is a huge disaster and cumbersome mechanism to handle, after critical analysis and rigorous review it is found that PLM and BIM approaches seem interesting in this field to support the business needs in terms of collaboration, information exchange and traceability all over the decommissioning process. This paper analyses the scientific and industrial literature to extract the requirements for the deployment of a mixed BIM-PLM approach in the nuclear decommissioning context.

Keywords

Information management PLM BIM Nuclear decommissioning 

References

  1. 1.
    Chou, I.H., Fan, C.F.: Developing integrated decommissioning information management system (IDIMS) of nuclear facilities. J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 43(5), 596–604 (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1080/18811248.2006.9711138MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    IAEA: Standard format and content for safety related decommissioning documents. International Atomic Energy Agency, Safety Reports Series No. 45 (2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Michal, V.: IAEA perspectives on preparation for decommissioning. In: International Symposium on Preparation for Decommissioning – PREDEC 2016, Lyon, France (2016)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Leclair, A.N., Lemire, D.S.: 26–Information management for nuclear decommissioning projects. In: Laraia, M. (Ed.) Woodhead Publishing Series in Energy, Nuclear Decommissioning, pp. 777–798. Woodhead Publishing (2012)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Iguchi, Y., Kanehira, Y., Tachibana, M., Johnsen, T.: Development of Decommissioning Engineering Support System (DEXUS) of the Fugen Nuclear Power Station. J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 41(3), 367–375 (2004).  https://doi.org/10.1080/18811248.2004.9715497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yanagihara, S., Sukegawa, T., Shiraishi, K.: Development of computer systems for planning and management of reactor decommissioning. J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 38(3), 193–202 (2001).  https://doi.org/10.1080/18811248.2001.9715021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Romero, D., Vernadat, F.: Enterprise information systems state of the art: past, present and future trends. Comput. Ind. 79, 3–13 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2016.03.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sudarsan, R., Fenves, S.J., Sriram, R.D., Wang, F.: A product information modeling framework for product lifecycle management. Comput. Aided Des. 37(13), 1399–1411 (2005).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2005.02.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ameri, F., Dutta, D.: Product lifecycle management needs, concepts and components. Product Lifecycle Management Development Consortium (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Latiffi, A.A., Mohd, S., Rakiman, U.S.: Potential Improvement of Building Information Modeling (BIM) implementation in Malaysian construction projects. In: Bouras, A., Eynard, B., Foufou, S., Thoben, K.-D. (eds.) PLM 2015. IAICT, vol. 467, pp. 149–158. Springer, Cham (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33111-9_14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Haron, A.T., Marshall-Ponting, A.J., Aouad, G.: Building information modelling in integrated practice. In: 2nd Construction Industry Research Achievement International Conference. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Eastman, C.M., Eastman, C., Teicholz, P., Sacks, R.: BIM Handbook: a guide to building information modeling for owners, managers, designers, engineers and contractors. Wiley, Hoboken (2011)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    NBS: NBS National BIM Report 2014 (2014). https://www.thenbs.com/knowledge/nbs-national-bim-report-2014
  14. 14.
    Jupp, J.R., Nepal, M.: BIM and PLM: comparing and learning from changes to professional practice across sectors. In: Fukuda, S., Bernard, A., Gurumoorthy, B., Bouras, A. (eds.) PLM 2014. IAICT, vol. 442, pp. 41–50. Springer, Heidelberg (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45937-9_5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jupp, J.R.: Incomplete BIM implementation: exploring challenges and the role of product lifecycle management functions. In: Bernard, A., Rivest, L., Dutta, D. (eds.) PLM 2013. IAICT, vol. 409, pp. 630–640. Springer, Heidelberg (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41501-2_62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    London, K., Singh, V., Taylor, C., Gu, N., Brankovic, L.: Building information modelling project decision support framework. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Conference Association of Researchers in Construction Management (ARCOM) (2008)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Aram, S., Eastman, C.: Integration of PLM solutions and BIM systems for the AEC industry. In: Proceedings of 30th International Symposium of Automation and Robotics in Construction and Mining, Montréal, pp. 1046–1055 (2013)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Walker, A.: Big benefits for nuclear sector by going digital Building Information Modelling (BIM) and Project Lifecycle Management are transforming the nuclear industry for lifecycle value and assurance (2016). http://www.infrastructure-intelligence.com/article/apr-2016/big-benefits-nuclear-sector-going-digital
  19. 19.
    Yalcinkaya, M., Singh, V.: Building Information Modeling (BIM) for facilities management – literature review and future needs. In: Fukuda, S., Bernard, A., Gurumoorthy, B., Bouras, A. (eds.) PLM 2014. IAICT, vol. 442, pp. 1–10. Springer, Heidelberg (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45937-9_1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tommila, T., Alanen, J.: Conceptual model for safety requirements specification and management in nuclear power plants. VTT-VTT Technol. 238, 120 (2015)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
  22. 22.
    Pottelberg, P., Tremblay, R.: The Turnover Process at Chalk River Laboratories from Operations to Decommissioning. In: PREDEC 2016 Conference, Lyon (France) (2016)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Calais, T., Rauber, J.C.: Control and maintenance of the Superphenix knowledge and its specific sodium skills through an innovative partnership between EDF and AREVA, PREDEC. In: 2016 Conference, Lyon (France) (2016)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    IAEA-TECDOC-1305: Safe and Effective Nuclear Power Plant Life Cycle Management towards Decommissioning, pp. 1–36 (2002)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cheutet, V., Sekhari, A., Corbeaux, N.: A PLM approach to support nuclear decommissioning process. In: DEM 2018 - Dismantling Challenges: Industrial Reality, Prospects and Feedback Experience, Avignon (France) (2018)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Boton, C., Rivest, L., Forgues, D., Jupp, J.: Comparing PLM and BIM from the product structure standpoint. In: Harik, R., Rivest, L., Bernard, A., Eynard, B., Bouras, A. (eds.) PLM 2016. IAICT, vol. 492, pp. 443–453. Springer, Cham (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54660-5_40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Akinade, O.O., et al.: BIM-based deconstruction tool: towards essential functionalities. Int. J. Sustain. Built Environ. 6(1), 260–271 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsbe.2017.01.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kraft, D., Francisco, W.: Establishing a governance framework to provide leadership to a new enterprise asset management program. In: Asset Management Conference (AM 2016), (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1049/cp.2016.1403

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vincent Cheutet
    • 1
  • Aicha Sekhari
    • 2
  • Nathalie Corbeaux
    • 3
  1. 1.University Lyon, INSA Lyon, DISP LaboratoryVilleurbanneFrance
  2. 2.University Lyon, Université Lumière Lyon 2, DISP LaboratoryBronFrance
  3. 3.EDF-DP2DLyonFrance

Personalised recommendations