Identification of Saimaa Ringed Seal Individuals Using Transfer Learning

  • Ekaterina Nepovinnykh
  • Tuomas Eerola
  • Heikki Kälviäinen
  • Gleb Radchenko
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11182)


The conservation efforts of the endangered Saimaa ringed seal depend on the ability to reliably estimate the population size and to track individuals. Wildlife photo-identification has been successfully utilized in monitoring for various species. Traditionally, the collected images have been analyzed by biologists. However, due to the rapid increase in the amount of image data, there is a demand for automated methods. Ringed seals have pelage patterns that are unique to each seal enabling the individual identification. In this work, two methods of Saimaa ringed seal identification based on transfer learning are proposed. The first method involves retraining of an existing convolutional neural network (CNN). The second method uses the CNN trained for image classification to extract features which are then used to train a Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifier. Both approaches show over 90% identification accuracy on challenging image data, the SVM based method being slightly better.


Animal biometrics Saimaa ringed seals Convolutional neural networks Transfer learning Identification Image segmentation 



The authors would like to thank Meeri Koivuniemi, Miina Auttila, Riikka Levä-nen, Marja Niemi, and Mervi Kunnasranta from Department of Environmental and Biological Sciences at University of Eastern Finland for providing the database for the experiments and expert knowledge for identifying the individuals.


  1. 1.
    Albu, A.B., Wiebe, G., Govindarajulu, P., Engelstoft, C., Ovatska, K.: Towards automatic modelbased identification of individual sharp-tailed snakes from natural body markings. In: Proceedings of ICPR Workshop on Animal and Insect Behaviour, Tampa, FL, USA (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Allwein, E.L., Schapire, R.E., Singer, Y.: Reducing multiclass to binary: a unifying approach for margin classifiers. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 1(Dec), 113–141 (2000)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Anderson, C.: Individual identification of polar bears by whisker spot patterns. Ph.D. thesis, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Arbeláez, P., Pont-Tuset, J., Barron, J., Marques, F., Malik, J.: Multiscale combinatorial grouping. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 328–335 (2014)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Auttila, M., Niemi, M., Skrzypczak, T., Viljanen, M., Kunnasranta, M.: Estimating and mitigating perinatal mortality in the endangered Saimaa ringed seal (phoca hispida saimensis) in a changing climate. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 51(6), 526–534 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bendik, N.F., Morrison, T.A., Gluesenkamp, A.G., Sanders, M.S., O’Donnell, L.J.: Computer-assisted photo identification outperforms visible implant elastomers in an endangered salamander, Eurycea tonkawae. PLoS One 8(3), e59424 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chehrsimin, T., et al.: Automatic individual identification of saimaa ringed seals. IET Comput. Vis. 12(2), 146–152 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Crall, J., Stewart, C., Berger-Wolf, T., Rubenstein, D., Sundaresan, S.: Hotspotter - patterned species instance recognition. In: IEEE Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), pp. 230–237 (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Guschanski, K., Vigilant, L., McNeilage, A., Gray, M., Kagoda, E., Robbins, M.M.: Counting elusive animals: comparing field and genetic census of the entire mountain gorilla population of Bwindi Impenetrable National Park, Uganda. Biol. Conserv. 142(2), 290–300 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Halloran, K.M., Murdoch, J.D., Becker, M.S.: Applying computer-aided photo-identification to messy datasets: a case study of Thornicroft’s giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis thornicrofti). Afr. J. Ecol. 53(2), 147–155 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hoque, S., Azhar, M., Deravi, F.: Zoometrics-biometric identification of wildlife using natural body marks. Int. J. Bio-Sci. Bio-Technol. 3(3), 45–53 (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Koivuniemi, M., Auttila, M., Niemi, M., Levänen, R., Kunnasranta, M.: Photo-ID as a tool for studying and monitoring the endangered Saimaa ringed seal. Endanger. Species Res. 30, 29–36 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kovacs, K.M., et al.: Global threats to pinnipeds. Mar. Mammal Sci. 28(2), 414–436 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., Hinton, G.E.: Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In: Proceedings of Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), pp. 1097–1105 (2012)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kühl, H.S., Burghardt, T.: Animal biometrics: quantifying and detecting phenotypic appearance. Trends Ecol. Evol. 28(7), 432–441 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nepovinnykh, E.: Saimaa ringed seal fur pattern extraction for identification purposes. Master’s thesis, Lappeenranta University of Technology, Finland (2017)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ojansivu, V., Heikkilä, J.: Blur insensitive texture classification using local phase quantization. In: Elmoataz, A., Lezoray, O., Nouboud, F., Mammass, D. (eds.) ICISP 2008. LNCS, vol. 5099, pp. 236–243. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). Scholar
  18. 18.
    Phillips, P.J., Moon, H., Rizvi, S.A., Rauss, P.J.: The FERET evaluation methodology for face recognition algorithms. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 22(10), 1090–1104 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yu, X., Wang, J., Kays, R., Jansen, P., Wang, T., Huang, T.: Automated identification of animal species in camera trap images. EURASIP J. Image Video Process. 2013(1), 52 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhelezniakov, A., et al.: Segmentation of saimaa ringed seals for identification purposes. In: Bebis, G., et al. (eds.) ISVC 2015. LNCS, vol. 9475, pp. 227–236. Springer, Cham (2015). Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ekaterina Nepovinnykh
    • 1
    • 2
  • Tuomas Eerola
    • 1
  • Heikki Kälviäinen
    • 1
  • Gleb Radchenko
    • 2
  1. 1.Machine Vision and Pattern Recognition Laboratory, Department of Computational and Process Engineering, School of Engineering ScienceLappeenranta University of TechnologyLappeenrantaFinland
  2. 2.School of Electrical Engineering and Computer ScienceSouth Ural State UniversityChelyabinskRussian Federation

Personalised recommendations