Foam Flooding in a Heterogeneous Porous Medium

  • Feng Guo
  • Saman A. AryanaEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation book series (ASTI)


The impact of heterogeneity on the flow behavior of CO2 foam in the presence of crude oil is investigated in a complex, heterogeneous porous medium. A microfluidic device is fabricated featuring low and high permeability regions using a sequential photolithography technique. Two types of CO2 foams are used as the injectant: (i) foam stabilized with surfactants and (ii) foam stabilized with a blend of silica nanoparticles (Si NPs) and surfactants. High-resolution images of the medium during displacement experiments reveal a phase separation between the high versus low permeability regions; foam sweeps the high permeability regions, whereas the surfactant solution, along with few gas bubbles, appears to invade the low permeability region. The gains in recovery from the low-permeability region are attributed to the resistance to flow due to a relatively high apparent viscosity of foam in the high-permeability region and the resulting diversion of flow into the low-permeability region. The enhanced stability of foams stabilized with Si NPs appears to reduce the phase separation between the two regions, which contributes to an additional recovery gain from the low-permeability region.


Nanoparticles CO2 foam Heterogeneity Porous media Microfluidic device 


  1. 1.
    Aryana, S.A., Kovscek, A.R.: Experiments and analysis of drainage displacement processes relevant to carbon dioxide injection. Phys. Rev. E 86(6), 66–78 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Furtado, F., Pereira, F.: Crossover from nonlinearity controlled to heterogeneity controlled mixing in two-phase porous media flows. Comput. Geosci. 7(2), 115–135 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Guo, F., Aryana, S.: An experimental investigation of nanoparticle-stabilized CO2 foam used in enhanced oil recovery. Fuel 186, 430–442 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fernø, M.A., Gauteplass, J., Pancharoen, M., Haugen, Å., Graue, A., Kovscek, A.R.: Experimental study of foam generation, sweep efficiency, and flow in a fracture network. SPE J. 21(4), 1140–1150 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Xiao, S.Y., Zeng, Y.C., Vavra, D.E., He, P., Puerto, M., Hirasaki, J.G., Biswal, L.S.: Destabilization, propagation, and generation of surfactant-stabilized foam during crude oil displacement in heterogeneous model porous media. Langmuir 34(3), 739–749 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shi, S., Wang, Y., Li, Z., Ding, M., Chen, W.: Experimental study on stability and improving sweep efficiency with microfoam in heterogeneous porous media. J. Dispersion Sci. Technol. 37(8), 1152–1159 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Muggeridge, A., Cockin, A., Webb, K., Frampton, H., Collins, I., Moulds, T.: Recovery rates, enhanced oil recovery and technological limits. Philos. Trans. Ser. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 372(2006), 1–25 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Riche, C.T., Zhang, C., Gupta, M., Malmstadt, N.: Fluoropolymer surface coatings to control droplets in microfluidic devices. Lab Chip 14(11), 1834–1841 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mijatovic, D., Eijkel, J.C.T., van den Berg, A.: Technologies for nanofluidic systems: top-down vs. bottom-up-a review. Lab Chip 5(5), 492–500 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Guo, F., Aryana, S.A.: Improved sweep efficiency due to foam flooding in a heterogeneous microfluidic device. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 164, 155–163 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Guo, F., He, J., Johnson, P.A., Aryana, S.A.: Stabilization of CO2 foam using by-product fly ash and recyclable iron oxide nanoparticles to improve carbon utilization in EOR processes. Sustain. Energy Fuels 1(4), 814–822 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of WyomingLaramieUSA

Personalised recommendations