A Microfluidic Study of Immiscible Drainage Two-Phase Flow Regimes in Porous Media

  • Feng Guo
  • Saman A. AryanaEmail author
Part of the Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation book series (ASTI)


The motivation for this work is an improved characterization of flow regimes for two immiscible phases in porous media. A microfluidic device featuring a water-wet porous medium that is based on a two-dimensional representation of a Berea sandstone is coupled with a high-resolution camera that allows the visualization of the entire domain, while being able to resolve features as small as 10 μm. Drainage flow experiments are conducted across a range of capillary numbers of 1E−4 to 9E−8. The viscosity ratios, defined as the viscosity of the resident fluid to that of the invading fluid, range from 1E−4 to 13.6E3. The findings are mapped on a two-dimensional parameter space (viscosity ratio and capillary number), and stability diagrams proposed in the literature are superimposed for comparison. Results suggest that the transition regime may occupy a much larger region of the flow regime diagram than is suggested in recent literature.


Immiscible displacement Porous media Flow regime Viscosity ratio Capillary number 


  1. 1.
    Carroll, K.C., McDonald, K., Marble, J., Russo, A.E., Brusseau, M.L.: The impact of transitions between two-fluid and three-fluid phases on fluid configuration and fluid-fluid interfacial area in porous media. Water Resour. Res. 51(9), 7189–7201 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zhang, C., Oostrom, M., Wietsma, T.W., Grate, J.W., Warner, M.G.: Influence of viscous and capillary forces on immiscible fluid displacement: pore-scale experimental study in a water-wet micromodel demonstrating viscous and capillary fingering. Energy Fuels 25(8), 3493–3505 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Furtado, F., Pereira, F.: Crossover from nonlinearity controlled to heterogeneity controlled mixing in two-phase porous media flows. Comput. Geosci. 7(2), 115–135 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cottin, C., Bodiguel, H., Colin, A.: Drainage in two-dimensional porous media: from capillary fingering to viscous flow. Phys. Rev. E 82(4), 046315 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Løvoll, G., Jankov, M., Måløy, K.J., Toussaint, R., Schmittbuhl, J., Schäfer, G., Méheust, Y.: Influence of viscous fingering on dynamic saturation-pressure curves in porous media. Transp. Porous Media 86(1), 305–324 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lenormand, R.: Liquids in porous media. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2, 79–88 (1990)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Aryana, S.A., Kovscek, A.R.: Experiments and analysis of drainage displacement processes relevant to carbon dioxide injection. Phys. Rev. E 86(6), 066310 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Guo, F., He, J., Johnson, P.A., Aryana, S.A.: Stabilization of CO2 foam using by-product fly ash and recyclable iron oxide nanoparticles to improve carbon utilization in EOR processes. Sustain. Energy Fuels 1(4), 814–822 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Guo, F., Aryana, S.: An experimental investigation of nanoparticle-stabilized CO2 foam used in enhanced oil recovery. Fuel 186, 430–442 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Savani, I., Bedeaux, D., Kjelstrup, S., Vassvik, M., Sinha, S., Hansen, A.: Ensemble distribution for immiscible two-phase flow in porous media. Phys. Rev. E 023116 (2017)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fernández, J.F., Rangel, R., Rivero, J.: Crossover length from invasion percolation to diffusion-limited aggregation in porous media. Phys. Rev. Lett. 67(21), 2958 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lenormand, R., Touboul, E., Zarcone, C.: Numerical models and experiments on immiscible displacements in porous media. J. Fluid Mech. 189, 165–187 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of WyomingLaramieUSA

Personalised recommendations