Collective Agency-Promoting Leadership in Finnish Teacher Education

  • Päivi HökkäEmail author
  • Matti Rautiainen
  • Tiina Silander
  • Anneli Eteläpelto


Globally, there is a political and social consensus that teacher education is a key priority for the twenty-first century. However, studies have so far paid little attention to a crucial issue, namely, leadership in teacher education. This chapter contributes to discussion on transforming teacher education practices by focusing on leadership practices in a particular Finnish teacher education department. Adopting a subject-centred sociocultural approach, we elaborate the main challenges, insights, and lessons learned, as perceived by the four leaders of the department, in efforts to move towards more innovative and collaborative practices. We argue that teacher education leaders currently require competencies to support professional agency and to lead the identity work of their staff. In addition, leaders need the resources to build collective leadership practices while renegotiating their own professional identities. Overall, we highlight the importance of what we term collective agency-promoting leadership in developing teacher education practices.


  1. Bolden, R., Petrov, G., & Gosling, J. (2008). Tensions in higher education leadership: Towards a multi-level model of leadership practices. Higher Education Quarterly, 62(4), 358–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brennan, J., & MacRuairc, G. (2011). Taking it personally: examining patterns of emotional practice in leading primary schools in the Republic of Ireland. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 14(2), 129–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Buchanan, R. (2015). Teacher identity and agency in an era of accountability. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 21(6), 700–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chreim, S. (2015). The (non)distribution of leadership roles: Considering leadership practices and configurations. Human Relations, 68(4), 517–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Eteläpelto, A., Vähäsantanen, K., Hökkä, P., & Paloniemi, S. (2013). What is agency? Conceptualizing professional agency at work. Educational Research Review, 10, 45–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Eteläpelto, A., Vähäsantanen, K., Hökkä, P., & Paloniemi, S. (2014). Identity and Agency in Professional Learning. In S. Billett, C. Harteis, & H. Gruber (Eds.), International handbook on research in professional and practice-based learning (pp. 645–672). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  7. Goller, M., & Paloniemi, S. (Eds.). (2017). Agency at work. An agentic perspective on professional learning and development, Professional and practice-based learning series (Vol. 20). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  8. Gronn, P. (2002). Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(4), 423–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gronn, P. (2009). Leadership configurations. Leadership, 5(3), 381–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gronn, P. (2015). The view from inside leadership configurations. Human Relations, 68(4), 545–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hakanen, J., Bakker, A., & Schaufeli, W. (2006). Burnout and work engagement among teachers. Journal of School Psychology, 43(6), 495–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hastings, S. L. (2010). Triangulation. In N. J. Salkind (Ed.), Encyclopedia of research design (pp. 1538–1541). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Hökkä, P. (2012). Teacher educators amid conflicting demands: tensions between individual and organizational development, Jyväskylä studies in education, psychology and social research (Vol. 433). Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.Google Scholar
  14. Hökkä, P., & Eteläpelto, A. (2014). Seeking new perspectives on the development of teacher education. A study of the Finnish context. Journal of Teacher Education, 65(1), 39–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hökkä, P., & Vähäsantanen, K. (2014). Agency-centred coupling – A better way to manage an educational organization? International Journal of Leadership in Education. Theory and Practice, 17(2), 131–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hökkä, P., Vähäsantanen, K., & Mahlakaarto, S. (2017). Teacher educators’ collective professional agency and identity - transforming marginality to strength. Teaching and Teacher Education, 63, 36–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jäppinen, A.-K. (2014). Collaborative educational leadership: The emergence of human interactional sense-making process as a complex system. Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 11(2), 65–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Madalinska-Michalak, J., Niemi, H., & Chong, S. (Eds.). (2012). Research, policy and practice in teacher education in Europe, Teacher education policy in Europe network. Lodz: University of Lodz.Google Scholar
  19. Moos, L. (2005). How do schools bridge the gap between external demands for accountability and the need for internal trust. Journal of Educational Change, 6(4), 307–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Murray, J., & Harrison, J. (2008). Editorial. European Journal of Teacher Education, 31(2), 109–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Murray, J., Campbell, A., Hextall, I., Hulme, M., Jones, M., Mahony, P., Menter, I., Procter, R., & Wall, K. (2009). Research and teacher education in the UK: Building capacity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 944–950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Niemi, H. (2008). Research-based teacher education for teachers’ lifelong learning. Lifelong Learning in Europe, 13, 61–69.Google Scholar
  23. Niemi, H. (2012). The societal factors contributing to education and schooling in Finland. In H. Niemi, A. Toom, & A. Kallioniemi (Eds.), The miracle of education: The principles and practices of teaching and learning in Finnish schools (pp. 19–38). Rotterdam: Sense.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nikkola, T., Räihä, P., Moilanen, P., Rautiainen, M., & Saukkonen, S. (2008). Towards a deeper understanding of learning in teacher education. In C. Nygaard & C. Holtham (Eds.), Understanding learning-centred higher education (pp. 251–263). Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.Google Scholar
  25. Offermann, L. R., & Scuderi, N. F. (2007). Sharing leadership: Who, what, when and why. In B. Shamir, R. Pillai, M. C. Bligh, & M. Uhl-Bien (Eds.), Follower-centered perspectives on leadership (pp. 71–91). Greenwich: Information Age publishing.Google Scholar
  26. Pantic, N., & Florian, L. (2015). Developing teachers as agents of inclusion and social justice. Education Inquiry, 6(3), 333–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Peck, C., Gallucci, C., Sloan, T., & Lippincott, A. (2009). Organizational learning and program renewal in teacher education: A socio-cultural theory of learning, innovation and change. Educational Research Review, 4, 16–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. QS World University Rankings (2017). Accessed 1 Feb 2018.
  29. Rautiainen, M., Nikkola, T., Räihä, P., Saukkonen, S., & Moilanen, P. (2010). From disorder to new order: The complexity of creating new educational culture. In C. Nygaard, N. Courtney, & C. Holtham (Eds.), Teaching creativity – Creativity in teaching (pp. 189–202). Faringdon: Libri Publishing.Google Scholar
  30. Robinson, M., & McMillan, W. (2006). Who teaches the teachers? Identity, dis-course and policy in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 327–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Saldaña, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  32. Silander, T., & Välijärvi, J. (2013). The theory and practice of building pedagogical skill in Finnish teacher education. In Pisa, power and policy: The emergence of global educational governance. Oxford studies in comparative education, 23(1). United Kingdom: Symposium Books, 77–98.Google Scholar
  33. Spillane, J. P., & Healey, K. (2010). Conceptualizing school leadership and management from a distributed perspective. The Elementary School Journal, 111(2), 253–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tian, M., Risku, M., & Collin, K. (2015). A meta-analysis of distributed leadership from 2002 to 2013: Theory development, empirical evidence and future research focus. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 44(1), 1–19.Google Scholar
  35. Vähäsantanen, K. (2015). Professional agency in the steam of change: Understanding educational change and teachers’ professional identities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 47, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Vähäsantanen, K., Hökkä, P., Paloniemi, S., Herranen, S., & Eteläpelto, A. (2016). Professional learning and agency in an identity coaching programme. Professional Development in Education, 43(4), 514–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Vähäsantanen, K., Paloniemi, S., Hökkä, P., & Eteläpelto, A. (2017). Agentic perspective on fostering work-related learning. Studies in Continuing Education, 39(3), 251–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Weick, K., & Sutcliffe, M. (2007). Managing the unexpected. Resilient performance in an age of uncertainty. San Francisco: Sons. Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Päivi Hökkä
    • 1
    Email author
  • Matti Rautiainen
    • 1
  • Tiina Silander
    • 2
  • Anneli Eteläpelto
    • 1
  1. 1.University of JyväskyläJyväskyläFinland
  2. 2.Ministry of Education and CultureHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations