Advertisement

Caucasian-Arabian Syntaxis, The Alpine-Himalayan Continental Collisional Zone

  • Evgenii V. Sharkov
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation book series (ASTI)

Abstract

The Caucasian-Arabian segment of the huge Late Cenozoic Alpine-Himalayan orogenic belt marks a zone of the indentation of the Arabian plate into the Eurasian plate. The segment is formed by two tectonic domains: (1) the EW-striking Greater Caucasus (GC) at the north, which represents the southern margin of East European Craton, tectonically uplifted along the Main Caucasian Fault (MCF), and (2) Caucasian-Arabian Syntaxis (CAS) at the south; it includes arc-like tectonic domains of the Lesser Caucasus and Eastern Anatolia, vast thrust-folded belt between Eurasian and Arabian plates. A large NS-trending positive isostatic anomaly is characterized for CAS which suggests the presence of a mantle plume head beneath it. CAS is characterized by intense Neogene-Quaternary volcanism where two different types of magmatism occur: (1) extensive basaltic plateau with geochemical features of plume-related rocks, as well as (2) calc-alkaline volcanics, which are typical for supra subduction settings. However, according to seismic data, there is no subduction zone beneath the GC, but some north-directed seismic zones up to 50–70 km depth occurred beneath the CAS which, probably, can generate calc-alkaline magmas. So, we are suggesting that “mixed” magmatism in Caucasian-Arabian convergence considered here two independent magma sources: mantle plume and “embryonic” subduction zones.

Keywords

Greater caucasus Caucasian-Arabian syntaxis Continental collision Mantle plume Foreland’s tectonomagmatic processes “Mixed” magmatism 

References

  1. 1.
    Bazhenov, M.L., Burtman, V.S.: Structural Arcs of Alpine Belt (Carpatian, Caucasus, Pamir), p 167. Nauka Publ., Moscow (in Russian) (1990)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Camp, V.E., Roobol, M.J.: The Arabian continental alkali basalt province. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 101, 71–95 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chugaev, F.V., Chernyshev, I.V., Lebedev, V.A., Eremina, A.V.: Isotopic composition of plumbum and origin of Quaternaly lavas of Elbrus volcano (Greater Caucasus, Russia): data of high-precisions MC-ICP-MS method. Petrology 21, 16–27 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Eppelbaum, L.V., Katz, Y.: A new regard on the Tectonic Map of the Arabian-African region inferred from the satellite gravity analysis. Acta Geophys. 65, 607–626 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ernst, R.E.: Large Igneous Provinces. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Godoladze, T., Sandvol, E.A., Mackey, K.G., et al.: The caucasian seismic network (CNET): seismic structure of the Caucasus. Geophys. Res. Abstracts 20, EGU2018-19744 (2018) (EGU General Assembly 2018)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Khain, V.E.: Regional Geotectonics. Alpian-Mediterranean Belt, p 344. Moscow, Nedra (1984) (in Russian with English abstract)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kopp, M.L.: Late Alpine collisional structure of Caucasus region. In: Leonov, Y.G. (ed.) Alpine History of the Great Caucasus, pp. 285–316. GEOS, Moscow (2007) (in Russian)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lebedev, V.A., Chernyshev, I.V., Sharkov, E.V.: Geochronological scale and evolution of Late Cenozoic magmatism within Caucasian segment of the Alpine Belt. Dokl. Earth Sci. 441(2), 1656–1660 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lebedev, V.A., Sharkov, E.V., Unal, E., Keskin, M.: Late Pleistocene Tendurek Volcano (Eastern Anatolia, Turkey): II. Geochemistry and petrogenesis of the rocks. Petrology 24(3), 234–270 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Leonov, Y.G.: Cimmerian and late Alpine tectonics of the Greater Caucasus. In: Leonov, Y.G. (ed.) Alpine History of the Great Caucasus, pp. 317–340. GEOS, Moscow (2007) (in Russian)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lustrino, M., Sharkov, E.: Neogene volcanic activity of western Syria and its relationship with Arabian plate kinematics. J. Geodyn. 42, 115–139 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mosar, J., Mauvilly, J., Enna, N., et al.: The Greater Caucasus: a new tectonic map! Geophys. Res. Abstracts 20, EGU2018-7934 (2018) (EGU General Assembly 2018)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Oyan, V., Keskin, M., Lebedev, V.A., et al.: Petrology and geochemistry of the Quaternary Mafic Volcanism in the north-eastern branch of Lake Van, Eastern Anatolian Collision Zone. Turkey. J. Petrology 58(9), 1701–1728 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pearce, J.A., Bender, J.F., De Long, S.E., et al.: Genesis of collision volcanism in Eastern Anatoly. Turkey. J. Volcan. Geotherm. Res. 44, 189–229 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Reilinger, R., McClusky, S.: Nubia-Arabia-Eurasia plate motions and the dynamics of Mediterranean and Middle East tectonics. Geophys. J. Int. 186, 971–979 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rogozhin, E.A., Gorbatikov, A.V., Stepanova, Yu., M., et al.: Structure and modern geodynamics of the Greater Caucasus in the light of new data on its deep-seated structure. Geotectonics 2, 36–49 (2015)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Saintot, A., Brunet, M.-F., Yakovlev, F., et al.: The Mesozoic-Cenozoic tectonic evolution of the Great Caucasus. In: Gee, D.G., Stephenson, R.A. (eds.) European Lithosphere Dynamics. Geological Society of London Memoir, vol. 32, pp. 129–145 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sharkov, E., Lebedev, V., Chugaev, A., et al.: The Caucasian-Arabian segment of the Alpine-Himalayan collisional belt: geology, volcanism and neotectonics. Geosci. Front. 6, 513–522 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Shempelev, A.G., Prutsky, N.I., Kukhmazov, S.U.: Materials of geophysical investigation along Near-Elbrus profile (volcano Elbrus-Caucasian Mineral Waters). In: Tectonics of the Earth’s Crust and Mantle. Proceedings of XXXVIII Tectonic Meeting, pp. 361–365. GEOS, Moscow (2005) (in Russian)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Trifonov, V.G., Dodonov, A.E., Sharkov, E.V., et al.: New data on the Late Cenozoic basaltic volcanism in Syria, applied to its origin. J. Volcan. Geotherm. Res. 199, 177–192 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Trifonov, V.G., Sokolov, S.Y.: Sublithospheric flows in the mantle. Geotectonics 51(6), 535–548 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Geology of Ore Deposits, Petrography, Mineralogy and Geochemistry RASMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations